최재서의 ‘질서의 문학’과 친일파시즘
‘Literature of the Order’ and Pro-Japanese Fascism
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Choi, jae-seo is a problematic figure in the history of korean literature. First, because he was Leading figures of literary Criticism after dissolution of KAPF in the 1930s. And in the next, late colonial period, he was fascist literature related to the pro-japanese. The purpose of this essay is to discuss the relation between Choi, jae-seo's 'Literature of the order' and 'Pro-japanese fascism'. Both are closely related. As it is known, he is the most popular literary characters are referred to as pro-japanese fascist in Korea Arts. He began working criticism in the mid-1930s. In general, the intellectualism criticism is said to have introduced. And he is to develop a 'Nation-state literature(kukminmunhak, 국민문학)' that Japan's total war system was backed in the late colonial period. He claimed that Intellectualist criticism in the mid-1930s. Because he decided that the collapse of a colonial korean tradition and order are. Thus he thought that literature should have the critical attitude, that 'universal order' does not exist in reality. This exemplifies the dilemma of his critical. The main concepts of his intellectualist Criticism, 'intelligence' and 'moral' was the double standards for evaluating works of literature. But he thought that as the power of intellect could not create a universal order. And they could not achieve a communal sensibility. It is very important for him to understand. He has a desire to achieve ‘the organic order’ that harmony between personality and the whole. But the modern world was where the realization of universal order was impossible. By this dilemma, he is willing to accept that the control and training at the end of colonial. (Kyungpook National University)
Abstract
Choi, jae-seo is a problematic figure in the history of korean literature. First, because he was Leading figures of literary Criticism after dissolution of KAPF in the 1930s. And in the next, late colonial period, he was fascist literature related to the pro-japanese. The purpose of this essay is to discuss the relation between Choi, jae-seo's 'Literature of the order' and 'Pro-japanese fascism'. Both are closely related. As it is known, he is the most popular literary characters are referred to as pro-japanese fascist in Korea Arts. He began working criticism in the mid-1930s. In general, the intellectualism criticism is said to have introduced. And he is to develop a 'Nation-state literature(kukminmunhak, 국민문학)' that Japan's total war system was backed in the late colonial period. He claimed that Intellectualist criticism in the mid-1930s. Because he decided that the collapse of a colonial korean tradition and order are. Thus he thought that literature should have the critical attitude, that 'universal order' does not exist in reality. This exemplifies the dilemma of his critical. The main concepts of his intellectualist Criticism, 'intelligence' and 'moral' was the double standards for evaluating works of literature. But he thought that as the power of intellect could not create a universal order. And they could not achieve a communal sensibility. It is very important for him to understand. He has a desire to achieve ‘the organic order’ that harmony between personality and the whole. But the modern world was where the realization of universal order was impossible. By this dilemma, he is willing to accept that the control and training at the end of colonial. (Kyungpook National University)
참고문헌 (39)
- "문장, 인문평론, 국민문학", ~
- 고봉준, "지성주의 파탄과 국민문학론", 한국시학연구, (17), pp.5~30 (2006), 한국시학회
- 廣松涉, "근대초극론" (2003), 민음사
- 구모룡, "파시즘미학의 본질" (2009), 예옥
- 김동식, "최재서 문학비평연구", 석사, pp.1993
- 김명인, "친일문학 재론 - 두 개의 강박을 넘어서", 한국근대문학연구, 1(17), pp.257~294 (2008), 한국근대문학회
- 김병걸, "친일문학작품선집 1, 2" (1986), 실천문학사
- 김예림, "‘동아’라는 시뮬라크르 혹은 그 접속자들의 문화 이념－1930년대 후반 최재서·백철의 문화론을 중심으로", 상허학보, 23, pp.201~219 (2008), 상허학회
- 김윤식, "한국근대작가론고" (1974), 일지사
- 김재용, "협력과 저항" (2004), 소명출판
- 김흥규, "문학과 역사적 인간" (1980), 창작과 비평사
- 류보선, "1930년대 후반기 문학비평연구", 박사, pp.1996
- 박노현, "내선인과 국민문학 : 신민족에 의한 신문학 고안의 기획", 한국어문학연구, 42, pp.253~270 (2004), 한국어문학연구학회
- 송병삼, "1930년대 후반 ‘비평의 기능’ ―『인문평론』의 문화담론을 중심으로", 현대문학이론연구, (34), pp.299~327 (2008), 현대문학이론학회
- 신재기, "한국 근대 문학비평론 연구" (1996), 고려대학교민족문화연구소
- 신철하, "근대적 이성과 훼손된 지성 -전형기비평의 두 초상", 비평문학, (29), pp.189~213 (2008), 한국비평문학회
- 윤대석, "식민지 국민문학론" (2006), 역락
- 이양숙, "최재서 문학비평 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 이양숙, "일제 말기 비평의 존재양상 － 최재서의 ‘국민문학론’을 중심으로 －", 비평문학, (28), pp.191~210 (2008), 한국비평문학회
- 이원동, "완전한 존재를 향한 불가능한 꿈 - 최재서의 ‘국민문학’ 담론의 심리 구조 -", 어문론총, (52), pp.261~285 (2010), 한국문학언어학회
- 이은애, "최재서 문학론 연구", 박사, pp.1995
- 임종국, "친일문학론" (1966), 평화출판사
- 최재서, "문학과 지성" (1938), 인문사
- 최재서, "문학원론" (1957), 춘조사
- 최재서, "최재서평론집" (1961), 청운출판사
- 최재서, "문학원론(증보판)" (1962), 춘조사
- 최재서, "인상과 사색" (1977), 연세대학교 출판부
- 최재서, "전환기의 조선문학" (2006), 영남대학교출판부
- 하정일, "한국 근대문학 연구와 탈식민 '친일문학' 문제를 중심으로", 민족문학사연구, 23, pp.10~36 (2003), 민족문학사학회
- 홍기돈, "대척점에 선 친일문학 연구의 두 경향-지적 식민주의자 비판", 실천문학, (겨울)통권 : 80, pp.39~57 (2005)
- 三原芳秋, "崔載瑞のOrder", 사이, (4), pp.291~360 (2010)
- 河上徹太郞, "지적협력회의 근대의 초극" (1943), 창원사
- Kitchen Martin, "파시즘" (1988), 이론과실천
- Mosse George L, "대중의 국민화" (2008), 소나무
- Neocleus Mark, "파시즘" (2002), 이후
- Passmore Kevin, "파시즘" (2002), 뿌리와이파리
- Paxton Robert O, "파시즘" (2005), 교양인
- Peukert Detlev, "나치 시대의 일상사" (2003), 개마고원
- Reich Wilhelm, "파시즘의 대중심리" (2006), 그린비