러시아 형식주의: 혁명적 문학이론의 기원
Russian Formalism: the Origin of Revolutionary Literary Theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Тhe purpose of this paper is to reexamine the legacy of Russian formalism not only as one of the most groundbreaking theoretical systems from the last century but also in terms of a characteristic original point for revolutionary literary theory itself. While retrospectively looking back at its short but intense trajectory of development with the background of Bolshevik Revolution in Russia 100 years ago, we intend to underscore the multifaceted ways that representative theorists of formalism had disappeared from the historical stage of revolution, that is, ending scenery(/scenario) of formalism, alongside with the well-known high-profile appearance of Russian formalism. From the perspective of today, what is more interesting than the actual historical path of formalism is the alternative route that it could have gone, but had not stepped on, so-called “unexplored possibilities” of formalism. Origin is a point of ‘exceptional openness’ in which pluralities of potentialities to be manifested later are ejected at once. Russian formalism is offered to us today as that kind of origin for revolutionary literary theory, namely the first place where ‘fundamental questions’ about literature have been raised for the first time. Just like the Russian Revolution did when it happened exactly 100 years ago.
Abstract
Тhe purpose of this paper is to reexamine the legacy of Russian formalism not only as one of the most groundbreaking theoretical systems from the last century but also in terms of a characteristic original point for revolutionary literary theory itself. While retrospectively looking back at its short but intense trajectory of development with the background of Bolshevik Revolution in Russia 100 years ago, we intend to underscore the multifaceted ways that representative theorists of formalism had disappeared from the historical stage of revolution, that is, ending scenery(/scenario) of formalism, alongside with the well-known high-profile appearance of Russian formalism. From the perspective of today, what is more interesting than the actual historical path of formalism is the alternative route that it could have gone, but had not stepped on, so-called “unexplored possibilities” of formalism. Origin is a point of ‘exceptional openness’ in which pluralities of potentialities to be manifested later are ejected at once. Russian formalism is offered to us today as that kind of origin for revolutionary literary theory, namely the first place where ‘fundamental questions’ about literature have been raised for the first time. Just like the Russian Revolution did when it happened exactly 100 years ago.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김수환, "아방가르드의 기원적 풍경: 러시아 미래주의 선언문 읽기", 인문예술잡지F, (2), pp.55~72 (2012), 이음
- 김수환, "러시아적 일상과 두 이론: 형식주의 vs 바흐친", 슬라브硏究, 32(1), pp.85~113 (2016), 러시아연구소
- 마야코프스키 블라디미르, "대중의 취향에 따귀를 때려라" (2005), 책세상
- 브룩스 클리언스, "잘 빚어진 항아리" (1997), 문예출판사
- Депретто К., "Формализм в России" (2015)
- Левченко Я., "Другая наука: Русские формалисты в поисках биографии" (2012)
- Медведев П., "Формальныйметод в литературоведении (критическоеввдение в социологическую поэтику) Тетралогия" (1998)
- Тиханов Г., "Заметки о диспуте формалистов и марксистов 1927 года", Новое Литературное Обозрение, (50), pp.279~286 (2001)
- Троцкий Л. Д., "Литература и революция" (1991)
- Тынянов Ю. Н., "Поэтика, история литературы, кино" (1997)
- Цивьян Ю., "Жест революции, или Шкловский как путаник", НовоеЛитературное Обозрение, (92), pp.10~23 (2008)
- Шкловский В., "О теории прозы" (1983)
- Шкловский В., "Памятник научной ошибке", Литературная газета. Jan. 27 1930, ~ (1930)
- Эйхенбаум Б., "О литературе" (1987)
- Эрлих В., "Русскийформализм: история и теория" (1996), СПб
- Boym S., "Another Freedom: The Alternative History of an Idea" (2010), The University of Chicago Press
- Boym S., "Poetics and Politics of Estrangement: Victor Shklovsky and Hannah Arendt", Poetics Today, 26(4), pp.581~611 (2005)
- Brooks C., "The Well Wrought Urn" (1949)
- Buck-Morss S., "Dreamworld and Catastrophe: The Passing of Mass Utopia in East and West" (2000), MIT Press
- Buchloh Benjamin H. D., "From Faktura to Factography", October, 30, pp.82~119 (1984), The MIT Press
- Caryl E., "A History of Russian Literary Theory and Criticism: The Soviet Age and Beyond", pp.64~89 (2011), University of Pittsburgh Press
- Eagleton T., "Literary Theory: An Introduction" (1996), The University of Minnesota Press
- Fore D., "The Encyclopedia of the Novel", pp.315~320 (2011), Blackwell Publishing
- Hansen-Löve A., "《Бытология》между фактами и функциями", Revue des étues slaves, 57, pp.91~103 (1985)
- Hayles N. K., "How We Read: Close, Hyper, Machine", ADE Bulletin, (150), pp.62~79 (2010)
- Moretti F., "The Slaughterhouse of Literature", MLQ, 61(1), pp.207~227 (2000)
- Moretti F., "Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History" (2005), Verso
- Morson G. S., "Russian formalist criticism: four essays" (2012), The University of Nebraska Press
- Serlen R., "The Distant Future? Reading Franco Moretti", Literature Compass, pp.214~224 (2010)
- Sheldon R., "Victor Shklovsky and the Device of Ostensible Surrender", Slavic Review, 34(1), pp.86~108