응대화행의 간접화행에 관한 연구
A Study on Indirect Speech-acts of Responses
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to identify that there is a indirect speech-act in each responses to stimuli, and to show relevant patterns in which responsive speech-acts appear. This study defines ten basic responsive speech-acts ‘affirming speech-acts, denying speech-acts, rejecting response speech-act, description question response speech-acts, sympathizing speech-acts, non-sympathizing speech- acts, accepting speech-acts, refusing speech-acts, allowing speech-acts, non-allowing speech-acts. Also, just like the responses to request, responsive speech-acts can be divided into a direct speech-act and an indirect speech-act. In a direct speech-act, description question response speech-acts appear the forms of statement, but another speech-acts appear the forms of exclamation. In a indirect speech-act, affirming speech-acts appear the forms of statement, expression, and question. And denying speech-acts appear the forms of statement, expression, question, and order. And rejecting response speech-acts appear the forms of statement and question. And description question response speech-acts appear the forms of question. And sympathizing speech-acts appear the forms of statement and expression. And non-sympathizing speech-acts appear the forms of statement and question. And accepting speech-acts appear the forms of statement, expression, question, and appointment. And refusing speech-acts appear the forms of statement, expression, order, and appointment. And allowing speech-acts appear the forms of statement and expression. And non-allowing speech- acts. appear the forms of statement, expression, order, and proposal.
Abstract
This study aims to identify that there is a indirect speech-act in each responses to stimuli, and to show relevant patterns in which responsive speech-acts appear. This study defines ten basic responsive speech-acts ‘affirming speech-acts, denying speech-acts, rejecting response speech-act, description question response speech-acts, sympathizing speech-acts, non-sympathizing speech- acts, accepting speech-acts, refusing speech-acts, allowing speech-acts, non-allowing speech-acts. Also, just like the responses to request, responsive speech-acts can be divided into a direct speech-act and an indirect speech-act. In a direct speech-act, description question response speech-acts appear the forms of statement, but another speech-acts appear the forms of exclamation. In a indirect speech-act, affirming speech-acts appear the forms of statement, expression, and question. And denying speech-acts appear the forms of statement, expression, question, and order. And rejecting response speech-acts appear the forms of statement and question. And description question response speech-acts appear the forms of question. And sympathizing speech-acts appear the forms of statement and expression. And non-sympathizing speech-acts appear the forms of statement and question. And accepting speech-acts appear the forms of statement, expression, question, and appointment. And refusing speech-acts appear the forms of statement, expression, order, and appointment. And allowing speech-acts appear the forms of statement and expression. And non-allowing speech- acts. appear the forms of statement, expression, order, and proposal.
참고문헌 (12)
- 이은영, "대답의 분류와 특성 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1998
- 이은영, "직접적인 대답과 간접적인 대답의 기능", 한국어학, 20, pp.175~190 (2003), 한국어학회
- 이준희, "국어의 간접 화행에 관한 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1999
- 이필영, "국어의 응답 표현에 대한 연구", 텍스트언어학, 6, pp.71~106 (1999), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 장경희, "진술에 대한 긍정과 부정", 한국어의미학, 5, pp.311~332 (1999), 한국어의미학회
- 장경희, "판정 질문에 대한 긍정과 부정", 한국어의미학, 7, pp.149~174 (2000), 한국어의미학회
- 장경희, "청유 화행에 대한 수락과 거절", 텍스트언어학, 9, pp.111~143 (2002), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 정종수, "정표화행에 관한 연구", 인문과학연구, (36), pp.259~286 (2013), 인문과학연구소
- 정종수, "간접화행 판단의 제문제", 한국언어문화, (28), pp.47~68 (2005), 한국언어문화학회
- 정종수, "한국어 약속화행에 관한 연구", 인문학논총, 33, pp.29~47 (2013), 인문과학연구소
- Searle, J. R., "The Handbook of Pragmatics" (1969), Blackwell Publishing
- Searle, J. R, "A classification of illocutionary acts", Language in Society, 5, pp.1~23 (1976)
