2021년도 형법판례 회고
The Reviews of the Criminal Law Cases of the Korean Supreme Court in 2021
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
I. Introduction In 2021, a total of 172 criminal cases were sentenced by the Korean Supreme Court. These cases refer to the data registered on the court website.1) Among them, 6 criminal cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel, were included. In this article, 4 cases by the Grand Panel and other several cases that is remanded after reversal are reviewed. The review of cases is as follows : 1. The Fact of Case, 2. The Reason for Judgment, 3. The Judgment Review. II. The Cases of the Grand Panel of the Korean Supreme Court In this chapter, 4 cases of the Grand Panel are reviewed. The subjects of the cases are ‘The voluntary disposition of real estate in a bilateral title trust and the crime of embezzlement’, ‘Whether the consent of the co-resident in the Intrusion upon Habitation’, ‘Judge's Sentencing Discretion in Arbitrary Reduction Cases’, ‘Whether the link act constitutes an aiding in the infringement of the public transmission right’. III. The Cases related to the General Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 4 cases art reviewed. The subject is related with ‘Article 16 of the Criminal Act, a justifiable reason for a mistake in the law’, ‘Justifiable reasons for violating of Matters to be observed’, ‘Alcohol blackout and passing out in Quasi-Indecent Act by Compulsion’, ‘Producing and possessing of child pornography’. IV. The Cases related to the Special Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 6 cases are reviewed. The subject is related with ‘whether or not the breach of trust is established in the error remittance of virtual currency’, ‘whether Alteration of Document is established in the act of erasing with correction tape’, ‘collateral and breach of trust’, ‘subject of the offense of intrusion upon habitation and rape’, ‘monetary debt and breach of trust’.
Abstract
I. Introduction In 2021, a total of 172 criminal cases were sentenced by the Korean Supreme Court. These cases refer to the data registered on the court website.1) Among them, 6 criminal cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel, were included. In this article, 4 cases by the Grand Panel and other several cases that is remanded after reversal are reviewed. The review of cases is as follows : 1. The Fact of Case, 2. The Reason for Judgment, 3. The Judgment Review. II. The Cases of the Grand Panel of the Korean Supreme Court In this chapter, 4 cases of the Grand Panel are reviewed. The subjects of the cases are ‘The voluntary disposition of real estate in a bilateral title trust and the crime of embezzlement’, ‘Whether the consent of the co-resident in the Intrusion upon Habitation’, ‘Judge's Sentencing Discretion in Arbitrary Reduction Cases’, ‘Whether the link act constitutes an aiding in the infringement of the public transmission right’. III. The Cases related to the General Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 4 cases art reviewed. The subject is related with ‘Article 16 of the Criminal Act, a justifiable reason for a mistake in the law’, ‘Justifiable reasons for violating of Matters to be observed’, ‘Alcohol blackout and passing out in Quasi-Indecent Act by Compulsion’, ‘Producing and possessing of child pornography’. IV. The Cases related to the Special Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 6 cases are reviewed. The subject is related with ‘whether or not the breach of trust is established in the error remittance of virtual currency’, ‘whether Alteration of Document is established in the act of erasing with correction tape’, ‘collateral and breach of trust’, ‘subject of the offense of intrusion upon habitation and rape’, ‘monetary debt and breach of trust’.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김대원, "방조범의 인과관계", 제345회 한국형사판례연구회 발표문 (2022)
- 김두상, "아동청소년이용음란물의 합리적 규제와 피해아동 보호에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 27(3), pp.23~44 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 김린, "화물자동차운수사업법상의 지입차주 보호방안에 대한 검토", 법학연구, 20(3), pp.255~285 (2017), 법학연구소
- 김성돈, "형법각론" (2016), SKKUP
- 김성돈, "알코올 블랙아웃과 ‘심신상실’", 형사판례연구, 29, pp.119~165 (2021), 한국형사판례연구회[DOI]
- 김성천, "금지착오 규정상의 ‘정당한 이유’에 대한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 10(1), pp.27~50 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
- 김슬기, "인터넷상 아동・청소년 이용 음란물 소지의 개념에 관한 검토 - 미국과의 비교를 중심으로 -", 과학기술법연구, 18(3), pp.301~328 (2012), 과학기술법연구원[DOI]
- 김혜정, "성폭력범죄에 있어서 ‘항거불능인 상태’의 의미", 형사판례연구, 14 (2006)
- 김혜정, "형법총론" (2020)
- 박상기, "형법강의" (2010), 법문사
- 박순배, "성폭력범죄의처벌및피해자보호등에관한법률 제8조 ‘정신상의 장애로 항거불능인 상태’의 의미", 우리형사판례연구회 발표문 (2005)
- 송문호, "아청법상 음란물소지죄의 제한적 적용가능성", 법학연구, 22(1), pp.337~353 (2014), 법학연구소
- 양창수, "부동산실명법 제4조에 의한 명의신탁의 효력 – 소위 등기명의신탁을 중심으로-", 법학, 38(1) (1997)
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2019), 박영사
- 이건호, "아동･청소년이용음란물의 범죄구성요건에 대한 검토", 형사정책연구, 26(1), pp.5~28 (2015), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 이수현, "법률의 착오에 있어 정당한 이유의 판단과정에 대한 대법원 태도의 비판", 법학논총, 19(2), pp.419~439 (2012), 법학연구원
- 이완형, "형의 임의적 감경에 관한 새로운 해석 – 대법원 2021. 1. 21. 선고 2018도5475 전원합의체 판결 -", 제340회 한국형사판례연구회 발표문 (2018)
- 이정원, "형법각론" (2019)
- (9) 형법 각칙, "법률신문", 2022
- 이창섭, "부동산 명의수탁자의 횡령죄 주체성", 형사판례연구, 19, pp.236~265 (2011), 한국형사판례연구회[DOI]
- 이창섭, "악의의 계약명의신탁과 명의수탁자의 형사책임", 법학연구, 54(4), pp.53~79 (2013), 법학연구소
- 이창온, "주거침입의 보호법익과 행위태양 –대법원 2021. 9. 9. 선고 2020도12630전원합의체 판결 -", 제344회 한국형사판례연구회 발표문 (2020)
- 이형국, "형법각론" (2019), 법문사
- 장성원, "가상자산의 착오이체와 배임죄", 제345회 한국형사판례연구회 발표문 (2022)
- 정승환, "2021년 형법 중요판례평석 - 대법원 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, (504), pp.6~28 (2022), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 조현욱, "양자 간 명의신탁과 횡령죄", 비교형사법연구, 20(3), pp.111~132 (2018), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
- 천진호, "명의신탁부동산 처분행위의 형사책임", 비교형사법연구, 4(1) (2002)
- 황태윤, "형법의 소유 개념으로서 “재물의 사실상 또는 법률상 지배력 있는 상태” - 대법원 2015. 6. 25. 선고 2015도1944 전원합의체 판결 -", 동북아법연구, 10(3), pp.921~946 (2017), 동북아법연구소[DOI]
- 황태윤, "양자간 부동산명의신탁에서 명의신탁자에 대한 형법상 보호 - 대법원 2021. 2. 18. 선고 2016도18761 전원합의체 판결 -", 법학연구, 62(2), pp.29~51 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]