러시아의 민족 언어 지원 정책 분석 연구: 소련의 민족 언어 평등 정책과의 비교를 중심으로
Analysis Research of Russia’s ‘Support Policy for Ethnic Language’: Focused on Comparison with Soviet Union’s ‘Equality Policy on Ethnic Language’
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Through globalization, the whole world is folding into a multicultural era. This era has escaped the current country’s and nation’s frame, and while experiencing a new form of social and cultural disputes, it has faced realistic problems such as racial conflicts, alienation, and discrimination. Especially in multi-ethnic countries, the conflicts within the nation are deepening and becoming more complex than in the past. Therefore, the national policy enforcement within the multi-ethnic country is becoming the core key word for the unity, maintenance, and improvement of the country. A Correct and efficient national policy enforcement could be the cornerstone of the multi-ethnic country; however, the regressive national policy could also threaten or dismantle the country, becoming its key of existence or destruction. And the ethnic-language policy plays a core role in that national policy. Ethnical identity can be defined as one’s individual’s feeling of belonging to a specific nation due to the shared national characteristic. The ethnic Language is the essential tool to maintain and achieve the national characteristic. The ethnic language is the nation’s representative symbol, and through the language, the national culture and identity are inherited. Therefore, the next generation’s ethnic language’s communication ability will become the benchmark for judging the national identity’s continuation. The sum of all formal management and administrative measures relating to the ethnic language is called ethnic language policy. The analysis research of the ethnic language policy is an indicator understanding the national policy’s identity aimed by the nation. As a scale that predicts the direction of the continuation of the national policy, the analysis research is massive in its value. This analysis research of the Russian ethnic language policy puts the analysis of the Russian government’s support policy for non-Slavic ethnic groups in Russia as its core. However, this analysis does not only review the efficiency of the Russian government’s ethnic language policy. Through the transition point in time of when Russia has truly entered the multi-cultural society, we will examine the identity and the direction of the Russian ethnic language policy. According to the policy’s identity and direction, the future of the Russian multi-cultural society’s future may change. This research is an analysis research using the collected documentary records to find differences between the Russian ethnic language support policy and the Soviet Union’s ethnic language equality policy. Firstly, through the analytic background from the times of the Soviet Union to modern Russia, the basic operation is grasping the diachronic approach method of the contents of the ethnic language policy. Through these kinds of processes, the analysis of the causes and basic characteristics of the Soviet Union’s and Russian ethnic language policy towards non-Slavic ethnic group took place. Later, using both the Soviet’s ethnic language equality policy and the research frame called the comparative analysis, the identity, limitations, and the objectives of selected analysis target, the ethnic language support policy (Core analysis policy: multi-lingual permit policy and the native language education support policy) was sought out. The policy comparison isn’t the differences between the advantages or the disadvantages. Using the analysis of the similarities and the differences, instead of the efficiency of the policy, the analysis revealing the character of the policy is considered as the core of the policy comparison.
Abstract
Through globalization, the whole world is folding into a multicultural era. This era has escaped the current country’s and nation’s frame, and while experiencing a new form of social and cultural disputes, it has faced realistic problems such as racial conflicts, alienation, and discrimination. Especially in multi-ethnic countries, the conflicts within the nation are deepening and becoming more complex than in the past. Therefore, the national policy enforcement within the multi-ethnic country is becoming the core key word for the unity, maintenance, and improvement of the country. A Correct and efficient national policy enforcement could be the cornerstone of the multi-ethnic country; however, the regressive national policy could also threaten or dismantle the country, becoming its key of existence or destruction. And the ethnic-language policy plays a core role in that national policy. Ethnical identity can be defined as one’s individual’s feeling of belonging to a specific nation due to the shared national characteristic. The ethnic Language is the essential tool to maintain and achieve the national characteristic. The ethnic language is the nation’s representative symbol, and through the language, the national culture and identity are inherited. Therefore, the next generation’s ethnic language’s communication ability will become the benchmark for judging the national identity’s continuation. The sum of all formal management and administrative measures relating to the ethnic language is called ethnic language policy. The analysis research of the ethnic language policy is an indicator understanding the national policy’s identity aimed by the nation. As a scale that predicts the direction of the continuation of the national policy, the analysis research is massive in its value. This analysis research of the Russian ethnic language policy puts the analysis of the Russian government’s support policy for non-Slavic ethnic groups in Russia as its core. However, this analysis does not only review the efficiency of the Russian government’s ethnic language policy. Through the transition point in time of when Russia has truly entered the multi-cultural society, we will examine the identity and the direction of the Russian ethnic language policy. According to the policy’s identity and direction, the future of the Russian multi-cultural society’s future may change. This research is an analysis research using the collected documentary records to find differences between the Russian ethnic language support policy and the Soviet Union’s ethnic language equality policy. Firstly, through the analytic background from the times of the Soviet Union to modern Russia, the basic operation is grasping the diachronic approach method of the contents of the ethnic language policy. Through these kinds of processes, the analysis of the causes and basic characteristics of the Soviet Union’s and Russian ethnic language policy towards non-Slavic ethnic group took place. Later, using both the Soviet’s ethnic language equality policy and the research frame called the comparative analysis, the identity, limitations, and the objectives of selected analysis target, the ethnic language support policy (Core analysis policy: multi-lingual permit policy and the native language education support policy) was sought out. The policy comparison isn’t the differences between the advantages or the disadvantages. Using the analysis of the similarities and the differences, instead of the efficiency of the policy, the analysis revealing the character of the policy is considered as the core of the policy comparison.
참고문헌 (25)
- 구현우, "역사적 제도주의와 비교정책연구 - 제도의 지속성, 변화가능성, 그리고 정책패턴을 중심으로 -", 한국정책학회보, 18(2), pp.37~72 (2009), 한국정책학회
- 김인성, "러시아연방의 다문화주의", 민족연구, 30, pp.24~42 (2007)
- 김영술, "러시안 디아스포라에 관한 연구 : 차별과 귀환이주를 중심으로", 박사, 세계한민족네트워크, pp.2008
- 남혜현, "탈소비에트 시기 러시아 정부의 러시아어 확산 정책", 슬라브硏究, 27(2), pp.161~194 (2011), 러시아연구소
- 서규환, "사회주의와 민족문제- 소련의 민족정책을 중심으로 -", 슬라브硏究, 23(1), pp.1~30 (2007), 러시아연구소
- 성종환, "러시아 지역정체성 연구방법- 소수민족 언어정책을 중심으로 -", 슬라브硏究, 19(1), pp.23~46 (2003), 러시아연구소
- 유승만, "소비에트 언어정책의 이론과 실제", 러시아연구, 18(2), pp.141~165 (2008), 러시아연구소
- 윤인진, "중앙아시아 한인의 언어와 민족정체성", 재외한인연구, 7, pp.127~136 (1998)
- 윤인진, "재외한인 연구의 동향과 과제" (2011), 북코리아
- 조규범, "다문화사회를 위한 입법적 대응방향" (2011), 푸른길
- 전병국, "고려인 강제 이주 원인과 민족 정체성", 러시아어문학연구논집, (35), pp.201~221 (2010), 한국러시아문학회
- 정경택, "소수민족에 대한 소련의 언어정책", 슬라브硏究, 28(4), pp.31~51 (2012), 러시아연구소
- 다민족·다문화사회로의 이행을 위한 정책패러다임구축, "정의철", 한국여성정책연구원, ~ (2011)
- 재외동포재단, "재외동포는 국력의 외연: 모국과 거주국을 잇는가교", 재외동포문제 대토론회 자료집, 15~16 (2014)
- 최대희, "소비에트 민족 정책과 스탈린의 민족 문제 해결", 인문과학, 16, pp.121~142 (2003)
- 허영식, "프랑스와 독일의 사회통합정책 비교분석", 한독사회과학논총, 22(1), pp.71~98 (2012), 한독사회과학회
- 홍문종, "한국다문화사회의 쟁점과 진단" (2010), 역락
- Арефьев А.Л., "Сколько людей говорят и будут говорить по-русски", Демоскоп Weekly, 251~252 (2006)
- "КРИЗИС ЯЗЫКА И ПРОБЛЕМЫЭТНИЧЕСКОГО РАЗВИТИЯ НАРОДОВ РОССИИ" (2003)[URL]
- Данило ж., "Маркович “Общая Социология”", pp.432~ (1998), Гуманит. изд. центрВЛАДОС
- Ленин В.И., "“Нужен ли обязательный государственный язык” Полноесобрание сочинений том 24. 293-295", Законопроект онациональном равноправии vol.25, 16~18
- Халеева И.И., "Лингвистическая безопасность России", ВестникРоссийской Академии Наук, 76(2) (2006)
- Shibutani, "Ethnic Stratification. A Comparative Approach" (1965), The Mac Millan Company
- Hays, Pamela A., "문화적 다양성과 소통하기 : 다문화상담의 이해" (2010), 한울
- Laruelle, Marlene, "Central Asian Labor Migrants in Russia: The ”Diasporization“ of Central Asian States?", China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 5(3), pp.101~119 (2007)
