Extended Use of Korean Negation Marker Ani in Early L1 Korean Development: A Case Study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper reports on a young Korean boy’s target-like and non-target-like uses of the Korean negation marker ani to express various types of negation in Korean, observed approximately between the ages of 2;2 and 2;5. Besides the target-like usage of ani as a sentential adverb for a ‘no’ response, he used ani in place of Korean short-form negation markers an and mos, non-existential predicate epsta, and prohibitive predicate malta. Discussions regarding why the duration of his extended use of ani differed between the non-target-like uses and his placement of the negation marker are provided. Overall, such extended use of ani may have been a deliberate and practical strategy for him to express various types of negation in Korean when he did not yet acquire or was not able to readily retrieve the appropriate negation markers.
Abstract
This paper reports on a young Korean boy’s target-like and non-target-like uses of the Korean negation marker ani to express various types of negation in Korean, observed approximately between the ages of 2;2 and 2;5. Besides the target-like usage of ani as a sentential adverb for a ‘no’ response, he used ani in place of Korean short-form negation markers an and mos, non-existential predicate epsta, and prohibitive predicate malta. Discussions regarding why the duration of his extended use of ani differed between the non-target-like uses and his placement of the negation marker are provided. Overall, such extended use of ani may have been a deliberate and practical strategy for him to express various types of negation in Korean when he did not yet acquire or was not able to readily retrieve the appropriate negation markers.
참고문헌 (19)
- Allendorff, S., "Some overgeneralizations in the L1acquisition of interrogative pronouns", IRAL : International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 19(1), pp.31~44 (1981)
- Bloom, L., "Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars" (1970), MIT Press
- Choi, S., "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics I", pp.135~144 (1985), Harvard University Department of Linguistics
- Déprez, V., "Negation and functional projections in early grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 24(1), pp.25~67 (1993)
- Hagstrom, P., "Implications of child errors for the syntax of negation in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11(3), pp.211~242 (2002)
- Kavak, V., "The acquisition and use of negation in the early child language", Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(2), pp.587~604 (2019)
- Kim, C., "Child negation in Korean", The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(2), pp.39~60 (2018)
- Kim, Y.-J, "The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 4)", pp.335~443 (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Klima, E., "Psycholinguistics papers", pp.183~208 (1966), Edinburgh University Press
- O’Grady, W., "Syntactic development" (1997), The University of Chicago Press
- O’Grady, W, "How children learn language" (2005), Cambridge
- O’Grady, W., "Contemporary linguistics: An introduction", pp.2001, Bedford
- Peccei, J. S., "Child language: A resource book for students" (2006), Psychology Press
- Pinto, R. F. Jr., "A computational theory of child overextension", Cognition, 206, pp.104472~ (2021)
- Rescorla, L., "Overextension in early language development", Journal of Child Language, 7(2), pp.321~335 (1980)
- Rispoli, M., "Pronoun case overextensions and paradigm building", Journal of Child Language, 21(1), pp.157~172 (1994)
- Sohn, H.-M., "The Korean language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Thomson, J. R., "Who is ‘Daddy’ revisited : The status of two-year-olds’ over-extended words in use and comprehension", Journal of Child Language, 4, pp.359~375 (1976)
- Tomasello, M., "First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition", Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1-2), pp.61~82 (2000)