탈 소비에트 과정에서 진행된 러시아 이주노동자정책 연구
Research of the Russian Migrant Worker Policy in Post-Soviet Process
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to analyze the migrants who returned to Russia from the CIS during the time of the Soviet Union, and it especially aims to analyze the migrants' survival and the labor policies directly related to them. However, this analysis is not a utility analysis that analyzes the economic value and the economic advantages and disadvantages of the policy. Russia is no entering into a new multicultural era whether they want it or not. This study aims to examine the fundamental identity (正體性) and direction (方向性) of the migrant labor policy Russia had during the Soviet Union times during this flow in the eras. If so, what is the identity of the migrant worker policy of Russia? By looking through the time and the environment it was created, the Russian migrant policy can be a good medium for understanding the Russian race, human rights, and other people's views, rather than just one economic and social policy. Therefore, this study strived to use the analysis of the characteristics of the policy as the basic propel strategy. Representative migrant workers' policies during the Soviet period include residence registration system, work permit system and quota system for migrant workers. The three representative policies of migrant workers were selected as the basic analysis policy of this study, and the characteristics and direction of the whole policy were analyzed by analyzing the similarities and differences of each policy. Also, even though on the surface these policies were carried out by using the same consumers (Migrant workers who returned from CIS) as the subject, practically, the subjects were racially divided into Slavic and non-Slavic. Thus, this study viewed in the perspective of looking at how each policy was applied to both the Slavic and the non-Slavic. Regardless of the conditions, environments, and the racial divisions of the policy consumers, there was an undeniable common point that from the past to the present, 'migrant workers' were always the weak and were always the stranger. During the processes of drafting and carrying out each policy, depending on the political and economic environments, the policies were applied either with benefits or disadvantages to the migrant workers. In addition, the policy was implemented differently according to the Slavic and to the non-Slavic. However, it was just an advantage and disadvantage in the presence of discrimination; it was not a change in the fundamental view of the other. Therefore, when analyzing the Russian migrant workers' policy in the Soviet era, we can observe the tendency toward the weak and the strangers in Russia and clearly understand the hidden intentions. By understanding identity and direction, we can understand the current Russian multicultural policies and further predict the future Russian multicultural policy.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the migrants who returned to Russia from the CIS during the time of the Soviet Union, and it especially aims to analyze the migrants' survival and the labor policies directly related to them. However, this analysis is not a utility analysis that analyzes the economic value and the economic advantages and disadvantages of the policy. Russia is no entering into a new multicultural era whether they want it or not. This study aims to examine the fundamental identity (正體性) and direction (方向性) of the migrant labor policy Russia had during the Soviet Union times during this flow in the eras. If so, what is the identity of the migrant worker policy of Russia? By looking through the time and the environment it was created, the Russian migrant policy can be a good medium for understanding the Russian race, human rights, and other people's views, rather than just one economic and social policy. Therefore, this study strived to use the analysis of the characteristics of the policy as the basic propel strategy. Representative migrant workers' policies during the Soviet period include residence registration system, work permit system and quota system for migrant workers. The three representative policies of migrant workers were selected as the basic analysis policy of this study, and the characteristics and direction of the whole policy were analyzed by analyzing the similarities and differences of each policy. Also, even though on the surface these policies were carried out by using the same consumers (Migrant workers who returned from CIS) as the subject, practically, the subjects were racially divided into Slavic and non-Slavic. Thus, this study viewed in the perspective of looking at how each policy was applied to both the Slavic and the non-Slavic. Regardless of the conditions, environments, and the racial divisions of the policy consumers, there was an undeniable common point that from the past to the present, 'migrant workers' were always the weak and were always the stranger. During the processes of drafting and carrying out each policy, depending on the political and economic environments, the policies were applied either with benefits or disadvantages to the migrant workers. In addition, the policy was implemented differently according to the Slavic and to the non-Slavic. However, it was just an advantage and disadvantage in the presence of discrimination; it was not a change in the fundamental view of the other. Therefore, when analyzing the Russian migrant workers' policy in the Soviet era, we can observe the tendency toward the weak and the strangers in Russia and clearly understand the hidden intentions. By understanding identity and direction, we can understand the current Russian multicultural policies and further predict the future Russian multicultural policy.
참고문헌 (21)
- 고숙희, "한국정부의 다문화사회 대응정책: 외국인 거주유형별 정책차이를 중심으로", 한국사회와 행정연구, 19(3), pp.149~171 (2008), 서울행정학회
- 김성진, "러시아 이주정책의 성격과 발전 전망", 한국정치학회보, 42(4), pp.523~544 (2008), 한국정치학회[DOI]
- 김인성, "러시아에서의 민족주의와 다문화주의", 민족연구, (50), pp.23~49 (2012), 사단법인 한국민족연구원[DOI]
- 박진경, "다문화주의와 사회통합 - 캐나다와 호주를 중심으로 -", 한국정책학회보, 21(2), pp.123~152 (2012), 한국정책학회[DOI]
- 변현섭, "러시아 내 이주노동자 문제와 정책적 과제: CIS 국가 간의 노동이주를 중심으로", 아태연구, 22(1), pp.5~40 (2015), 국제지역연구원[DOI]
- 이로미, "다문화국가 이민자 정착 정책 및 지원 서비스 분석: 미국과 캐나다 사례를 중심으로", 국제지역연구, 14(1), pp.179~208 (2010), 국제지역연구센터
- 이채문, "외국인 이주노동자에 대한 러시아의 이민정책", 대한정치학회보, 18(3), pp.79~110 (2011), 대한정치학회
- 전병국, "디아스포라와 국가정책 - 러시안 디아스포라와 차이니즈 디아스포라를 중심으로", 비교문화연구, 26, pp.123~144 (2012), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 전병국, "러시아의 민족 언어 지원 정책 분석 연구: 소련의 민족 언어 평등 정책과의 비교를 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (53), pp.195~223 (2016), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 최무현, "다문화시대의 소수자정책 수단에 관한 연구: 참여정부의 ‘다문화정책’을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 42(3), pp.51~77 (2008), 한국행정학회
- Виханский О.С., "Страгическое управление", pp.11~232 (2004), юрист
- Дмитриев А.В., "Конфеликтология", pp.7~79 (2006), ГАРДАРИКА
- Здравмыслов А.Г., "Социология Конфликта", pp.5~155 (1994), Аспект Пресс
- Синягов А.А., "Социально-Экономические Проблемы", pp.8~264 (2002), Экономико
- British Embassy, "Russia Visa Application Form Moscow" (2010), American Press
- Castels, "The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modem Work,3" (2003), Guilford Press
- Human Rights Watch, "Are You Happy to Cheat Us?: Exploitation of Migrant Construction Workers in Russia" (2009), GM Press
- Preventing forced labour exploitation and promoting good labour practices in the Russian construction industry, "International Labour Organization", 18~ (2009)
- Lasswel Harold D, "A Pre-View of Policy Sciences" (1971), American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc
- Schenk, Caress, "Open Borders, Closed Minds: Russia’s Changing Migration Policies" (2010)
- Zhukava Nadzeya, "Florence School on Euro-Mediterranean Migration and Development Second Session", pp.8~25 (2006), юрист
