러시아어 미래시제의 양상적 추론
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to explain the semantic correlation between future tense and modality and to analyze the modal meaning of Russian future tense. The future may be thought to be the most modal. The future tense is rarely temporal concept, it necessarily involves an element of intention, indication and prediction. Depending on the modal inference, russian future tense would be grouped as non-epistemic or epistemic. The future tenses with a non-epistemic modal inference express participant- internal necessity and participant-external necessity. The future tense with meaning of participant-internal necessity expresses volition and intention, the future tense with meaning of participant-external necessity expresses order. The kind of epistemic modal inferences may be distinguished as certainty and possibility. In order to interpret modal inference of future tense, we have to consider the nature of subject and action. The sentences with meaning of intention could be expressed by animate, referential subject and controllable and voluntary act. But subject of sentences with epistemic inference can be all person, non-animate and non-referential. Most modal inferences occur with either perfective present and imperfective future. The function of aspects is modification of the degree of strength of modal inference. And it is because imperfective aspects are linked to the reference time in context, while the interpretation of perfective aspects is incompatible with a simultaneous epistemic evaluation time.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explain the semantic correlation between future tense and modality and to analyze the modal meaning of Russian future tense. The future may be thought to be the most modal. The future tense is rarely temporal concept, it necessarily involves an element of intention, indication and prediction. Depending on the modal inference, russian future tense would be grouped as non-epistemic or epistemic. The future tenses with a non-epistemic modal inference express participant- internal necessity and participant-external necessity. The future tense with meaning of participant-internal necessity expresses volition and intention, the future tense with meaning of participant-external necessity expresses order. The kind of epistemic modal inferences may be distinguished as certainty and possibility. In order to interpret modal inference of future tense, we have to consider the nature of subject and action. The sentences with meaning of intention could be expressed by animate, referential subject and controllable and voluntary act. But subject of sentences with epistemic inference can be all person, non-animate and non-referential. Most modal inferences occur with either perfective present and imperfective future. The function of aspects is modification of the degree of strength of modal inference. And it is because imperfective aspects are linked to the reference time in context, while the interpretation of perfective aspects is incompatible with a simultaneous epistemic evaluation time.
참고문헌 (29)
- 이기용, "시제와 양상" (1998), 태학사
- 이남경, "러시아어 양상술어의 의미 확장과 다기능성", 러시아어문학연구논집, (34), pp.203~234 (2010), 한국러시아문학회
- 홍종림, "-겠-의 의미", 어문집, 22, pp.301~318 (1985)
- Арутюнова Н.Д., "Время: модели и метафоры, In Логический анализ языка: Язык и время", pp.51~61 (1997), Индрик
- Бондарко А.В., "Вид и время русского глагола" (1971), Просвещение
- Голованова И.П., "Точечные и интервальные семантики для модальных и временных систем, In Автореферат" (1994), Москва
- Ипатова Л.В., "Семантико-грамматическая связь аналитических средств выражения понятий модальности и будущности в английском, французском и русском языке, In Сравнительный анализ", pp.2~95 (2003)
- Логунов Т.А., "Аналитические формы будущего времени как лингви- стический феномен на материале английского и русского языков", pp.41~75 (2007)
- Парешнев, Е.Ю., "Аспектуальная характеристика высказываний с формами сложного будущего времени в современном русском языке" (2004)
- "Русская Грамматика. 2" (1980), Наука
- Boland, A., "Aspect, Tense and Modality: Theory, Typology, Acquisition. Vol. 1" (2006), University of Amsterdam
- 최순자, "Modality in grammar and discourse" (1995), J. Benjamins
- Bybee, J., "The Evolution of Grammar : Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Celle, A., "Tense, modality and commitment in modes of mixed enunciation", Belgian Journal of Linguistics, pp.15~36 (2008)
- Comrie, B, "Tense" (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Cover R. T., "Aspect, Modality and Tense in Badiaranke", pp.2010
- Fleischman, S, "The Future in Thought and Language" (1982), Cambridge University Press
- Forsyth, J, "A Grammar of Aspect" (1970), Cambridge University Press
- Grenoble, L., "Tense, mood, aspect: The future in Russian", Russian Linguistics, 13(2), pp.97~110 (1989)
- de Haan, F., "Typological approaches to modality, In The Expression of Modality", pp.27~69 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Jaszczolt, K. M, "Representing time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Lindenlaub, J., "How to talk about the future", ASSIDUE, 22, pp.7~33 (2006)
- Lyons, J., "Semantics 2" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Mezhevich, I, "A feature-theoretic account of tense and aspect in Russian", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, pp.359~401 (2008)
- Palmer, F, "Mood and Modality" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Trnavac, R., "Aspect and Subjectivity in Modal Constructions" (2006), LOT
- The nature of future tenses, "Ultan, R.", 83~123, pp.Working Papers on Language Universals. 8 (1972)
- Van der Auwera, J., "Modality’s semantic map", Linguistic Typology, 2, pp.79~124 (1996)
- Waring, A, "The Modality of the future tense in Russian", The Slavonic East Review, 58(2), pp.161~181 (1980)