본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

카메라등 이용촬영죄에서의 ‘성적 욕망 또는 수치심을 유발할 수 있는 타인의 신체성’ 판단에 대한 비판적 검토

Critical reconsideration of judgement of ‘other’s body which can cause shame or sexual desires’ in the crimes of illegal picture-taking by using camera

0

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

‘Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims thereof’ has been punishing picture-taking by using camera or mechanical devices which induces sexual desires of others, or shame of those opened to shooting in order to block the phenomenon of fetishism. But it is difficult to find consistency in the application and interpretation of that law in a series of recent cases. It is because of the impossibility of victim identifying and distinguishing, the degree of open space and symbolism of body which influence on the sexual desire of others or physical or sexual shame. But the above factors are not proper elements to deny inducing sexual desire of others or sexual shame. The most basic element is the victim’s intention. And it is natural that we can know the danger of routine judgement of sexual desire and sexual shame by going through a two-step judging process. In addition, the concept of sexual desire, or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is criminal sexual desires of himself or others or sexual shame beyond mere curiosity, or simple shame and disgust. When a normal average person feels a weak fundamental human shame against sexual morality in society as a personal existence, if it is not destroyed, the notion of sex exists for sound moral values is injuried, sexual desire or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is acknowledged. The concept of sexual desire or the shame in the crime of public indecency and obscene thing is to destroy humanity, human dignity or blatantly distort the representation of gender, people's dignity and value of sexual vice seriously. Those are only interested in sexual appeal, and reveal a naked act of normal sexual shame and hurt the good mind of public and the notion of sexual morality. In this sense, the concept of sexual desire or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is a broad sense of sexual desire or the shame unlike that of in the crime of public indecency and obscene thing. The current judging criteria which judge the cause of sexual desire or shame by the body parts is overly alienated with the goals of ‘Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims Thereof’ and norms reality and the situation of our society. So the criteria has to be replaced as more comprehensive and precise scale which consider society's sexual morals notions, gender culture, the victim's intention, sex, age, relationship with criminals, filming the context of post-war conduct, both before and after shooting the victim's attitude, filmed parts of the body, kind of clothes and state of wearing.

Abstract

‘Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims thereof’ has been punishing picture-taking by using camera or mechanical devices which induces sexual desires of others, or shame of those opened to shooting in order to block the phenomenon of fetishism. But it is difficult to find consistency in the application and interpretation of that law in a series of recent cases. It is because of the impossibility of victim identifying and distinguishing, the degree of open space and symbolism of body which influence on the sexual desire of others or physical or sexual shame. But the above factors are not proper elements to deny inducing sexual desire of others or sexual shame. The most basic element is the victim’s intention. And it is natural that we can know the danger of routine judgement of sexual desire and sexual shame by going through a two-step judging process. In addition, the concept of sexual desire, or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is criminal sexual desires of himself or others or sexual shame beyond mere curiosity, or simple shame and disgust. When a normal average person feels a weak fundamental human shame against sexual morality in society as a personal existence, if it is not destroyed, the notion of sex exists for sound moral values is injuried, sexual desire or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is acknowledged. The concept of sexual desire or the shame in the crime of public indecency and obscene thing is to destroy humanity, human dignity or blatantly distort the representation of gender, people's dignity and value of sexual vice seriously. Those are only interested in sexual appeal, and reveal a naked act of normal sexual shame and hurt the good mind of public and the notion of sexual morality. In this sense, the concept of sexual desire or the shame in the crime of illegal picture-taking is a broad sense of sexual desire or the shame unlike that of in the crime of public indecency and obscene thing. The current judging criteria which judge the cause of sexual desire or shame by the body parts is overly alienated with the goals of ‘Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims Thereof’ and norms reality and the situation of our society. So the criteria has to be replaced as more comprehensive and precise scale which consider society's sexual morals notions, gender culture, the victim's intention, sex, age, relationship with criminals, filming the context of post-war conduct, both before and after shooting the victim's attitude, filmed parts of the body, kind of clothes and state of wearing.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김일수, "형법각론(제7판)", pp.638~ (2007), 박영사
  2. 박상기, "형법각론(제6판)", pp.579~ (2005), 박영사
  3. 배종대, "형법각론(제6판)", pp.744~ (2006), 홍문사
  4. 이재상, "형법각론(제5판 보정신판)", pp.635~ (2007), 박영사
  5. 정성근, "형법각론(제3판)", pp.742~, 삼지원
  6. 권창국, "음란물의 형법적 규제에 관한 문제점의 검사", 한국공안행정학회보, (13), pp.1~28 (2002), 한국공안행정학회
  7. 박미숙, "형법상 음란물 규제와 그 헌법적 한계", 형사판례의 연구, pp.975~ (2003), 이재상교수 화갑기념논문집
  8. 조국, "공연음란죄의 내포와 외연", 형사판례연구, 10, pp.276~ (2002), 박영사
  9. 이훈동, "한국의 성문화와 형사법", 외법논집, 25, pp.2~
  10. 심희기, "문학작품의 음란성 판단기준", 고시연구, 97, pp.12~
  11. 진계호, "음란물죄에서의 음란성", 전남대 사회과학논총
  12. 임지봉, "出版物과 演劇‧映畵‧비디오물의 淫亂性 判斷基準에 관한 硏究", 법조, ~ (2000)
  13. J.S.Mill, "On Liberty and Utilitalianism", pp.12~ (1993), Bentham Books

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)