친일파시즘문학과 전통주의
Pro-Japanese Fascist Literature and Traditionalism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this essay is to discuss relation between “traditionalism” and “pro-japanese fascist literature”. In particular to target in the 1930's is not just because fascism in Japan was being reinforced at that time but because it was when characteristics of traditionalism were quite clear. But this essay doesn't assume that colonists ethnocentric traditionalism was become resistant nationalism against a ruler. Discussion about tradition in the 1930's contains rather a lot of possibilies to be connected with fascism(particulary modern overcoming thought in Japan). It is widely known that traditionalism in the 1930's is closely connected with the stream of the modern times, ‘overcoming of western modernism’. Traditionalism is a idea to pursue basically making tradition valuable and its necessity means that existing ideas and conception lose their dignity. Tradition at those days was also found in respect to “creation of a new principle” for modern overcoming. It's clear that the reason that discussion about tradition couldn't be absorbed was compulsive situation such as a new system or total offensive system. But discussion on tradition which appeared by taking advantage of the condition that the cognitive foundation on western modernism began to wobble couldn't help being closely linked with Japanese modern overcoming thought.
Abstract
The main purpose of this essay is to discuss relation between “traditionalism” and “pro-japanese fascist literature”. In particular to target in the 1930's is not just because fascism in Japan was being reinforced at that time but because it was when characteristics of traditionalism were quite clear. But this essay doesn't assume that colonists ethnocentric traditionalism was become resistant nationalism against a ruler. Discussion about tradition in the 1930's contains rather a lot of possibilies to be connected with fascism(particulary modern overcoming thought in Japan). It is widely known that traditionalism in the 1930's is closely connected with the stream of the modern times, ‘overcoming of western modernism’. Traditionalism is a idea to pursue basically making tradition valuable and its necessity means that existing ideas and conception lose their dignity. Tradition at those days was also found in respect to “creation of a new principle” for modern overcoming. It's clear that the reason that discussion about tradition couldn't be absorbed was compulsive situation such as a new system or total offensive system. But discussion on tradition which appeared by taking advantage of the condition that the cognitive foundation on western modernism began to wobble couldn't help being closely linked with Japanese modern overcoming thought.
참고문헌 (63)
- "문장", ~
- "인문평론", ~
- "제일선", ~
- "비판", ~
- "동광", ~
- "삼천리", ~
- "신동아", ~
- "중앙", ~
- "호남평론", ~
- "조광", ~
- "신시대", ~
- "총동원", ~
- "조선일보", ~
- "조선중앙일보", ~
- "동아일보", ~
- 김병걸, "친일문학작품선집 1, 2" (1986), 실천문학사
- 김수용, "유럽의 파시즘-이데올로기와 문화" (2001), 서울대학교 출판부
- 김재용, "협력과 저항" (2004), 소명
- 서동만, "파시즘연구" (1983), 거름
- 송민호, "일제말암흑기문학연구" (1991), 새문사
- 임종국, "친일문학론" (1966), 평화출판사
- 임지현, "대중독재-강제와 동의 사이에서" (2004), 책세상
- 임지현, "대중독재-정치 종교와 헤게모니" (2006), 책세상
- 조선문학가동맹, "건설기의 조선문학" (1946)
- 최재서, "전환기의 조선문학" (2006), 영남대학교출판부
- 河上徹太郞, "지적협력회의 근대의 초극" (1943), 창원사
- 丸山眞男, "현대정치의 사상과 행동" (1997), 한길사
- 廣松涉, "근대초극론" (2003), 민음사
- 柄谷行人, "언어와 비극" (2004), 도서출판 b
- 柄谷行人, "역사와 반복" (2008), 도서출판 b
- 吉田, "일본의 군대" (2005), 논형
- 鶴見俊輔, "전향-쓰루미 순스케의 전시기 일본 정신사 강의 1931-1945" (2005), 논형
- 子安宣邦, "일본근대사상비판" (2007), 역사비평사
- 藤田省三, "전체주의의 시대경험" (1998), 창작과비평사
- Arendt Hannah, "폭력의 세기" (1999), 이후
- David Claude, "히틀러와 나치즘" (1983), 탐구당
- Fromm Erich, "자유로부터의 도피" (1997), 계명대학교출판부
- Hauser Arnold, "문학과 예술의 사회사-현대편" (1974), 창작과비평사
- Hobsbawm Eric, "만들어진 전통" (2004), 휴머니스트
- Hobsbawm Eric, "극단의 시대:20세기의 역사(상‧하)" (1997), 까치
- Kitchen Martin, "파시즘" (1988), 이론과실천
- Neocleus Mark, "파시즘" (2002), 이후
- Passmore Kevin, "파시즘" (2002), 뿌리와이파리
- Paxton Robert O., "파시즘" (2005), 교양인
- Peukert Detlev, "나치 시대의 일상사" (2003), 개마고원
- Mosse George L., "대중의 국민화" (2008), 소나무
- Neurohr jean F., "제3제국의 신화-나치즘의 정신사" (1981), 한길사
- Reich Wilhelm, "파시즘의 대중심리" (2006), 그린비
- Rrnan Ernest, "민족주의란 무엇인가" (2002), 책세상
- Rousso Henry, "비시신드롬" (2006), 휴머니스트
- Shils Edward, "전통-변하는 것과 변하지 않는 것" (1992), 민음사
- Ortega Y Gasset José, "예술의 비인간화" (2004), 고려대학교출판부
- 김명인, "친일문학 재론 - 두 개의 강박을 넘어서", 한국근대문학연구, 1(17), pp.257~294 (2008), 한국근대문학회
- 김효신, "이탈리아 파시즘의 이입 양상- 일제 강점기를 중심으로 -", 이탈리아어문학, (19), pp.47~96 (2006), 한국이탈리아어문학회
- 류보선, "친일문학의 역사철학적 맥락", 한국근대문학연구, 4(1), pp.8~39 (2003)
- 방민호, "일제말기 문학인들의 대일 협력 유형과 의미", 한국현대문학연구, (22), pp.231~280 (2007), 한국현대문학회
- 전성곤, "토속의 발견 논리와 타자인식 - 도리이 류조를 중심으로-", 日本語文學, 1(33), pp.427~446 (2007), 한국일본어문학회
- 차승기, "1930년대 후반 전통론 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 최석영, "1920년대 일제의 무속통제책", 일본사상, (2), pp.157~183 (2000)
- 최석영, "일제 식민지 상황에서의 부여(扶餘) 고적에 대한 재해석과 '관광명소'화", 비교문화연구, 9(2), pp.109~137 (2003), 비교문화연구소
- 하정일, "한국 근대문학 연구와 탈식민 '친일문학' 문제를 중심으로", 민족문학사연구, 23, pp.10~36 (2003), 민족문학사학회
- 황종연, "한국 문학의 근대와 반근대", 박사, pp.1992
- 홍기돈, "대척점에 선 친일문학 연구의 두 경향-지적 식민주의자 비판", 실천문학, (80), pp.39~57 (2005)