본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성폭력법상 카메리등이용촬영죄에서의 구성요건 해석문제

The problem of interpretation in the crimes of illegal picture-taking by using camera

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Abstract

‘Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims thereof' has been punishing picture-taking by using camera or mechanical devices which induces sexual desires of others, or shame of those opened to shooting in order to block the phenomenon of fetishism. But it is difficult to find consistency in the application and interpretation of that law in a series of recent cases. It is because of the impossibility of victim identifying and distinguishing, the degree of open space and symbolism of body which influence on the sexual desire of others or physical or sexual shame. But the above factors are not proper elements to deny inducing sexual desire of others or sexual shame. The most basic element is the victim's intention. And it is natural that we can know the danger of routine judgement of sexual desire and sexual shame by going through a two-step judging process. In addition, the concept of sexual desire, or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is criminal sexual desires of himself or others or sexual shame beyond mere curiosity, or simple shame and disgust. When a normal average person feels a weak fundamental human shame against sexual morality in society as a personal existence, if it is not destroyed, the notion of sex exists for sound moral values is injuried, sexual desire or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is acknowledged. The concept of sexual desire or the shame in the crime of public indecency and obscene thing is to destroy humanity, human dignity or blatantly distort the representation of gender, people's dignity and value of sexual vice seriously. Those are only interested in sexual appeal, and reveal a naked act of normal sexual shame and hurt the good mind of public and the notion of sexual morality. In this sense, the concept of sexual desire or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is a broad sense of sexual desire or the shame unlike that of in the crime of public indecency and obscene thing. The current judging criteria which judge the cause of sexual desire or shame by the body parts is overly alienated with the goals of ‘Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims Thereof' and norms reality and the situation of our society. So the criteria has to be replaced as more comprehensive and precise scale which consider society's sexual morals notions, gender culture, the victim's intention, sex, age, relationship with criminals, filming the context of post-war conduct, both before and after shooting the victim's attitude, filmed parts of the body, kind of clothes and state of wearing.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김일수, "형법각론(제 7 판)" (2007), 박영사
  2. 박상기, "형법각론(제 6 판)" (2005), 박영사
  3. 배종대, "형법각론(제 6 판)" (2006), 홍문사
  4. 이재상, "형법각론(제 5 판 보정신판)" (2007), 박영사
  5. 정성근, "형법각론(제 3 판)" (2008), 삼지원
  6. 권창국, "淫亂物의 刑法的 規制에 관한 問題點의 檢討- 淫亂性 判斷基準 및 internet 등에 의한 淫亂情報流通을 중심으로 -", 형사정책연구, 13(1), pp.9~260 (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
  7. 박미숙, "형법상 음란물 규제와 그 헌법적 한계", 형사판례의 연구 Ⅰ : 이재상교수 화갑기념논문집 (2003)
  8. 이훈동, "한국의 성문화와 형사법", 외법논집, (25), pp.41~61 (2007), 법학연구소
  9. 임지봉, "出版物과 演劇․映畵․비디오물의 淫亂性判斷基準에 관한 硏究" (2000), 법조
  10. 조국, "공연음란죄의 내포와 외연", 형사판례연구, 10 (2002), 박영사
  11. J.S.Mill, "On Liberty and Utilitalianism" (1993), Bentham Books
  12. Wessels, "Strafrecht AT, 30 Aufl." (2000)
  13. 加藤久雄, "靑少年向け有害出版物にする法的規制の問題點(一)", 警察硏究, 62(11) (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)