2022년도 형법판례 회고
The Reviews of the Criminal Law Cases of the Korean Supreme Court in 2022
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ⅰ. Introduction In 2022, a total of 226 criminal cases were sentenced by the Korean Supreme Court. These cases refer to the data registered on the court website.1) Among them, 7 criminal cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel, were included. In this article, 6 cases by the Grand Panel and other several cases that is remanded after reversal are reviewed. The review of cases is as follows: 1. The Fact of Case, 2. The Reason for Judgment, 3. The Review. Ⅱ. The Cases of the Grand Panel of the Korean Supreme Court In this chapter, 6 cases of the Grand Panel are reviewed. The subjects of the cases are ‘whether the transferor of the creditor is subject to the crime of embezzlement’, ‘the concept of indecent act and the scope of component analysis’, ‘entry into public places and the purpose of the crime’, ‘Article 1, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Act and the motive theory’, ‘oriental medicine doctor’ Use of ultrasonic diagnostic equipment and licensed medical practice’ and ‘whether the debtor under the transfer security contract is the subject of the breach of trust’. Ⅲ. The Cases related to the General Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 3 cases are reviewed. The subject is related with ‘Timing of Execution in House Trespassing’, ‘Criminal legalism and legal interpretation,’ and ‘accomplices without principal offenders and identity offender’. Ⅳ. The Cases related to the Special Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 6 cases are reviewed. The subject is related with ‘Scope of office authority and meaning of abuse’, ‘Collection of data through crawling and violation of information and communication networks’, ‘The meaning of storage in the embezzlement’, ‘Forced indecent assault after breaking into a house and responsibility’, ‘The Concept of Leakage and Whistleblowing’, ect.
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction In 2022, a total of 226 criminal cases were sentenced by the Korean Supreme Court. These cases refer to the data registered on the court website.1) Among them, 7 criminal cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel, were included. In this article, 6 cases by the Grand Panel and other several cases that is remanded after reversal are reviewed. The review of cases is as follows: 1. The Fact of Case, 2. The Reason for Judgment, 3. The Review. Ⅱ. The Cases of the Grand Panel of the Korean Supreme Court In this chapter, 6 cases of the Grand Panel are reviewed. The subjects of the cases are ‘whether the transferor of the creditor is subject to the crime of embezzlement’, ‘the concept of indecent act and the scope of component analysis’, ‘entry into public places and the purpose of the crime’, ‘Article 1, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Act and the motive theory’, ‘oriental medicine doctor’ Use of ultrasonic diagnostic equipment and licensed medical practice’ and ‘whether the debtor under the transfer security contract is the subject of the breach of trust’. Ⅲ. The Cases related to the General Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 3 cases are reviewed. The subject is related with ‘Timing of Execution in House Trespassing’, ‘Criminal legalism and legal interpretation,’ and ‘accomplices without principal offenders and identity offender’. Ⅳ. The Cases related to the Special Part of Criminal Law In this chapter, 6 cases are reviewed. The subject is related with ‘Scope of office authority and meaning of abuse’, ‘Collection of data through crawling and violation of information and communication networks’, ‘The meaning of storage in the embezzlement’, ‘Forced indecent assault after breaking into a house and responsibility’, ‘The Concept of Leakage and Whistleblowing’, ect.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김경석, "내부고발자 보호를 위한 제도개선에 관한 소고 ― 기업의 내부고발자 보호를 중심으로 ―", 서울법학, 26(3), pp.455~484 (2018), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
- 김병수, "주거침입죄와 사회적 다양성 ― 대법원 2022. 3. 24. 선고 2017도18272 전원합의체 판결 ―", 제249회 영남형사판례연구회 발표자료 (2023)
- 김성룡, "정범없는 공범과 규범적 ․ 사회적 의사지배", 제355회 형사판례연구회 발표문 (2022)
- 김일수, "새로쓴 형법각론" (2018), 박영사
- 김태균, "크롤링을 통한 데이터 수집의 형사책임 ― 대법원 2022. 5. 12. 선고2021도1533 판결을 중심으로 ―", 한국형사판례연구회 ․ 대법원 형사법연구회 공동학술대회 발표문 (2022)
- 김태명, "정당한 이유없이 출입을 금지당한 공동거주자가 공동생활의 장소에 들어간 경우 주거침입죄의 성립여부", 형사판례연구, 30, pp.381~421 (2022), 한국형사판례연구회
- 김혜정, "2020년도 형법판례 회고", 형사판례연구, 29, pp.495~538 (2021), 한국형사판례연구회[DOI]
- 김혜정, "형법각론" (2021), 정독
- 김혜정, "형법총론" (2022), 정독
- 김성돈, "직권남용죄, 남용의 의미와 범위", 법조, 68(3), pp.205~232 (2019), 법조협회[DOI]
- 김성돈, "형법각론" (2022), SKKUP
- 오병두, "직권남용권리행사방해죄와 직권 그리고 남용의 결과", 한국형사판례연구회 ․ 대법원 형사법연구회 공동학술대회 발표문 (2022)
- 오영근, "형법총론" (2019), 박영사
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2021), 박영사
- 오영근, "부정한 목적의 음식점 출입과 주거침입죄의 성립여부" (2022), 로앤비 천자평석
- 오영근, "주거침입죄에서 ‘침입’의 판단방법" (2022), 로앤비 천자평석
- 이경민, "‘면허된 것 이외의 의료행위’ 해당 여부에 관한 판단 기준의 정립 방향 -한의사의 의료기기 등 사용을 중심으로", 사법, 1(57), pp.447~486 (2021), 사법발전재단[DOI]
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2021), 박영사
- 이창온, "주거침입의 보호법익과 침입의 태양 ―대법원 2021. 9. 9. 선고 2020도12630 전원합의체 판결―", 형사판례연구, 30, pp.335~379 (2022), 한국형사판례연구회
- 임석순, "군형법상 추행죄에 대한 비판적 고찰", 홍익법학, 20(3), pp.239~264 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 전병주, "한의사의 초음파 진단기기 사용과 의료법 위반에 관한 판례 고찰", 인문사회과학연구, 31(1), pp.386~405 (2023), 인문사회과학연구소
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2019), SKKUP
- 정현순, "저작권법상 데이터베이스제작자 권리 침해에 관한 연구 – 대법원 2022. 5. 12. 선고 2021도1533 판결을 중심으로 -", 계간 저작권, 35(3), pp.157~196 (2022), 한국저작권위원회[DOI]
- 지은석, "권리행사방해죄의 공모공동정범 - 대법원 2022. 9. 15. 선고 2022도5827 판결 -", 형사법의 신동향, (77), pp.227~258 (2022), 대검찰청
- 지은석, "형법 제1조 제2항에서 ‘법률의 변경’의 해석 - 대법원 2022. 12. 22. 선고 2020도16420 전원합의체 판결 -", 홍익법학, 24(1), pp.211~233 (2023), 법학연구소[DOI]
