본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아어 양보구문 연구 - 대조개념을 중심으로

A study on the concessive construction in Russian - Focused on the Concept of Contrast

김정일
한국러시아문학회 (The Korean Association Of Rusists)|2008.06|러시아어문학연구논집 (Russian Language and Literature)|제28호|pp. 95-122|DOI 10.24066/russia.2008..28.005

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

보상대조contrastcompensationconcessive constructioncontrastive constructionontological dimensionepistemic dimension양보구문대조구문존재적 차원인식적 차원
주제분류러시아어와문학

초록

This study tries to show the characteristics of the concepts of contrast through the two contrastive conjucts “зато” and “но” which express concessive meaning. "Зато" contrasts two aspects of an object or two independent situations, in which the undesirable aspects of an objects or situation are followed by the desirable aspect of an object or situation and compensated by them. In many previous works, it was shown that typical "несмотря на" and "хотя” concessive constructions can be replaced by contrastive “но” constructions. But in my opinion it is just analogy caused by regarding two different aspects of "contrast" on the same dimension. Because contrast acts on the different dimensions in concessive constructions and contrastive constructions. In the concessive construtions, the concept of contrast is presented, while in the contrastive constructions, the concept of contrast is asserted. Cause-effect relations in the concessive constructions is based on the topos which is located independently from the linguistic structure and can be decided according to the shared knowledge between speaker and hearers, while cause-effect relations in the contrastive constructions is based on the intra-textual structure and moreover it is decided by speaker's the subjective attitude toward the situations. The reason why, in some cases, contrastive meanings are understanded as concessive meaning is that the concepts of contrast and cause-effect relations which are common elements of both constructions, are considered to act on the same dimension.

Abstract

This study tries to show the characteristics of the concepts of contrast through the two contrastive conjucts “зато” and “но” which express concessive meaning. "Зато" contrasts two aspects of an object or two independent situations, in which the undesirable aspects of an objects or situation are followed by the desirable aspect of an object or situation and compensated by them. In many previous works, it was shown that typical "несмотря на" and "хотя” concessive constructions can be replaced by contrastive “но” constructions. But in my opinion it is just analogy caused by regarding two different aspects of "contrast" on the same dimension. Because contrast acts on the different dimensions in concessive constructions and contrastive constructions. In the concessive construtions, the concept of contrast is presented, while in the contrastive constructions, the concept of contrast is asserted. Cause-effect relations in the concessive constructions is based on the topos which is located independently from the linguistic structure and can be decided according to the shared knowledge between speaker and hearers, while cause-effect relations in the contrastive constructions is based on the intra-textual structure and moreover it is decided by speaker's the subjective attitude toward the situations. The reason why, in some cases, contrastive meanings are understanded as concessive meaning is that the concepts of contrast and cause-effect relations which are common elements of both constructions, are considered to act on the same dimension.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 길윤미, "러시아어 양보구문에 대한 담화 기능적 연구", 박사, pp.2007
  2. 길윤미, "러시아어 양보구문-그 유형화를 통한 접근", 러시아어문학연구논집, 27, pp.203~232 (2008)
  3. 김정일, "러시아어 Если 조건문 연구", 박사, pp.2002
  4. 송은지, "현대 러시아어에서 접속사 A와 Но", 러시아연구, 11(1), pp.97~127
  5. 서정섭, "국어 양보문 연구" (1991), 한신문화사
  6. 이기웅, "러시아어에 있어서 전제와 아나포라", 러시아어문학 연구논집, 9(1), pp.311~334 (2001), 한국러시아문학회
  7. 이기웅, "텍스트화와 러시아 언어-문화 공간의 토포스:러시아어 “프라브다” 토포스를 중심으로", 러시아연구, 17(2), pp.241~268 (2007), 러시아연구소
  8. Апресян В.Ю., "Уступительность в языке и слова со значением уступки", Вопросы языкознания, 5, pp.24~44 (1999)
  9. Апресян В.Ю., ""Семантические особенности концепта 'уступки' (на материале синонимов в то же время2, вместе с тем, при этом 2, при всем том),"? Труды международного семинара ≪диалог 2000≫? по компьютерной лингвистике и её приложения. Под ред. А.С.Нариньяни", ~ (2000)
  10. Апресян В.Ю., "Семантический инвариант уступительности и смысловая структура уступительных слов," Лингвистическая теория и толковая лексикография. Отв. Ред. А.М. Молдаван. М", ~ (2003)
  11. Апресян В.Ю., "."Уступительность: Языковые связи," Сокровенные смыслы. Сб. Ст. В честь Н.Д.Арутюновой. Под. Ред. Ю.Д. Апресяна. М", ~ (2004)
  12. Апресян В.Ю., "'Компенсация' и 'Оговорка' в русской языковой картине мира" Русский язык сегодня 3. Проблемы русской лексикографии. Под. Ред. Л.П. Крысина. М. С", ~ (2004)
  13. Апресян В.Ю., "Словарная статья всё-таки1,” Новый объяснительныйсловарь синонимов русского языка", ~ (2004)
  14. Апресян В.Ю., "Словарная статья как-никак1,” Новый объяснительный словарь синонимов русского языка", ~ (2004)
  15. Апресян В.Ю., "Словарная статья Хотя1,” Новый объяснительный словарь синонимов русского языка", ~ (2004)
  16. Апресян В.Ю., "Трехвалентные уступительные слова” Труды международного семинара ≪диалог 2005≫ по компьютерной лингвистике и её приложения. 2005 http:", Archive, pp.2005, Apresjan[DOI]
  17. Апресян В.Ю., "Уступительность в языке”. Языковая картина мира и системная лексикография. М.: Языки славянских культур", ~ (2006)
  18. Грамматика русского языка, "Т.1. Фонетика и морфология. М", ~ (1960)
  19. Грамматика русского языка, "Т.2. Синтаксис. Ч.2. М", ~ (1960)
  20. "Грамматика современного русского литературного языка. М" (1970), Наука
  21. Караулов Ю.Н., "Русский язык: энциклопедия. М" (1997), Дрофа
  22. Ляпон М.В., "Смысловая структура сложного предложения и текст. К? типологии внутритекстовых отношений. М", ~ (1986)
  23. Николаева Т.М., "“Хотя и хоть в исторической перспктиве,” Славянские этюды. Сб. К юбилею С.М. Толстой. М", ~ (1999)
  24. Николаева Т.М., "Фужерон И.И. “Некоторые наблюдения над семантикой и статусом сложных предложений с уступительным?? и союзами. Вербальная и невербальная опоры пространств межфразовых связей,” Отв. Ред. Т.М.Николаева. М", ~ (2004)
  25. Перфильева Н.П., "Уступительно-противительые конструкции с? двусторонней связью в овременном русском языке: Автореф. Дисс....канд. филол. Наук. Томск", ~ (1984)
  26. Русская Грамматика, "Том 2" (1980), Наука
  27. Санников В., "З. Русские сочинительные конструкции: семантика, прагматика, синтаксис. М", ~ (1989)
  28. Теремова Р.М., "Семантика уступительности и её выражение в? современном русском языке. Л", ~ (1986)
  29. Урысон Е.В., "Союз ≪хотя≫ сквозь призму семантических? примитивов", Вопросы языкозниния, 6, pp.35~54 (2002)
  30. Урысон Е.В., "Семантическая и валентная структура сло с? уступительнымзначиния", Русский язык в научном освещении, 6, pp.217~246 (2003)
  31. Урысон Е.В., "“Союз ≪но≫, или что такое ≪обманутое ожидание≫,”? Труды международной конференции “ДИАЛОГ 2005”, 2005 Храковский В.В. “Уступительные предложения в системе? импликативных конструкций,” Общее языкознание и теория грамматики. СПб,: Наука", ~ (1998)
  32. Урысон Е.В., "Универсальные уступительные конструкции", Вопросы языкознания, 1, pp.103~122 (1999)
  33. Урысон Е.В., "Уступительные конструкции: семантика, синтаксис, типология,” Типология уступительных конструкций. Санкт-Петербург.: Наука", ~ (2004)
  34. Яковлева Е.С., "Фрагменты русской языковой картины мира (модели пространства, времени и восприятия" (1994), Гнозис
  35. Anscombre, "L'argementation dans la langue.젨?Bruxelles: Mardaga", ~
  36. Apresjan, V, "Language-Specific Rhetoric Strategies: the Russian Concept of 'Concession'.http:", program, pp.aatseel, 2003[DOI]
  37. Couper-Kuhlen E, ""Concessive patterns in?Conversation," In E. ouper-Kuhlen and B.Kortmann (eds).젨젨젨 Cause-Condition-Concession-Contrast. Berlin", New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000
  38. Jespersen, O, "The Philosophy of Grammar" (1924), George Allen &?Unwin
  39. K?ig E, "Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessive: Areas of?contrast, overlap and neutralization" (1986), Cambridge University Press
  40. Quirk, "A Comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
  41. Quirk, "A Grammar of Contemporary English" (1986), Longman
  42. Rudolph, E, "(1996) Contrast. Adversative and Concessive?Relations and their Expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese on Sentence and Text Level.?Walter de Gruyter. Berlin, N.Y", ~ (1996)
  43. Sweetser E, "From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and?Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  44. Yokoyama, Olga, "On Sentence Coordination in Russian: A Functional?Approach", Regional Meeting of Chicago?Linguistic Society, 통권 : 17th, pp.431~438

관련 논문AI추천

러시아어 양보구문 - 그 유형화를 통한 접근길윤미한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2008 · 제27호러시아어에서 부정의 영향권 연구 : 부정어의 위치와 부정 영향권의 상관관계를 중심으로길윤미한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2021 · 제75호Use of Concessive and Contrastive Constructions in English and Korean조영순한국언어학회 · 언어2009 · 제34권 제1호러시아어 단문에서 나타난 조건관계의 의미구조이남경외국학연구소 · 외국학연구2018 · 제44호현대러시아어의 대조화제와 ‘화제성’송은지러시아연구소 · 러시아연구2007 · 제17권 제2호러시아어 абы 구문의 인지언어학적 연구안혁한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2022 · 제78호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

레프 톨스토이와 아나키즘심성보pp. 9-34심상치 않은 일상 - 체호프와 아쿠닌의 희곡『갈매기』오종우pp. 35-52«Голубая речка...»(Образы природы в поздней лирике Георгия Иванова)Лопачева М.К.pp. 53-70Изменение языка в диахроническом аспекте — на материале форм местоименных прилагательных в именительном и винительном падежах множественного числа김용화pp. 71-94러시아어 대화에서의 타인 발화 반복표현에 대하여 - 담화 상 즉각적인 응답을 중심으로박혜옥pp. 123-154
원문 보기