淸 乾隆帝의 皇位 계승자 결정과 訓政
A Rethinking on the Decision of the Successor of Emperor Qianlong
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on how the Emperor Qianlong's succession was determined and how he operated politics after he declared his retirement, the study aims to clarify how Qing Dynasty's succession of succession was transformed. Furthermore, I would like to understand what kind of status the Emperor Qianlong had as the Emperor after the retirement. The Emperor Qianlong was the first emperor to take the throne according to the system created by the Emperor Yongzheng. However, he felt uncomfortable with the method, and the way he pursued was different from the Emperor Yongzheng’s. The Emperor Qianlong made a statement that he would transfer power after revealing who the heir was. The Emperor Qianlong used the successor decision to strengthen the emperor's power, which led to the Regent. When the Emperor Qianlong stepped down from the throne, he distinguished his role from his successor, and made regulations on it. However, the Emperor Qianlong was possessed and exercised more power than the emperor as the supreme abdicated emperor. Although the Emperor Qianlong did not plan this situation in 1778 or 1795, but it resulted in an extension of his reign. The succession of the Qing Dynasty changed from the agreement of the various Manchu nobles to the way the emperor named it. the Emperor Qianlong used a link between deciding a successor in secret and engaging in politics after abdication. The reason he didn't disclose his successor is partly to prevent bureaucrats from intervening in the issue and exerting influence. The Emperor Qianlong was more actively involved in the process of deciding heirs than any emperor of the Qing Dynasty. This was intended to intercede to the point where other emperors could not have any influence.
Abstract
Based on how the Emperor Qianlong's succession was determined and how he operated politics after he declared his retirement, the study aims to clarify how Qing Dynasty's succession of succession was transformed. Furthermore, I would like to understand what kind of status the Emperor Qianlong had as the Emperor after the retirement. The Emperor Qianlong was the first emperor to take the throne according to the system created by the Emperor Yongzheng. However, he felt uncomfortable with the method, and the way he pursued was different from the Emperor Yongzheng’s. The Emperor Qianlong made a statement that he would transfer power after revealing who the heir was. The Emperor Qianlong used the successor decision to strengthen the emperor's power, which led to the Regent. When the Emperor Qianlong stepped down from the throne, he distinguished his role from his successor, and made regulations on it. However, the Emperor Qianlong was possessed and exercised more power than the emperor as the supreme abdicated emperor. Although the Emperor Qianlong did not plan this situation in 1778 or 1795, but it resulted in an extension of his reign. The succession of the Qing Dynasty changed from the agreement of the various Manchu nobles to the way the emperor named it. the Emperor Qianlong used a link between deciding a successor in secret and engaging in politics after abdication. The reason he didn't disclose his successor is partly to prevent bureaucrats from intervening in the issue and exerting influence. The Emperor Qianlong was more actively involved in the process of deciding heirs than any emperor of the Qing Dynasty. This was intended to intercede to the point where other emperors could not have any influence.
참고문헌 (35)
- 梁章鉅, "樞垣記略", ~
- 趙翼, "簷曝雜記", ~
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "嘉慶道光兩朝上諭檔" (2000), 廣西師範大學出版社
- "國朝宮史續編" (1994), 北京古籍出版社
- "大淸十朝聖訓" (1965), 文海出版社
- "淸史稿", ~
- "淸史列傳" (1987), 中華書局
- "欽定大淸會典事例" (1976), 新文豊出版公社
- 郭成康, "乾隆正傳" (2006), 中央編譯出版社
- 郭松義, "淸朝典制" (1993), 吉林文史出版社
- 吉晨, "話說太上皇", 故宮博物院院刊, (2) (1981)
- 김창수, "19세기 전반 조선 사신의 청 정세인식- 청 황제 평가를 중심으로 -", 사학연구, (126), pp.279~314 (2017), 한국사학회
- 杜家驥, "嘉慶事典" (2010), 紫禁城出版社
- 白新良, "乾隆傳位和太上皇生活", 紫禁城, (1) (1989)
- 白新良, "論乾隆帝秘密建儲", 故宮博物院院刊 (1989)
- 白新良, "乾隆傳" (1990), 遼寧敎育出版社
- 符澤軍, "天無二日國有二君—訓政下的嘉慶帝", 黑龍江史志, (8) (2014)
- 常建華, "乾隆事典" (2010), 紫禁城出版社
- 송미령, "淸 중기 總理事務王大臣 체제와 정국운영", 동양사학연구, (124), pp.179~210 (2013), 동양사학회
- 송미령, "合議에서 指名으로― 청대 황위계승방식의 변화 ―", 이화사학연구, (32), pp.181~198 (2005), 이화사학연구소
- 楊珍, "淸朝皇位繼承制度" (2001), 學苑出版社
- 王品, "太上皇體制與乾嘉之際權力運行軌迹研究", 碩士, pp.2010
- 李鵬年, "淸宮史事" (1986), 紫禁城出版社
- 張玉芬, "乾隆建儲始末", 遼寧師範大學學報 (1988)
- 錢實甫, "淸代職官年表" (1980), 中華書局
- 朱誠如, "乾隆建儲與訓政述評", 故宮博物院院刊, 90 (2000)
- 湯玉梅, "清乾隆帝的秘密建儲與訓政", 蘭臺世界, (19) (2014)
- 馮爾康, "閑話太上皇", 故宮博物院院刊, (4) (1981)
- Daniel McMahon, "Rethinking the Decline of China's Qing Dynasty: Imperial Activism and Borderland Management at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century" (2015), Routledge
- Harold Kahn, "Monarchy in the Emperor"s Eyes : Image and Reality in the Ch"ien-lung Reign" (1971), Harvard University Press
- 마크 C. 엘리엇, "건륭제" (2011), 천지인
- Wang wensheng, "White Lotus Rebels and South China Pirates: Crisis and Reform in the Qing Empire" (2014), Harvard University Press