2018년도 형법판례 회고
The Reviews of the Criminal Cases of the Korean Supreme Court in 2018
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the year of 2018, 150 criminal cases by the Korean Supreme Court(KSC) are registered on the internet homepage of the Court (https://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/intesrch/sjo022.do#//). 4 criminal law cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel. In this paper, above 4 cases and other several cases are reviewed which seem to be comparatively important to the author. Most of the reviews are constituted as follows: 1. The Fact of the Case, 2. The Summary of Decision and 3. The Note. But in some reviews the fact of the case are omitted. The contents of this paper is as follows; Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. The Cases of the Grand Panel of the Korean Supreme Court In this chapter, 4 cases of the Grand Panel are reviewed. The subjects of the cases are ‘the double selling of the real estate and the breach of trust’, ‘the embezzlement in the voice phishing crime’, ‘the reasonable interpretation of the concept of internet site system’, ‘the criminal liability of the conscientious objector’. Ⅲ. The Cases relating to General Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 4 cases are reviewed. The subjects of all cases are related to how to interpret the criminal provisions reasonably observing the strict interpretation principle of the criminal law. Ⅳ. The Cases relating to Special Part of Criminal Law 7 Cases are reviewed in this Chapter. The crimes which are the subjects of the reviews are the abandonment, the indecent assault, the libel and slander, the fraud, the breach of trust and etc.
Abstract
In the year of 2018, 150 criminal cases by the Korean Supreme Court(KSC) are registered on the internet homepage of the Court (https://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/intesrch/sjo022.do#//). 4 criminal law cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel. In this paper, above 4 cases and other several cases are reviewed which seem to be comparatively important to the author. Most of the reviews are constituted as follows: 1. The Fact of the Case, 2. The Summary of Decision and 3. The Note. But in some reviews the fact of the case are omitted. The contents of this paper is as follows; Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. The Cases of the Grand Panel of the Korean Supreme Court In this chapter, 4 cases of the Grand Panel are reviewed. The subjects of the cases are ‘the double selling of the real estate and the breach of trust’, ‘the embezzlement in the voice phishing crime’, ‘the reasonable interpretation of the concept of internet site system’, ‘the criminal liability of the conscientious objector’. Ⅲ. The Cases relating to General Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 4 cases are reviewed. The subjects of all cases are related to how to interpret the criminal provisions reasonably observing the strict interpretation principle of the criminal law. Ⅳ. The Cases relating to Special Part of Criminal Law 7 Cases are reviewed in this Chapter. The crimes which are the subjects of the reviews are the abandonment, the indecent assault, the libel and slander, the fraud, the breach of trust and etc.
참고문헌 (15)
- "로앤비 천자평석"[URL]
- 전윤경, "일명 ‘보이스피싱’ 범죄에 가담한 대포통장 양도인의 방조범의 인정여부 - 대법원 2008. 6. 26. 선고 2008도1239 판결 -", 형사법의 신동향, (52), pp.80~116 (2016), 대검찰청[DOI]
- 문영식, "사기이용계좌(대포통장)의 명의인이 전기통신금융사기(보이스피싱) 피해금을임의로 인출한 경우 횡령죄의 성부", 형사법의 신동향, (62), pp.198~236 (2019), 대검찰청[DOI]
- "대법원 2017. 11. 14. 선고 2017도13140 판결", ~ (2017)
- 심영주, "양심적 병역거부 ― 대법원 2018.11. 1. 선고 2016도10912 전원합의체 판결 ―", 한국형사판례연구회 2019년 3월 발표회 발표논문 (2018)
- 손동권, "형법상 양심범처벌(良心犯處罰)의 문제점 ― 독일의 이론 및 판례(判例)를 중심으로 ―", 안암법학, 2, pp.309~345 (1994)
- 박중규, "양심범, 확신범 그리고 격정범에 대한 책임해석론의 내용 ― 독일의 해석론을 논의 대상으로 ―", 비교형사법연구, 2, pp.27~41 (2000)
- "대법원 2014. 1. 29. 선고 2013도13937 판결 외 다수판결", ~ (2014)
- "대법원 2011. 11. 24. 선고 2011도12302 판결", ~ (2011)
- 서효원, "유기죄의 주체인 법률상, 계약상 보호의무 있는 자의 범위", 법조, 66(1), pp.351~395 (2017), 법조협회[DOI]
- 류전철, "유기죄 해석론의 비판적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 6(2-1), pp.59~82 (2004), 한국비교형사법학회
- "대법원 2008. 6. 19. 선고 2006도4876 전원합의체 판결", ~ (2008)
- 조현욱, "차량교통이 통제된 도로에서 진행된 집회․시위에 참가한 사람에 대한 일반교통방해죄 성립 여부-대법원 2018. 1. 24. 선고 2017도11408 판결-", 저스티스, 168, pp.331~356 (2018), 한국법학원[DOI]
