淸代 錦屛縣 加池寨의 經濟的 有力層과 少數民族 社會 ― 『淸水江文書』의 加池寨 斷賣 文書를 중심으로 ―(2)
Economic Leading People of Jiachi village(加池寨) and Minority Society of the Qing Period — Focusing on the sale documents of Jiachi Village from Documents of Qingshui River(2) —
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The existence of the Documents of the Qingshui River must have brought new attention to the minority community in the province. The study is aimed at examining the behavior of influential people following the first paper that unearthed influential people based on Jiachi village single-sale documents in the Documents of the Qingshui River. Thus, unlike the first paper, which intensively analyzed single-sale documents among the documents related to Jiachi village, the 1-2-5 series documents, which record only the contents of conflicts, lawsuits and crimes between individuals, was used as the main materials here. The social aspect of Jinping district, which appears in 1-2-5 series documents, was clearly a society where extreme conflict and competition existed, and it was clear that influential people were engaged in mudslinging for their own interests, and the main contents of this paper were as follows. First, we can first confirm that there were serious social crimes, such as murder and rape, as well as crimes such as theft and default on repayment of debts, which were no different from any other Han Chinese society. However, due to the nature of the Jiachi village society, which focuses on forestry, among these various crimes, the most notable were the so-called ‘yuejieqiangkan(越界强砍, cut down a tree by invading the border)’ acts, and most of the lawsuits between individuals, which account for about 80 percent of 132 documents affiliated with 1-2-5, were due to the acts mentioned just above. Second, this illegal lumber barber was more than just an antagonism between individuals, and lawsuits and conflicts developed among the villages. However, it is noteworthy that the main driver of the illegal logging was the gentlemen of Jiachi village, and the participants were the influential figures who had fallen economically in the Jiachi village. For example, documents from 1-2-5 affiliates show that Wang Zhihao(王治浩), originally belonged to a poor class but had been at odds with Jiang Zuoxing(姜佐興) since joining the ranks of the gentlemen, and that once rich Jiang Chaoying(姜朝英) and Jiang Chaobi(姜朝弼) sold almost all of their assets to Jiang Zuoxing. The stories of these characters provide important clues that society has undergone many changes between Daoguang and Xianfeng periods, while social mobility has been quite frequent. Third, illegal practices involving various crimes and timber have been frequent, but on the other hand, it is also confirmed that the powerful have devoted themselves to protecting their forestry, which is the basis of their economic activities. The specific aspects are well illustrated in the measures to prevent the bandits, which have occurred frequently since the Daoguang period. It is the fact that in the joint efforts of the influential people to prevent bandits, forestry must be protected uniformly in addition to routine measures such as cooperation for blocking bandits and blocking entry of suspicious individuals. This clearly means that the most basic purpose of defending against outside invasive forces, such as bandits, was to protect forestry, which is the basis of society, beyond simply maintaining local security. In this regard, it is also very significant that not only fines were imposed on those who violate forestry protection, but also that the fact of the crime was widely publicized to the community. Finally, most of the characters in the 1-2-5 series are obviously members of the Jiang clan, but it is also meaningful to note that they are descendants of Jiang Fuchen(姜輔臣), who are different from the Jiang clan of the Siheyuan(四合院), which was mentioned in the previous article. The reason for this is that the documents are tracking individual figures appearing in Documents of the Qingshui River, breaking away from case-by-case studies such as sale of the forestry fields, the peculiar customs of minority society, occurrence and settlement of disputes between indviduals, inheritance, and women's status. Given the fact that the Jiang clan of Jiachi village still has documents to buy the forestry fields so far, access to such individual figures is a good example to prove the long-term continuation of minority society, which naturally requires more diverse research on this issue.
Abstract
The existence of the Documents of the Qingshui River must have brought new attention to the minority community in the province. The study is aimed at examining the behavior of influential people following the first paper that unearthed influential people based on Jiachi village single-sale documents in the Documents of the Qingshui River. Thus, unlike the first paper, which intensively analyzed single-sale documents among the documents related to Jiachi village, the 1-2-5 series documents, which record only the contents of conflicts, lawsuits and crimes between individuals, was used as the main materials here. The social aspect of Jinping district, which appears in 1-2-5 series documents, was clearly a society where extreme conflict and competition existed, and it was clear that influential people were engaged in mudslinging for their own interests, and the main contents of this paper were as follows. First, we can first confirm that there were serious social crimes, such as murder and rape, as well as crimes such as theft and default on repayment of debts, which were no different from any other Han Chinese society. However, due to the nature of the Jiachi village society, which focuses on forestry, among these various crimes, the most notable were the so-called ‘yuejieqiangkan(越界强砍, cut down a tree by invading the border)’ acts, and most of the lawsuits between individuals, which account for about 80 percent of 132 documents affiliated with 1-2-5, were due to the acts mentioned just above. Second, this illegal lumber barber was more than just an antagonism between individuals, and lawsuits and conflicts developed among the villages. However, it is noteworthy that the main driver of the illegal logging was the gentlemen of Jiachi village, and the participants were the influential figures who had fallen economically in the Jiachi village. For example, documents from 1-2-5 affiliates show that Wang Zhihao(王治浩), originally belonged to a poor class but had been at odds with Jiang Zuoxing(姜佐興) since joining the ranks of the gentlemen, and that once rich Jiang Chaoying(姜朝英) and Jiang Chaobi(姜朝弼) sold almost all of their assets to Jiang Zuoxing. The stories of these characters provide important clues that society has undergone many changes between Daoguang and Xianfeng periods, while social mobility has been quite frequent. Third, illegal practices involving various crimes and timber have been frequent, but on the other hand, it is also confirmed that the powerful have devoted themselves to protecting their forestry, which is the basis of their economic activities. The specific aspects are well illustrated in the measures to prevent the bandits, which have occurred frequently since the Daoguang period. It is the fact that in the joint efforts of the influential people to prevent bandits, forestry must be protected uniformly in addition to routine measures such as cooperation for blocking bandits and blocking entry of suspicious individuals. This clearly means that the most basic purpose of defending against outside invasive forces, such as bandits, was to protect forestry, which is the basis of society, beyond simply maintaining local security. In this regard, it is also very significant that not only fines were imposed on those who violate forestry protection, but also that the fact of the crime was widely publicized to the community. Finally, most of the characters in the 1-2-5 series are obviously members of the Jiang clan, but it is also meaningful to note that they are descendants of Jiang Fuchen(姜輔臣), who are different from the Jiang clan of the Siheyuan(四合院), which was mentioned in the previous article. The reason for this is that the documents are tracking individual figures appearing in Documents of the Qingshui River, breaking away from case-by-case studies such as sale of the forestry fields, the peculiar customs of minority society, occurrence and settlement of disputes between indviduals, inheritance, and women's status. Given the fact that the Jiang clan of Jiachi village still has documents to buy the forestry fields so far, access to such individual figures is a good example to prove the long-term continuation of minority society, which naturally requires more diverse research on this issue.
참고문헌 (41)
- 高聰, "貴州淸水江流域明淸土司契約文書 – 九南篇" (2013), 民族出版社
- 貴州省錦屛縣志編纂委員會, "錦屛縣志" (1995), 貴州人民出版社
- 貴州省文史硏究館, "民國貴州文獻大系 3輯(下冊)" (2015), 貴州人民出版社
- 唐立, "貴州苗族林業契約文書匯編(1763~1950)" (2001), 東京外國語大學國立亞非語言文化硏究所
- 黎平縣縣志編纂委員會辦公室, "黎平府志(點校本)" (2014), 方志出版社
- 黎平縣縣志編纂委員會辦公室, "黎平府志(點校本)" (2014), 方志出版社
- 王宗勛, "加池四合院文書考釋(1~4)" (2011), 貴州民族出版社
- 龍澤江, "九寨侗族保甲團練檔案" (2016), 貴州大學出版社
- 張應强, "淸水江文書(1집)" (2007), 廣西師範大學出版社
- 陳金全, "貴州文斗寨苗族契約法律文書匯編-姜元澤家藏契約文書" (2008), 인민출판사
- 陳金全, "貴州文斗寨苗族契約法律文書匯編-姜啓貴家藏契約文書" (2015), 인민출판사
- 정철웅, "明代 소수민족 통치의 一面 ― 黔東南 邊六衛 운용의 실상과 五開衛 款軍의 반란 ―", 동양사학연구, (143), pp.49~99 (2018), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 정철웅, "淸代 錦屛縣 加池寨의 經濟的 有力層과 少數民族 社會 ― 『淸水江文書』의 加池寨 斷賣 文書를 중심으로 ―(1)", 명청사연구, (52), pp.375~425 (2019), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 정철웅, "중국적 문화변용의 한 예 : 18세기 귀주성" (2015), 세창출판사
- 鄧剛, "從“鍬里”到“鍬家” - 淸水江下游三鍬人的移民歷史與認同建構" (2019), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 梁聰, "淸代淸水江下游村寨社會的契約規範與秩序 – 以文斗苗寨契約文書爲中心的硏究" (2008), 人民出版社
- 劉彦, "姻親與"他者"-淸水江北岸一個苗寨的歷史・權力與認同" (2019), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 李斌, "淸代淸水江流域社會變遷硏究" (2016), 貴州民族出版社
- 潘志成, "林業經營文書(淸水江文書硏究叢書)" (2012), 貴州民族出版社
- 傅慧平, "錦屛加池苗寨文書的社會人類學考察" (2019), 知識産權出版社
- 徐曉光, "款約法 – 黔東南侗族習慣法的歷史人類學考察" (2012), 廈門大學出版社
- 徐曉光, "淸水江流域傳統貿易規則與商業文化硏究" (2018), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 王宗勛, "淸水江木商古鎭 – 茅坪" (2017), 貴州民族出版社
- 程澤時, "淸水江文書之法意初探" (2011), 中國政法大學出版社
- 邱凱, "淸至民國淸水江流域的多元糾紛解決機制 – 以錦屛苗族契約文書爲硏究中心", 碩士, pp.2012
- 唐智燕, "淸水江文書疑難俗字例釋(三)-兼論民間文書標題的構擬問題", 原生態民族學刊, 7(1) (2015)
- 鄧建鵬, "淸至民國苗族林業糾紛的解決方式-以淸水江“認錯字”文書爲例", 湖北大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (4) (2013)
- 羅洪洋, "淸代黔東南錦屛苗族林業契約的糾紛解決機制", 民族硏究, (1) (2005)
- 劉珊, "淸代黔東南地區森林資源變化及其社會區域響應的初步硏究", 資源科學, 32(6) (2010)
- 劉振宇, "淸代黔東南苗族社會變遷與民間糾紛解決-以文斗寨解紛文書爲硏究對象", 江蘇警官學院學報, (3) (2011)
- 李林, "淸代武生的管理, 訓練與考課", 史學月刊, (12) (2015)
- 潘志成, "淸代貴州文斗苗族社會中林業糾紛的處理", 貴州民族硏究, (5) (2009)
- 徐曉光, "錦屛林區民間糾紛內部解決機制及與國家司法的呼應 – 解讀<淸水江文書>>中淸代民國的幾類契約", 原生態民族文化學刊, (1) (2011)
- 楊軍昌, "生態保護與資源綠色利用的民間規約及其形成機制硏究", 南京社會科學, (10) (2019)
- 王宗勛, "文斗三老家及其契約文書", 原生態文化學刊, (2) (2011)
- 張明, "雍正時期“改土歸流”與淸水江流域木材貿易發展 – 兼對張廣泗在“三江”地區設立“木市”問題的辨僞", 貴州大學學報(社會科學版), 36(2) (2018)
- 陳金全, "論淸代黔東南苗寨的糾紛解決-以文斗苗寨詞狀爲對象的硏究", 湘潭大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (1) (2010)
- 郗玉松, "改土歸流後綠營兵的布設與職能硏究 – 以湖廣土家族地區爲例", 淸史論叢, (1) (2018)
- 武內房司, "貴州苗族林業契約文書匯編(1763~1950)" (2003), 東京外國語大學國立亞非語言文化硏究所
- Stevan Harrell, "Ways of Being Ethnic in Southwest China" (2001), University of Washington Press
