崇德年間 淸朝의 朝鮮 王室 冊封과 冊封文書
A Study on the Qing Investiture Documents for Chosŏn prior to 1644 — Types, Languages, and Other Issues —
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Having succeeded in his personal expedition against Chosŏn Korea in 1637, Hong Taiji, the founder and first emperor of the Qing empire, had the right to formally appoint Chosŏn’s king, his consort, and heir apparent. While it is well known that Hong Taiji issued the investiture documents for Chosŏn’s king in late 1637 and those for Chosŏn’s consort and heir apparent in 1639, there is no consensus on details like the type of imperial documents and languages used in these documents. Through close analysis of the contemporary accounts of the original imperial documents, which are not extant today, this paper explores these questions and sheds light on the major characteristics of the Qing investiture documents of pre-1644 era, which are distinctive from the Ming imperial convention before 1637. Qing investiture documents had the following characteristics. First, whereas the conventional set of investiture documents for Chosŏn’s king were constituted by a proclamation document, a notification letter, and a certificate document, in 1637 Hong Taiji only issued the notification and certificate, omitting the proclamation document. Second, while the Ming emperors had never issued certificate documents for Chosŏn’s heirs apparent, when the Qing court held the 1639 investiture ritual for Crown Prince Sohyŏn at Mukden, it instituted a new convention. From then on, a certificate document should be included among the investiture documents for the successor to the kingship of Chosŏn. Third, the Qing imperial investiture documents for Chosŏn were written in both Manchu and Han Chinese, such bilingualism in documents continued into the post-1644 investitures.
Abstract
Having succeeded in his personal expedition against Chosŏn Korea in 1637, Hong Taiji, the founder and first emperor of the Qing empire, had the right to formally appoint Chosŏn’s king, his consort, and heir apparent. While it is well known that Hong Taiji issued the investiture documents for Chosŏn’s king in late 1637 and those for Chosŏn’s consort and heir apparent in 1639, there is no consensus on details like the type of imperial documents and languages used in these documents. Through close analysis of the contemporary accounts of the original imperial documents, which are not extant today, this paper explores these questions and sheds light on the major characteristics of the Qing investiture documents of pre-1644 era, which are distinctive from the Ming imperial convention before 1637. Qing investiture documents had the following characteristics. First, whereas the conventional set of investiture documents for Chosŏn’s king were constituted by a proclamation document, a notification letter, and a certificate document, in 1637 Hong Taiji only issued the notification and certificate, omitting the proclamation document. Second, while the Ming emperors had never issued certificate documents for Chosŏn’s heirs apparent, when the Qing court held the 1639 investiture ritual for Crown Prince Sohyŏn at Mukden, it instituted a new convention. From then on, a certificate document should be included among the investiture documents for the successor to the kingship of Chosŏn. Third, the Qing imperial investiture documents for Chosŏn were written in both Manchu and Han Chinese, such bilingualism in documents continued into the post-1644 investitures.
참고문헌 (24)
- "同文彙考", 국사편찬위원회, ~ (1978)
- "滿文老檔 Ⅵ" (1962), 東洋文庫
- "明太宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회DB, ~
- "明熹宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회DB, ~
- "承政院日記", 국사편찬위원회DB, ~
- "역주 소현심양일기 1" (2008), 민속원
- "仁祖實錄", 국사편찬위원회DB, ~
- "詔勅謄錄", 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원 소장, 奎12904의2, ~
- "中宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회DB, ~
- "淸世祖實錄", 국사편찬위원회DB, ~
- "淸太宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회DB, ~
- "太宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회DB, ~
- 국립중앙도서관, "고문서해제 10", ~ (1972)
- 소현세자 시강원, "심양장계 : 심양에서 온 편지" (2008), 창비
- 張存武, "淸入關前與朝鮮往來國書彙編, 1619-1643" (2000), 國史館
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸代文書檔案圖鑒" (2004), 岳麓書社
- 구범진, "병자호란, 홍타이지의 전쟁" (2019), 까치글방
- 김성수, "五世 달라이라마 北京行의 배경과 17세기 내륙아시아 네트워크", 명청사연구, (29), pp.115~158 (2008), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 장을연, "淸代 조선왕실 冊封誥命과 조선 敎命의 형태 비교연구", 藏書閣, (24), pp.135~168 (2010), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- 정동훈, "冊과 誥命 - 고려시대 국왕 책봉문서", 사학연구, (126), pp.149~202 (2017), 한국사학회
- 홍성구, "국립중앙도서관 소장 「淸太宗詔諭」에 대하여", 대구사학, 123, pp.245~273 (2016), 대구사학회
- 홍성구, "국내 소장 滿文 文書 소개", 古文書硏究, 47, pp.213~233 (2015), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
- 片岡一忠, "中國官印制度硏究" (2008), 東方書店
- 黄锡惠, "满文篆字创制时间及分期研究", 알타이학보, (26), pp.63~84 (2016), 한국알타이학회[DOI]
