러시아 사회통합정책의 민낯, 목표와 적용의 괴리 : 사회복지 관련 근로자에 대한 러시아 정부의 시야를 중심으로
Principles, Applications, and Realities of Social Integration Policies in Russia : Focusing on the Stance of Russian Government towards Social Welfare-related Workers
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study started from the question ‘Could Russian government keep the fundamental purpose that the social welfare policy should have at least in the age of transformation that was regarded as one of the worst economic situations in Russia?’. This study also focused on the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers among diverse crossroads. The situations of the times required a more firm social welfare system and more professionalized social welfare workers. At that time, social welfare-related workers were warriors to fight in the front lie of Russian social welfare field. The purpose of this study is to analyze the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transportation and classification of related policies and fundamentally understand Russian government’s real intention towards the weak. During the regime transition, Russian government cut down on finances of social welfare system and even reduced or privatized social welfare facilities that protected the social weak, under the pretext of efficient distribution of national finances. Undoubtedly, the pain of the social weak was aggravated in this process. What was the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers, who played a role as the last rescue line for the social weak, this time? This study demonstrates that Russian government was indifferent to, or intentionally neglected social welfare workers. This indifference or intentional negligence of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers led to a low-quality social welfare service and ultimately played a decisive role in increasing the difficulty of the social weak. According to the Titmuss social welfare model theory, the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transformation can be classified into a residual type. Considering the tough situation that the social weak faced at that time, also, it is hard to say that this stance of Russian government was a good choice, from the perspective of social welfare.
Abstract
This study started from the question ‘Could Russian government keep the fundamental purpose that the social welfare policy should have at least in the age of transformation that was regarded as one of the worst economic situations in Russia?’. This study also focused on the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers among diverse crossroads. The situations of the times required a more firm social welfare system and more professionalized social welfare workers. At that time, social welfare-related workers were warriors to fight in the front lie of Russian social welfare field. The purpose of this study is to analyze the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transportation and classification of related policies and fundamentally understand Russian government’s real intention towards the weak. During the regime transition, Russian government cut down on finances of social welfare system and even reduced or privatized social welfare facilities that protected the social weak, under the pretext of efficient distribution of national finances. Undoubtedly, the pain of the social weak was aggravated in this process. What was the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers, who played a role as the last rescue line for the social weak, this time? This study demonstrates that Russian government was indifferent to, or intentionally neglected social welfare workers. This indifference or intentional negligence of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers led to a low-quality social welfare service and ultimately played a decisive role in increasing the difficulty of the social weak. According to the Titmuss social welfare model theory, the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transformation can be classified into a residual type. Considering the tough situation that the social weak faced at that time, also, it is hard to say that this stance of Russian government was a good choice, from the perspective of social welfare.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김상균, "사회복지개론", pp.1~560 (2015), 나남
- 이형열, "장애유형별 취업 근로자의 개인적특성, 직업훈련, 직업만족이 직업유지기간에 미치는 영향-뇌병변, 시각, 신장, 청각장애 근로자를 중심으로-", 사회복지정책, (32), pp.109~134 (2008), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
- 안병영, "소련사회복지정책의 전개", 중소연구, 17, pp.14~43 (1983)
- 양정훈, "러시아 장애인 복지정책의 발달과정에 대한 소고(溯考)", 슬라브硏究, 23(2), pp.23~49 (2007), 러시아연구소[DOI]
- 옥수선, "돌봄서비스 종사자의 직무경험에 관한 인식유형 연구", 사회과학연구, 32(2), pp.243~269 (2016), 사회과학연구소[DOI]
- 전병국, "러시아의 민족 언어 지원 정책 분석 연구: 소련의 민족 언어 평등 정책과의 비교를 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (53), pp.195~223 (2016), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 정재원, "러시아 사회복지정책의 변화: 세계자본주의체제와 국가 신자유주의의 영향", 중소연구, 38(2), pp.201~241 (2014), 아태지역연구센터[DOI]
- Адамчук В. В, "Экономика исоциолигия труда", pp.1~214 (1999), Юнити
- Виханский О. С., "Страгическое управление", pp.1~175 (2004), юрист
- Глазьев С. Ю., "Почему мы самые богатые а живем так бедн", pp.1~665 (2003), Тeppa
- Alexandrova A., "Reform of In-Kind Benefits in Russia:High Cost for Small Gain", Journal of European Social Policy, 17(2), pp.153~166 (2007)
- Social Work Education and the Practice Environment in Europe and Eurasia, "Davis R.", United States Agency for International Development, 1~57 (2008)
- Davidova N., "Poverty and Social Exclusion in the New Russia", pp.174~196 (2004), Ashgate
- Foley M. C., "Poverty in Russia:Public Policy and Private Responses", pp.189~210 (1997), World Bank
- The Development of a System of Social Services in the Russian Federation, "Gilbert K.", Management Research Centre. Wolverhampton Business School, 5~19, pp.Working Paper 014 (1999), 99
- Iarskaia-Smirnova E., "Professionalization of Social Work in Russia, 1990s", Paper for the ESA Congress, pp.311~327 (2001)
- Iarskaia-Smirnova E., "Professional Development of Social Work in Russia", Social Work and Society:International Online Journal, 2(1), pp.88~101 (2004)
- Iarskaia-Smirnova E., "Social Care under State Socialism (1945-1989)", pp.140~158 (2009), Barbara Budrich Publishers
- Jaeger M. M., "Does Left-right Orientation Have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution? Causal Analysis with Cross-sectional Data Using Instrumental Variables", International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), pp.363~374 (2008)
- Lasswel Harold D. A., "Pre-View of Policy Sciences" (1971), American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc
- Mahon R., "Introduction to Child Care at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring", pp.325~355 (2002), Routledge
- Teplova T., "Welfare State Transformation, Childcare, and Women's Work in Russia", Social Politics, 14(3), pp.284~322 (2007)
- Titmuss R. M., "Social Policy : An Introduction" (1974), George Allen & Unwin Ltd
- Titterton M., "Social Policy in a Cold Climate: Health and Social Welfare in Russia", Social Policy and Administration, 40(1), pp.88~103 (2006)
- Williams C., "The Re-theorising of Welfare since 1991 and its Impact on Social Welfare Provision in Russia", Paper Presented to International Sociological Association Committee on Poverty. Social Welfare and Social Policy Conference on “Re-theorizing Welfare States: Restructuring States, Restructuring Analysis, pp.1~21 (2005)
- Russian Economic Report, "World Bank", World Bank, ~ (2008)
- "러시아사회교육자ㆍ사회복지사조합" (2020)[URL]