明 중후기의 ‘建文朝 문제’와 ‘建文實錄’ 편찬 건의
‘The Problem of the Jianwen Reign’ in the Mid and Late Ming Dynasty and the Proposal to Compile the ‘Veritable Records of the Jianwen Reign’
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One of the result of the Yongle Emperor’ usurpation was the problem of the rehabilitation of the Jianwen Emperor and the martyrs in the Mid and Late Ming Dynasty. This problem was the political problem but also the historiographic problem. This paper examines the views on the official historiography and the influence of the unofficial histories by inquiring into the proposal to compile the ‘Veritable Records of the Jianwen Reign.’ The request for the rehabilitation made a slow progress because it was related with the legitimacy of the Yongle Emperor and his heirs. On the other hand, the voluntary venerating activities and the compilation of the unofficial histories flourished. But these unofficial histories have the problem of the reliability. The proposal to compile the ‘Veritable Records of the Jianwen Reign’ also appeared and the contents of the proposal advanced in the course of time. Yang Shouchen prepared the proposal in the Hongzhi reign(1488-1505). Wang Shizhen proposed to compile as an appendix in the Longqing reign(1567-1572). Wang Zudi proposed to compile as independent style and Shen Li proposed the method of the compilation in the Wanli reign(1573-1620). Zhou Biao’s proposal advanced further in contents and methods of the compilation in the Chongzhen reign(1624-1644). They presented the reasons for the compilation such as the historical existence of the Jianwen reign, the positive factors of the Jianwen Emperor and his vassals or the legitimacy of the Jianwen reign, the compatibility of the Jianwen Emperor and the Yongle Emperor, and the problem of the unofficial histories. Especially they emphasized the compatibility of the Jianwen Emperor and the Yongle Emperor. The backgrounds of the proposals are supposed to be the personal experience of the reversal of the verdict against their fathers, the experience of the participation in the compilation projects or the study of the Ming history, the perception of the problem of the unofficial histories, and the political situation like the heir apparent problem. But it is difficult to conclude that the heir apparent problem influenced directly. The second and third, meanwhile, are directly related backgrounds. The proposals had two fundamental limits. One was the political limit. It was the incompatibility of the Jianwen Emperor and the Yongle Emperor and it was related with the legitimacy of all emperors after the Yongle Emperor. The other was the historiographic limit. It was the insufficient consideration about the contents and methods or the emphasis on the accomplishment or the great cause which made it possible to accommodate the wrong or even the fake history.
Abstract
One of the result of the Yongle Emperor’ usurpation was the problem of the rehabilitation of the Jianwen Emperor and the martyrs in the Mid and Late Ming Dynasty. This problem was the political problem but also the historiographic problem. This paper examines the views on the official historiography and the influence of the unofficial histories by inquiring into the proposal to compile the ‘Veritable Records of the Jianwen Reign.’ The request for the rehabilitation made a slow progress because it was related with the legitimacy of the Yongle Emperor and his heirs. On the other hand, the voluntary venerating activities and the compilation of the unofficial histories flourished. But these unofficial histories have the problem of the reliability. The proposal to compile the ‘Veritable Records of the Jianwen Reign’ also appeared and the contents of the proposal advanced in the course of time. Yang Shouchen prepared the proposal in the Hongzhi reign(1488-1505). Wang Shizhen proposed to compile as an appendix in the Longqing reign(1567-1572). Wang Zudi proposed to compile as independent style and Shen Li proposed the method of the compilation in the Wanli reign(1573-1620). Zhou Biao’s proposal advanced further in contents and methods of the compilation in the Chongzhen reign(1624-1644). They presented the reasons for the compilation such as the historical existence of the Jianwen reign, the positive factors of the Jianwen Emperor and his vassals or the legitimacy of the Jianwen reign, the compatibility of the Jianwen Emperor and the Yongle Emperor, and the problem of the unofficial histories. Especially they emphasized the compatibility of the Jianwen Emperor and the Yongle Emperor. The backgrounds of the proposals are supposed to be the personal experience of the reversal of the verdict against their fathers, the experience of the participation in the compilation projects or the study of the Ming history, the perception of the problem of the unofficial histories, and the political situation like the heir apparent problem. But it is difficult to conclude that the heir apparent problem influenced directly. The second and third, meanwhile, are directly related backgrounds. The proposals had two fundamental limits. One was the political limit. It was the incompatibility of the Jianwen Emperor and the Yongle Emperor and it was related with the legitimacy of all emperors after the Yongle Emperor. The other was the historiographic limit. It was the insufficient consideration about the contents and methods or the emphasis on the accomplishment or the great cause which made it possible to accommodate the wrong or even the fake history.
참고문헌 (79)
- "明史" (1974), 中華書局
- "明實錄", 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所, ~ (1962)
- "太宗實錄", ~
- "仁宗實錄", ~
- "英宗實錄", ~
- "憲宗實錄", ~
- "孝宗實錄", ~
- "神宗實錄", ~
- "喜宗實錄", ~
- "皇明寶訓", 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所, ~ (1962)
- "崇禎長篇", 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所, ~ (1962)
- 鄧士龍, "國朝典故" (1993), 北京大學出版社
- "景印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
- 萬曆, "續修四庫全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 雍正, "景印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
- 譚希思, "四庫全書存目叢書" (1996), 齊魯書社
- 屠叔方, "四庫全書存目叢書" (1996), 齊魯書社
- 潘耒, "續修四庫全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 史仲彬, "遜國逸書四種, 四庫全書存目叢書" (1996), 齊魯書社
- 沈德符, "萬曆野獲編" (1959), 中華書局
- 沈鯉, "景印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
- 吳亮, "續修四庫全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 王圻, "續修四庫全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 王士禛, "古夫于亭雜錄" (1998), 中華書局
- 王世懋, "叢書集成初編" (1937), 商務印書館
- 王世貞, "弇山堂別集" (1985), 中華書局
- 王世貞, "景印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
- 王世貞, "景印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
- 王世貞, "景印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
- 王祖嫡, "四庫未收書輯刊" (2000), 北京出版社
- 李淸, "三垣筆記" (1982), 中華書局
- 李賢, "國朝典故" (1993), 北京大學出版社
- 張居正, "張太岳集" (1984), 上海古籍出版社
- 錢謙益, "牧齋初學集" (1985), 上海古籍出版社
- 朱鷺, "四庫全書存目叢書" (1996), 齊魯書社
- 周鑣, "四庫全書存目叢書" (1996), 齊魯書社
- 陳子龍, "明經世文編" (1962), 中華書局
- 焦竑, "續修四庫全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 祝允明, "國朝典故" (1993), 北京大學出版社
- 何喬新, "景印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
- 레이 황, "1587, 만력 15년 아무 일도 없었던 해" (2004), 새물결
- 謝貴安, "明實錄硏究" (2003), 湖北人民出版社
- 楊艶秋, "明代史學探硏" (2005), 人民出版社
- 吳德義, "政局變遷與歷史敍事 : 明代建文史編纂硏究" (2013), 中國社會科學出版社
- 王崇武, "明靖難事史考證稿" (1948), 商務印書館
- 張德信, "明代職官年表" (2009), 黃山書社
- 錢茂偉, "明代史學的歷程" (2003), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 向燕南, "中國史學思想通史ㆍ明代卷" (2002), 黃山書社
- 間野潛龍, "明代文化史硏究" (1979), 同朋舍
- 小野和子, "明季黨社考—東林黨と復社" (1996), 同朋舍
- 이윤석, "‘史不當滅’과 ‘論議之公’ ― 明初 『元史』 편찬 관념의 배경과 실제 ―", 동양사학연구, (138), pp.139~184 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 郭培貴, "建文帝有實錄嗎", 殷都學刊 (2000)
- 謝貴安, "試論「明實錄」對建文帝的態度及其變化", 北京聯合大學學報(人文社會科學版), 8(3) (2010)
- 山根幸夫, "明代的會典", 明史硏究論叢, 6 (2004)
- 徐彬, "論王世貞的史學理論", 安徽師範大學學報(人文社會科學版), 32(4) (2004)
- 孫衛國, "試論王世貞的史學思想(上下)", 大陸雜誌, 101;102(6;1) (2000)
- 孫衛國, "王世貞明史硏究之成就與特點", 史學史硏究 (2004)
- 孫衛國, "16世紀兩類士大夫的代表 : 文人王世貞與相臣張居正", 中國社會歷史評論, 6 (2005)
- 孫衛國, "王世貞「史乘考誤」對「明實錄」之辨證及其影響", 成大歷史學報, 29 (2005)
- 余勁東, "從‘奸臣’到‘地方神’—明淸時期對靖難遜國臣鐵鉉的形象建構", 濟南大學學報(社會科學版), 25(1) (2015)
- 吳德義, "「奉天靖難記」的編撰與歷史書寫", 江西社會科學 (2014)
- 吳振漢, "王世貞「史乘考誤」所論嘉ㆍ隆之際史事考釋", 國立中央大學人文學報, 17 (1998)
- 吳振漢, "宋端儀「立齋閒錄」硏析", 人文學報, 27 (2003)
- 吳緝華, "明代制度史論叢" (1971), 學生書局
- 吳航, "明淸間僞書「致身錄」攷論", 淡江人文社會學刊, 43 (2010)
- 牛建强, "試論明代建文帝歷史冤案的反正過程—以明中後期建文朝史籍纂修爲視覺", 史學月刊, (2) (1996)
- 牛建强, "明人王祖嫡行實考述", 史學月刊, (4) (2013)
- 尹選波, "試論太上皇朱祁鎭的迎還及復辟", 中國人民大學學報, (2) (1995)
- 李見喜, "明建文帝正統地位恢復硏究", 碩士, pp.2016
- 錢茂偉, "國家ㆍ科擧與家族: 以明代寧波楊氏爲中心的考察", 寧波大學學報(人文科學版), 23(6) (2010)
- 丁修眞, "士人交往ㆍ地方家族與建文傳說—以「致身錄」的出現爲中心", 史林, (3) (2011)
- 丁修眞, "明代中期建文故事的整合與傳播—以黃佐「革除遺事」爲中心", 安徽史學, (6) (2012)
- 陳永福, "九十年來東林黨爭硏究方法論述評", 中國史硏究動態, (3) (2012)
- 何孝榮, "萬曆年間的‘國本’之爭", 山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (4) (1997)
- Chan, Hok-Lam(陳學霖), "Xie Jin (1369-1415) as Imperial Propagandist: His Role in the Revisions of the ‘Ming Taizu Shilu", T’oung Pao, Second Series, 91 (2005)
- Chan, Hok-lam, "The Legitimation of New Orders: Case Studies in World History" (2007), The Chinese University Press
- Ditmanson, Peter, "Death in Fidelity : Mid-and Late-Ming Reconstructions of Fang Xiaoru", Ming Studies, 45(46) (2001)
- Ditmanson, Peter, "Venerating the Martyrs of the 1402 Usurpation: History and Memory in the Mid and Late Ming Dynasty", T’oung Pao, Second Series, 93 (2007)
- Langlois, John D., "The Reversal of the Death Verdict Against Wang Shizhen’s Father", Ming Studies, 53 (2006)