淸代 淸水江 유역 移民의 재정착 전략과 국가화
Reterritorialization Strategies and Subjeting to State Control of Migrants in Qingshui River Basin during the Qing Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Previous studies on the relationship between ethnic minority societies and state power during the Ming and Qing dynasties have emphasized the confrontation between the state, which sought to expand its influence, and ethnic minority societies, that resisted it. The conflict often involved Han Chinese migrants from outside and indigenous communities. It was commonly assumed that the response of ethnic minorities would be resistance to “Sinicization” (漢化). Additionally, the changes in ethnic minority societies since the 16th century, driven by the timber trade, have not been fully considered. Therefore, this paper focuses on various aspects of the relationship between ethnic minority societies and state power through the narrative of the rise and fall of the Yao Baiwan(姚百萬) family, a representative migrant family in the Qingshui River basin, and the ‘Lawsuits over the right to trade on the Qingshui River(爭江案)’, a notable dispute over the order of the timber trade in the region. In particular, it aims to reveal the impact of social change on the relationship between ethnic minority societies and state power in the Qingshui River basin, where the timber trade flourished during the Qing dynasty due to abundant forest resources and rapidly developed into a commercial economy. To succeed in the timber trade, the Yao Baiwan family married with local ethnic minorities, relocated to trading centers, accumulated wealth, and grew to become ‘Mountain Tourists(山客)’. In their pursuit of safeguarding and expanding their wealth and interests, they employed a strategy of borrowing and utilizing state authority and power. This included participating in the Imperial Examinations (科擧) and intermarrying into bureaucratic families. The former reflects the minorization of Han Chinese migrants as a reterritorialization strategy, while the latter illustrates the voluntary and proactive subjecting of indigenized migrants to state control. The decline of the Yao family also exemplifies the voluntary and proactive subjecting of ethnic minority societies to state control, as they sought to attract state power to gain an advantage in the internal competition for economic benefits among ethnic minority groups. The ‘Lawsuits over the right to trade on the Qingshui River’ provides a typical example of planned and strategic subjecting to state control, where the state implemented a plan to efficiently measure and manage forest resources in ethnic minority areas. These diverse strategies of reterritorialisation and forms of subjecting to state control demonstrate that the penetration and expansion of state power in the Qingshui River basin occurred in various and complex ways. This included not only the Sinicization of ethnic minorities but also the minorization of Han Chinese migrants, the voluntary and proactive subjecting of ethnic minority societies to state control, and the planned and strategic state-led subjecting.
Abstract
Previous studies on the relationship between ethnic minority societies and state power during the Ming and Qing dynasties have emphasized the confrontation between the state, which sought to expand its influence, and ethnic minority societies, that resisted it. The conflict often involved Han Chinese migrants from outside and indigenous communities. It was commonly assumed that the response of ethnic minorities would be resistance to “Sinicization” (漢化). Additionally, the changes in ethnic minority societies since the 16th century, driven by the timber trade, have not been fully considered. Therefore, this paper focuses on various aspects of the relationship between ethnic minority societies and state power through the narrative of the rise and fall of the Yao Baiwan(姚百萬) family, a representative migrant family in the Qingshui River basin, and the ‘Lawsuits over the right to trade on the Qingshui River(爭江案)’, a notable dispute over the order of the timber trade in the region. In particular, it aims to reveal the impact of social change on the relationship between ethnic minority societies and state power in the Qingshui River basin, where the timber trade flourished during the Qing dynasty due to abundant forest resources and rapidly developed into a commercial economy. To succeed in the timber trade, the Yao Baiwan family married with local ethnic minorities, relocated to trading centers, accumulated wealth, and grew to become ‘Mountain Tourists(山客)’. In their pursuit of safeguarding and expanding their wealth and interests, they employed a strategy of borrowing and utilizing state authority and power. This included participating in the Imperial Examinations (科擧) and intermarrying into bureaucratic families. The former reflects the minorization of Han Chinese migrants as a reterritorialization strategy, while the latter illustrates the voluntary and proactive subjecting of indigenized migrants to state control. The decline of the Yao family also exemplifies the voluntary and proactive subjecting of ethnic minority societies to state control, as they sought to attract state power to gain an advantage in the internal competition for economic benefits among ethnic minority groups. The ‘Lawsuits over the right to trade on the Qingshui River’ provides a typical example of planned and strategic subjecting to state control, where the state implemented a plan to efficiently measure and manage forest resources in ethnic minority areas. These diverse strategies of reterritorialisation and forms of subjecting to state control demonstrate that the penetration and expansion of state power in the Qingshui River basin occurred in various and complex ways. This included not only the Sinicization of ethnic minorities but also the minorization of Han Chinese migrants, the voluntary and proactive subjecting of ethnic minority societies to state control, and the planned and strategic state-led subjecting.
참고문헌 (29)
- 貴州省編輯組, "侗族社會歷史調査" (1988), 貴州民族出版社
- 嘉靖, "思南府志", ~
- 毛奇齡, "蠻司合誌(史料總編)" (1966), 廣文書局
- 張應强, "淸水江文書, 第3輯 第1冊" (2011), 廣西師範大學出版社
- 張應强, "淸水江文書, 第3輯 第6冊" (2011), 廣西師範大學出版社
- "三營記(민간기록)", ~
- 제임스 C. 스콧, "조미아, 지배받지 않는 사람들" (2015), 삼천리
- 제임스 C. 스콧, "국가처럼 보기" (2010), 에코리브르
- 클로딘 롱바르-살몽, "중국적 문화변용의 한 예 : 18세기 귀주성" (2015), 세창출판사
- 김홍길, "명대 귀주성의 설치와 토착민의 저항", 동북아역사논총, (58), pp.64~101 (2017), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
- 김홍길, "苗糧에서 苗牆으로 ― 明代 後期 苗族의 저항과 明朝의 대책 ―", 명청사연구, (48), pp.423~454 (2017), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 김홍길, "淸代 서남지역의 목재교역과 소수민족 상인 ― 貴州 錦屛縣 지역을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (32), pp.105~141 (2009), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 이서현, "明代 土司制度 운용의 실상 ― 鎭雄府의 改土歸流와 革流歸土를 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (51), pp.201~241 (2019), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 정지호, "청대 검동남(黔東南) 지역의 개토귀류(改土歸流)와 묘족(苗族) 사회의 변화", 동북아역사논총, (58), pp.102~137 (2017), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
- 정철웅, "淸代 錦屛縣 加池寨의 經濟的 有力層과 少數民族 社會 ― 『淸水江文書』의 加池寨 斷賣 文書를 중심으로 ―(1)", 명청사연구, (52), pp.375~425 (2019), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 정철웅, "명·청 시대 호광 소수민족 지역의 토사와 국가 권력, 1368~1735" (2021), 아카넷
- 吳展淵, "明代貴州基層社會變遷與改土歸流", 黔南民族師範學院學報, (5) (2009)
- 王宗勛, "黔東南人物 1368-1911(明淸卷)" (2013)
- 王宗勛, "淸水江歷史文化探微" (2013)
- 林芊, "淸初淸水江流域的“皇木采辦”與木材貿易-淸水江文書·林契硏究", 原生態民族文化學刊, 8(2) (2016)
- 張萬東, "明淸王朝對渝東南土司統治硏究", 博士, pp.2016
- 張應强, "木材之流動-淸代淸水江下游地區的市場·權力與社會" (2006), 三聯書店
- 程澤時, "“姚百萬”誣告謀反案與交易公平", 原生態民族文化學刊, 4(2) (2012)
- Ge Zhaoguang, "What is China: Territory, Culture, and History" (2018), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
- Harold J. Wiens, "China's March Toward the Tropics" (1954), Shoe String Press
- Jodi L. Weinstein, "Empire and Identity in Guizhou : Local Resistance to Qing Expansion" (2014), University of Washington Press
- John E. Herman, "Amid the Cloud and Mist: China's Colonization of Guizhou, 1200-1700" (2007), Harvard University Press
- Michael Szonyi, "The Art of Being Governed : Everyday Politics in Late Imperial China" (2017), Princeton University Press
- Susan D. Blum, "Margins and Centers : A Decade of Publishing on China's Ethnic Minorities", The Journal of Asian Studies, 61(4) (2002)
