「爲進貢水牛角事」를 통해 본 水牛角年貢사건과 朝･淸관계의 변화
Incident of Water Bull Horn Tribute and Changes of Relationship between Chosun and Qing Dynasty through Tribute to the Bullhorn.(「爲進貢水牛角事」)
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined the process of change in the relationship between the Chosun and the Qing Dynasty through the analysis of the resolution process of the Water Buffalo Horn Tribute in the Early Qing Dynasty, which was one of the important diplomatic disputes between Chosun and Qing dynasty. Water Buffalo Horn is one of the important military items for making bows with the horns of buffalo. Incident of Water Buffalo Horn Tribute was included in the Chosun’s tribute item during the 1637 Treaty of Jeongchuk after the end of the event was later excluded from the tribute item in 1654. Until now, research on this case has been limited in grasping the whole story because it has no choice but to rely on 「禮部知會免進牛角代貢紙張咨」 and 「回咨」 in 『同文彙考』, 『通文館志』 in the historical records of the Chosun Joseon Dynasty. However, in the mid-2010s, the researcher discovered that three archives related to this incident were included among the newly released data by The First Historical Archives of China, and based on this, the discussion and resolution process within the Qing dynasty were summarized in detail. It was then revealed that the incident was deeply related to the first the Conquest to Russia, and this led to changes in relations between Chosun and Qing, including the resolution of the Incident of the declaration of crown prince.
Abstract
This study examined the process of change in the relationship between the Chosun and the Qing Dynasty through the analysis of the resolution process of the Water Buffalo Horn Tribute in the Early Qing Dynasty, which was one of the important diplomatic disputes between Chosun and Qing dynasty. Water Buffalo Horn is one of the important military items for making bows with the horns of buffalo. Incident of Water Buffalo Horn Tribute was included in the Chosun’s tribute item during the 1637 Treaty of Jeongchuk after the end of the event was later excluded from the tribute item in 1654. Until now, research on this case has been limited in grasping the whole story because it has no choice but to rely on 「禮部知會免進牛角代貢紙張咨」 and 「回咨」 in 『同文彙考』, 『通文館志』 in the historical records of the Chosun Joseon Dynasty. However, in the mid-2010s, the researcher discovered that three archives related to this incident were included among the newly released data by The First Historical Archives of China, and based on this, the discussion and resolution process within the Qing dynasty were summarized in detail. It was then revealed that the incident was deeply related to the first the Conquest to Russia, and this led to changes in relations between Chosun and Qing, including the resolution of the Incident of the declaration of crown prince.
참고문헌 (42)
- 郞丘, "爲進貢水牛角事", 中國第一歷史檔案館, ~
- 額赫里, "题議派漢軍炮手至寧古塔并請朝鲜兵丁教習當地兵丁使用鳥槍", 中國第一歷史檔案館, ~
- "大淸歷朝實錄", 中國第一歷史檔案館, ~
- 朝鮮 承文院, "同文彙考", 서울大學校 奎章閣韓國學硏究院, ~
- 朝鮮 備邊司, "備邊司謄錄", 서울大學校 奎章閣韓國學硏究院, ~
- 朝鮮 司譯院, "通文館志", ~
- 朝鮮 承政院, "承政院日記", 서울大學校 奎章閣韓國學硏究院, ~
- "朝鮮王朝實錄", 서울大學校 奎章閣韓國學硏究院, ~
- 巴哈納, "題报本年八旗滿蒙汉军人丁数目事", 中國第一歷史檔案館, ~
- 구범진, "청나라, 키메라의 제국" (2012), 민음사
- 구범진, "병자호란, 홍타이지의 전쟁" (2019), 까치
- Mark C. Elliott, "만주족의 청제국" (2009), 푸른역사
- 계승범, "17세기 중반 나선정벌의 추이와 그 동아시아적 의미", 사학연구, (110), pp.205~246 (2013), 한국사학회
- 계승범, "러시아 자료로 본 1650년대 흑룡강원정(나선정벌)", 열상고전연구, (65), pp.139~168 (2018), 열상고전연구회[DOI]
- 구도영, "16세기 조선 대명對明 사행무역使行貿易의수입품과 그 전개양상", 국학연구, (34), pp.709~765 (2017), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
- 구도영, "16세기 對明 私貿易의 정책 방향과 굴레 - 中宗代 明의 ‘조선사행단 출입제한 조치’를 중심으로 -", 조선시대사학보, (62), pp.211~249 (2012), 조선시대사학회
- 김경록, "17세기 朝淸관계와‘倭情’의 군사외교적 활용", 군사, (94), pp.205~245 (2015), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 김경록, "17세기 중반 동북아 국제정세와 조선의 나선정벌", 열상고전연구, (65), pp.11~51 (2018), 열상고전연구회[DOI]
- 김동우, "조선 초기 교린체제와 남방무역", 석사, pp.2021
- 金東哲, "朝鮮後期 水牛角貿易과 弓角契貢人", 韓國文化硏究, 4 (1991)
- 金柄夏, "乙卯倭變考", 탐라문화, (8) (1989)
- 김영록, "17세기 전반 왜관 개시무역의 거래 양상과 부채 문제", 역사와경계, (121), pp.269~299 (2021), 부산경남사학회[DOI]
- 金永淑, "會寧開市에 關한 硏究", 論文集 (1979)
- 김우진, "조선 전기 軍器寺의 冷兵器 제작과 관리－弓矢類를 중심으로", ~ (2022)
- 김윤순, "淸初 만주 흥기 속의 잉굴다이", 인문과학연구, (73), pp.173~193 (2022), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- 唐烈, "試羅禪征伐對當時東北亞局勢的影向", 延邊大學學報 (2017)
- 박지배, "17세기 중반 러시아의 동북아진출과 ‘나선정벌’의 의미", 역사학보, (240), pp.637~672 (2018), 역사학회[DOI]
- 謝桂娟, "華夷觀視覺下的中朝宗藩关系-以明清時期爲例", 韓國歷史研究, 240 (2015)
- 송미령, "淸初 정책 결정기구 속의 滿洲人", 만주연구, (14), pp.75~107 (2012), 만주학회[DOI]
- 신세완, "조선후기 中江開市의 운영 양상과 매매물화", 역사와 세계, 61, pp.169~208 (2022), 효원사학회[DOI]
- 심민정, "삼포왜란의 발생원인과 대마도", 동북아 문화연구, 1(34), pp.67~84 (2013), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 양태진, "350년 전(1654년)의 나선정벌을 생각한다 <上>", 北韓 (2005)
- 양흥숙, "1541년 두 ‘倭變’과 ‘辛丑禁條’", 한일관계사연구, (71), pp.285~324 (2021), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
- 유지원, "전쟁(戰爭)과 무역(貿易) : 동북아 국제질서 재편에 나타난 후금(後金)과 조선의 관계", 한중관계연구, 7(3), pp.157~177 (2021), 한중관계연구원[DOI]
- 윤여석, "壬辰倭亂期 軍需物資 확보와 軍需交易의 영향", 석사, 사학과, pp.2012
- 윤호랑, "효종의 북벌정책과 나선정벌의 역사적 성격에 대한 재검토", 군사연구, (129), pp.215~240 (2010), 육군군사연구소[DOI]
- 李泰鎭, "小氷期(1500-1750) 천변재이 연구와 《朝鮮王朝實錄》", 歷史學報, 149 (1996)
- 이현아, "조선전기 수우각궁과 수우각 확보 노력", 석사, pp.2019
- 曺永祿, "수우각 무역을 통해 본 鮮明關係", 동국사학 (1966)
- 홍 은, "清代羅禪征伐文献研究以承政院日記爲中心", 석사, pp.2015
- 홍은, "額赫里의 檔案으로 보는 청･러 국경분쟁 초기 漢軍八旗軍 상황과 조선을 통한 문제 해결", 동아인문학, (44), pp.71~102 (2018), 동아인문학회[DOI]
- 홍은, "도니당안으로 본 청-러 국경분쟁 초기 전황과 청 조정의 결정", 만주연구, (35), pp.201~227 (2023), 만주학회[DOI]