본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대화의 회고적 기능에서 살펴본 응답어 ‘네’ 연구

The Study about the Responsive Words 'Ne' in the Backward Looking Function of the Conversation

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

A conversation in each utterances is not organized individually but is realized in the relationship of lead-lag utterances. That is, speech act can be response about preceding speech act or preceding utterances which is about a next following speech act. A responsive word 'Ne' which is deal in this study is a response about preceding utterances which is done previously or a stimulation which is about a next following speech act. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to understand the pragmatic characteristics of 'Ne' as response speech on retrospective function for conversation and to type them, and on the ground of it, identify the type of preceding utterances which is done before responsive word 'Ne'. Also finding the uniformity of speech act chain is accomplished on the center of responsive word 'Ne' and establishing minimal dialogue which is accomplished on the center of it are points. The spoken language corpora of 167,964 words are aimed at and among them total responsive words of 2,104, 'Ne' are subjects. The pragmatic characters of responsive word 'Ne' are divided into two types according to the difference of intonation. Among total responsive words of 2,104, falling intonations are 1,934(96.03%) and raising intonations are 80(3.97%). The basic function of 'Ne' which has falling intonation expresses the mark of affirmative agreement, acceptance, and adaption respectively on the preceding utterances. In addition, 'Ne' which has falling intonation is in charge of response utterances, the function which allows the talking maintenance, the function of topic change, and the function of utterances termination. Also, speaker himself makes clear the boundary about his own utterances or takes charge of function which appears for emphasizing his contents of utterances. The responsive word 'Ne' which has a raising intonation is used as the mark of function about unidentification, fright, and reinquiry. The prospective function in preceding utterances 'Ne' is examined for identifying the aspect of it according to the standard of DAMSL. Among utterances which are related 'Ne' of total responsive words, 2014, 'Ne' which are based on the interaction between speaker and listener are 1,976 except them, 38 examples, which are used as speaker-oriented, and the orders of frequencies in the lists are 'representative(70.44%) > directive (21.58%) > commissive(2.68%) > expressive(2.37%) > declaration(1.77%) > summons(1.16%).' The speech act chain is very universal on the ground of the act of communication and the part in the flows of conversations as essential element. This study established 3 types of speech act chain which is composed on the center of 'Ne' as basic model.

Abstract

A conversation in each utterances is not organized individually but is realized in the relationship of lead-lag utterances. That is, speech act can be response about preceding speech act or preceding utterances which is about a next following speech act. A responsive word 'Ne' which is deal in this study is a response about preceding utterances which is done previously or a stimulation which is about a next following speech act. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to understand the pragmatic characteristics of 'Ne' as response speech on retrospective function for conversation and to type them, and on the ground of it, identify the type of preceding utterances which is done before responsive word 'Ne'. Also finding the uniformity of speech act chain is accomplished on the center of responsive word 'Ne' and establishing minimal dialogue which is accomplished on the center of it are points. The spoken language corpora of 167,964 words are aimed at and among them total responsive words of 2,104, 'Ne' are subjects. The pragmatic characters of responsive word 'Ne' are divided into two types according to the difference of intonation. Among total responsive words of 2,104, falling intonations are 1,934(96.03%) and raising intonations are 80(3.97%). The basic function of 'Ne' which has falling intonation expresses the mark of affirmative agreement, acceptance, and adaption respectively on the preceding utterances. In addition, 'Ne' which has falling intonation is in charge of response utterances, the function which allows the talking maintenance, the function of topic change, and the function of utterances termination. Also, speaker himself makes clear the boundary about his own utterances or takes charge of function which appears for emphasizing his contents of utterances. The responsive word 'Ne' which has a raising intonation is used as the mark of function about unidentification, fright, and reinquiry. The prospective function in preceding utterances 'Ne' is examined for identifying the aspect of it according to the standard of DAMSL. Among utterances which are related 'Ne' of total responsive words, 2014, 'Ne' which are based on the interaction between speaker and listener are 1,976 except them, 38 examples, which are used as speaker-oriented, and the orders of frequencies in the lists are 'representative(70.44%) > directive (21.58%) > commissive(2.68%) > expressive(2.37%) > declaration(1.77%) > summons(1.16%).' The speech act chain is very universal on the ground of the act of communication and the part in the flows of conversations as essential element. This study established 3 types of speech act chain which is composed on the center of 'Ne' as basic model.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 구현정, "대화 텍스트의 구조, 텍스트 분석의 실제" (2003), 역락
  2. 김하수, "언어 행위와 듣는이의 신호에 관한 화용론적 분석 시도", 말, 14, pp.55~70 (1989), 연세대학교 한국어학당
  3. 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1987), 탑출판사
  4. 노대규, "감탄사 ‘네’의 의미와 그 용법, 국어의 이해와 인식" (1991), 한국문화사
  5. 박용익, "대화분석론(개정 증보판), In 대화분석론(개정 증보판)" (2002), 역락
  6. 박혜은, "대화행위의 연쇄관계와 대화 흐름에 대하여 -일정협의 대화를 중심으로", 인지과학, 10(2), pp.27~34 (1999), 한국인지과학회
  7. 서상규, "한국어 구어 연구(1) -구어 전사 말뭉치와 그 활용-" (2002), 한국문화사
  8. 신지연, "국어 간투사의 위상 연구", 석사, pp.1988
  9. 오승신, "국어 간투사 연구", 박사, pp.1995
  10. 이기갑, "한국어 담화 표지 ‘이제’", 담화와 인지, 1, pp.261~287 (1995), 담화인지언어학회
  11. 이원표, "의지 감탄사 “예, 글쎄, 아니”의 담화분석", 사전편찬학, 5(1), pp.164~218 (1995), 연세대학교 언어정보개발원
  12. 이한규, "한국어 담화 표지어 ‘그래’의 의미 연구", 담화와 인지, 3, pp.1~26 (1996), 담화인지언어학회
  13. 이한규, "한국어 담화 표지어 ‘왜’", 담화와 인지, 4(1), pp.1~20 (1997), 담화인지언어학회
  14. 이한규, "한국어 담화 표지어 ‘뭐’의 의미 연구", 담화와 인지, 6(1), pp.137~157 (1999), 담화인지언어학회
  15. 이해영, "담화 표지 ‘글쎄’의 담화 기능과 사용 의미", 이화어문론집, 13, pp.129~150 (1994), 이화어문학회
  16. 임규홍, "담화 표지 ‘뭐냐’와 ‘있지’에 대하여", 어문학, 56, pp.51~68 (1995), 한국어문학회
  17. 임규홍, "국어 담화 표지 ‘인자’에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 2, pp.1~20 (1996), 담화인지언어학회
  18. 최재웅, "대화분석에 있어서의 몇 가지 문제: 호텔 예약 전화대화를 중심으로", 한글 및 한국어 정보처리, 96, pp.7~16 (1996), 한국정보과학회
  19. 최현배, "우리말본" (1991), 탑출판사
  20. 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" (2010)
  21. Beaugrande, R. de, "담화․텍스트 언어학 입문" (1981), 양영각
  22. Jucker, A, "The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical account", Journal of Pragmatics, 24, pp.435~452 (1993)
  23. Levinson, S. C, "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  24. Schegloff E, "Opening up closings", Semiotica, 8, pp.289~327 (1973)
  25. Schiffrin, D, "Discourse marker" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  26. Searle, J. R, "Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language" (1969), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)