러시아 체제전환 시기 사회통합정책 분석연구 : 시베리아 소수민족 관련정책을 중심으로
An Analytic Study on the Social Integration Policy in the Period of Russian System Transition : Focusing on the Siberian Minority-Related Policy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Russian government has stated they implemented a reasonable social integration policy, which suited the new era, for the people in the period of its system transition. However, the integration of classes, races and generations has been incomplete and insufficient is a view shared by experts. Even up until now, the conflict between Slavic people and non-Slavic people in Russia still exists under the water like glaciers with no effective settlement. What was the cause for that? Was it caused by wrong implementation of the policy? Or did it go bad in the process of applying the policy? This study is focused on analyzing the perspective of the Russian government towards others to devise the policy targeting non-Slavic people and implement it. This study compared differences between the two to look into the identity of the Russian social integration policy and its perception on others. The Siberian minority-related policy of the Russian government during the period of system transition had differences between the contents to push ahead with and the identity when the policy was implemented, It was a positive multi-cultural policy. But when it comes to the application, it was an assimilation-based passive policy for discrimination exclusion. The difference between the contents of the policy and the identity when it was applied means that the will to enforce the policy was different when it was pushed ahead with and when it was applied. In other words, it was not the change for efficient implementation of the policy. The current ethnic disharmony deepening in Russia is the outcome of the improper policy application during system transition of the past. If the previous policy and policy application are repeated now and forever without solving this fundamental cause, the future of Russia would not differ from the present.
Abstract
The Russian government has stated they implemented a reasonable social integration policy, which suited the new era, for the people in the period of its system transition. However, the integration of classes, races and generations has been incomplete and insufficient is a view shared by experts. Even up until now, the conflict between Slavic people and non-Slavic people in Russia still exists under the water like glaciers with no effective settlement. What was the cause for that? Was it caused by wrong implementation of the policy? Or did it go bad in the process of applying the policy? This study is focused on analyzing the perspective of the Russian government towards others to devise the policy targeting non-Slavic people and implement it. This study compared differences between the two to look into the identity of the Russian social integration policy and its perception on others. The Siberian minority-related policy of the Russian government during the period of system transition had differences between the contents to push ahead with and the identity when the policy was implemented, It was a positive multi-cultural policy. But when it comes to the application, it was an assimilation-based passive policy for discrimination exclusion. The difference between the contents of the policy and the identity when it was applied means that the will to enforce the policy was different when it was pushed ahead with and when it was applied. In other words, it was not the change for efficient implementation of the policy. The current ethnic disharmony deepening in Russia is the outcome of the improper policy application during system transition of the past. If the previous policy and policy application are repeated now and forever without solving this fundamental cause, the future of Russia would not differ from the present.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김태진, "러시아 시베리아지역 소멸위기 언어에 대한 고찰- 네네츠어를 중심으로 -", 한국 시베리아연구, 17(2), pp.161~188 (2013), 한국-시베리아센터
- 김혜진, "러시아의 소수민족 정책과 한계", 국제지역연구, 16(1), pp.51~76 (2012), 국제지역연구센터[DOI]
- 남혜현, "탈소비에트 시기 러시아 정부의 러시아어 확산 정책", 슬라브硏究, 27(2), pp.161~194 (2011), 러시아연구소[DOI]
- 배규성, "러시아 북방 토착 소수 민족의 법적 권리: 법적 규범과 현실", 한국 시베리아연구, 24(1), pp.105~142 (2020), 한국-시베리아센터[DOI]
- 유승만, "소비에트 언어정책의 이론과 실제", 러시아연구, 18(2), pp.141~165 (2008), 러시아연구소[DOI]
- Адамчук В.В, "Экономика иСоциолигия Труда" (1999), ЮНИТИ
- Виханский О.С., "Страгическое управление" (2004), Юрист
- Богоявленский Д.Д., "Вымирают ли народы севера?", Социологическиеисследования, 8, pp.51~61 (2005)
- Богданова Т.И., "Авторефератдиссертации к.э.н. МГУ Сервиса" (2006)
- Глазьев С.Ю, "Почему мы самые богатые а живем так бедно" (2003), ТЕРРА
- Демонтьева Н.Ф., "Организационно-методические асекты деятельности социального работникаСоциальная работы в учрежденях здравохранея" (1998)
- Мудрник А.В., "Введение в социальную педагогику" (1998)
- Новикова Н.И., "Право нефти и права аборигенов", Этнографическоеобозрение, 3, pp.28~36 (2008)
- Соколовский С.В., "Коренные народы: от политики стратегическогоэссенциализма к принципу социальной справедливости", Этнографическое обозрение, 4, pp.59~76 (2008)
- Трофимов Е., "Основные направления формированиязаконодательнойбазы национальной политики", Власть, 5, pp.1~31 (2007)
- Castels S., "The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World" (2003), Guilford Press
- Wilson E., "Extractive Industries and Indigenous Peoples in Russia: Regulation, Participation and the Role of Anthropologists", International Institute for Environment and Development, pp.1~15 (2009)
- Fondahl G., "Rights and Risks: Evenki Concerns Regarding the Proposed Eastern Siberia-Pacific Ocean Pipeline", Interdisciplinary Journal of Siberian Studies, 5(2), pp.115~138 (2006)
- Luft S., "Einführung in die Themtik des Bandes", pp.9~47 (2010), Transcript
- Nohlen D., "Kleines Lexikon der Politik", pp.207~208 (2001), BzfpB