Child Negation in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean children are known to optionally misplace the negative morpheme an when they form negative sentences. Instead of placing it immediately before a predicate, they sometimes put it in a position removed from the predicate. Hagstrom (2002) proposes that Korean children’s errors are not something new but just language-specific instantiations of the errors commonly made by child speakers of all languages in the Optional Infinitives (OI) stage. Following Wexler (1998), he argues that Korean child negation errors result from the conflict between three constraints—the Unique Checking Constraint, Realize Tense, and Realize Agreement. An important prediction that follows from his theory is that a Korean child has a 33.3 percent chance of making an error whenever (s)he utters a negative sentence. In this article, I aim to test Hagstrom’s theory and prediction. To this aim, negative sentences have been elicited from three children and analyzed. The result is that while children make optional errors in certain types of sentences, they make consistent or no errors in other types of sentences. This suggests that Korean child negation errors are controlled by sentence types rather than probability as Hagstrom claims.
Abstract
Korean children are known to optionally misplace the negative morpheme an when they form negative sentences. Instead of placing it immediately before a predicate, they sometimes put it in a position removed from the predicate. Hagstrom (2002) proposes that Korean children’s errors are not something new but just language-specific instantiations of the errors commonly made by child speakers of all languages in the Optional Infinitives (OI) stage. Following Wexler (1998), he argues that Korean child negation errors result from the conflict between three constraints—the Unique Checking Constraint, Realize Tense, and Realize Agreement. An important prediction that follows from his theory is that a Korean child has a 33.3 percent chance of making an error whenever (s)he utters a negative sentence. In this article, I aim to test Hagstrom’s theory and prediction. To this aim, negative sentences have been elicited from three children and analyzed. The result is that while children make optional errors in certain types of sentences, they make consistent or no errors in other types of sentences. This suggests that Korean child negation errors are controlled by sentence types rather than probability as Hagstrom claims.
참고문헌 (12)
- Bak, J., "The light verb construction in Korean", doctoral, pp.2011
- Boser, K., "The syntax of CP and V2 in early child German (ECG): The strong continuity hypothesis", NELS, 22, pp.51~65 (1992)
- Cho, Y. -M., "Evidence for the VP constituent from child Korean", Papers and Reports in Child Language Development, 27, pp.31~38 (1988)
- Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Crain, S., "Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics" (1998), MIT Press
- Freudenthal, D., "Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of optional infinitive errors across languages: A comparison of MOSAIC and the variational learning model", Journal of Child Language, 37(3), pp.643~669 (2010)
- Hagstrom, P., "Implications of child errors for the syntax of negation in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, pp.211~242 (2002)
- Kim, Y. -J., "The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition", pp.335~443 (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Phillips, C., "Syntax at age two", Papers on language processing and acquisition (MITWPL 26), pp.37~93 (1995)
- Pierce, A., "On the emergence of syntax: A crosslinguistic study", doctoral, pp.1989
- Wexler, K., "Verb movement", pp.305~350 (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Wexler, K., "Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage", Lingua, 106, pp.23~79 (1998)