구어 말뭉치에 나타난 비동의 응답화행 연구

Abstract

In this study, the reaction involving the non-cooperative attitude toward the previous utterance is defined as the 'disagreement response speech act' and its scope is first specified. This study used the 62,880 eojeol 21st century Sejong corpus in order to classify the aspects of realization of the response speech acts of disagreement. There were a total of 1,381 instances of the disagreement response speech act in the corpus. A total of 948 utterances occurred in the everyday conversation texts, and the total of 433 utterances in the discussion texts. In the everyday conversation, the strong disagreement 63.50% is followed by the weakened disagreement 20.25%, and the passive disagreement 16.25%, while in the discussion texts, the strong disagreement 65.13% is followed by the passive disagreement 23.56 % and the weakened disagreement 11.31%. The examining the spoken corpus shows that the strong disagreement response speech acts are most frequently used both in the everyday conversation and discussion texts. In the case of the discussion texts, the high frequency of the disagreement speech acts, specially the strong disagreement responses can be attributed to the nature of the texts that the discussion operation on the principle of competition. However, what is of note is that the high frequency of the strong disagreement types in the everyday conversation texts even though the overall frequency of disagreement speech acts is relatively low. This may result from one of the characteristics of the corpus, that is, the participants of the everyday conversation in the corpus are mainly in their 20s and 30s, who know each other well. As they are personally close, there is not much power difference between them, and the necessity of saving each other's face in the situation of light conversation is low. As a result, the frequency of realization of disagreement speech acts is low and the consideration of politeness is also less prominent. This highlights the need to take these factors into account when constructing a corpus as they affect the selection of types of disagreement speech acts.