러시아 ‘네오리얼리즘’ 연구: 시학의 태동과 형성을 중심으로
A Study of the Russian Neorealism: the Emergence and Formation of Poetics
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Russian literature experienced the transition from Romanticism to Realism in the 19th century, where after Symbolism rooted in Romanticism formed the general trend of Russian literature at the beginning of the 20th century. By the time Symbolism was in a state of decline, the two independent but reciprocal literary arts systems, i.e. poetry and prose, emerged simultaneously and a new type of prose, wherein both Symbolism and Realism were uniquely amalgamated, began its existence. The prose of 1920s, completed by the combination of poetic metaphysics of Symbolism and a point of view analyzing the daily routines of traditional Realism, brought up the renovation in the layer of formality as well as epistemology. However, the prose of this time is either understood in the extensive paradigm of the literary history of 'Modernism' or regarded as a sporadic phenomenon in reaction to the poetry of the Silver Age before Socialists' Realism was completely established. For this reason, there arises a necessity to study the prose of the early 20th century from a poetic perspective of 'Neorealism', which is considered a more concrete framework for interpretation. To perform an overall and comprehensive study on Russian Neorealism, one needs in fact to be in pursuit of a new possibility for the topography of 20th century Russian literature; at least, by chasing the origin of Russian Neorealism, by contemplating a matter of 'existence' as a perception factor of Neorealist poetics, and by illuminating the poetry of the 20th century as an apparition of Neorealist poetics. This paper, as a preliminary step, mainly investigates the emergence and formation of Neorealism, which is regarded as a new framework for interpretation of the Russian prose of the 20th century. The realization of Neorealist poetics and the aesthetic horizon of Neorealism reflected in the literature of Post-Modernism and Post-Realism are the major topics of further study.
Abstract
Russian literature experienced the transition from Romanticism to Realism in the 19th century, where after Symbolism rooted in Romanticism formed the general trend of Russian literature at the beginning of the 20th century. By the time Symbolism was in a state of decline, the two independent but reciprocal literary arts systems, i.e. poetry and prose, emerged simultaneously and a new type of prose, wherein both Symbolism and Realism were uniquely amalgamated, began its existence. The prose of 1920s, completed by the combination of poetic metaphysics of Symbolism and a point of view analyzing the daily routines of traditional Realism, brought up the renovation in the layer of formality as well as epistemology. However, the prose of this time is either understood in the extensive paradigm of the literary history of 'Modernism' or regarded as a sporadic phenomenon in reaction to the poetry of the Silver Age before Socialists' Realism was completely established. For this reason, there arises a necessity to study the prose of the early 20th century from a poetic perspective of 'Neorealism', which is considered a more concrete framework for interpretation. To perform an overall and comprehensive study on Russian Neorealism, one needs in fact to be in pursuit of a new possibility for the topography of 20th century Russian literature; at least, by chasing the origin of Russian Neorealism, by contemplating a matter of 'existence' as a perception factor of Neorealist poetics, and by illuminating the poetry of the 20th century as an apparition of Neorealist poetics. This paper, as a preliminary step, mainly investigates the emergence and formation of Neorealism, which is regarded as a new framework for interpretation of the Russian prose of the 20th century. The realization of Neorealist poetics and the aesthetic horizon of Neorealism reflected in the literature of Post-Modernism and Post-Realism are the major topics of further study.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김세일, "러시아 네오리얼리즘 산문에 반영된 은세기 문학유산", 외국학연구, 21(21), pp.167~194 (2012), 외국학연구소
- 김홍중, "자먀찐의 「예술 산문 기술 강의」: 연상의 시학과 세계 인식", 러시아연구, 23(1), pp.25~50 (2013), 러시아연구소
- 송정수, "러시아 아방가르드 예술 속의 실재: 현실의 인식과 재구성 논리에 관하여", 외국학연구, 14(2), pp.397~420 (2010), 외국학연구소
- 이지연, "부조리에 대한 변론: 오베리우 미학과 ‘진정한 실재’의 탐구", 노어노문학, 23(1), pp.289~315 (2011), 한국노어노문학회
- 이희원, "20세기 초 러시아 문학장의 다원주의 시학과 네오리얼리즘", 외국문학연구, 41(41), pp.327~364 (2011), 외국문학연구소
- 차지원, "러시아 상징주의와 실재의 탐색 (I) :실재의 전환(轉換), 혹은 “ad realibus a realiora”", 외국학연구, (17), pp.247~272 (2011), 외국학연구소
- James, H., "The Art of the Novel: Critical prefaces" (1934), C. Scribner’s sons
- Hutchings, S., "Russian Literary Culture in the Camera Age" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- Абишева, У., "Неореализм в русской литературе 1900 - 1910-х годов" (2006), Дис. ...док. филол. наук
- Борев, Ю., "Литература и литературная теория ⅩⅩ века. Перспективынового столетия", Теоретико-литературные итоги ⅩⅩ века:Литературное произведение и художественный процесс, 1, pp.6~48 (2003)
- Замятин, Е., "Собрание сочинений в 5 т. Т. 4" (1988), Мюнхен
- Замятин, Е., "Собрание сочинений в 5 т. Т. 5" (2011), Трудное мастер ство
- Кандинский, В., "Избранные труды по теории искусства в 2 т. Т", Kandinskij, 1~ (1914)
- Крученых, А., "Декларация слова как такового", pp.44~45 (1999), Зименкова, Русский футуризм
- Ханзен-Леве, О., "Русский формализм: Методологическая реконструкцияразвития на основе принципа остранения" (2001), Язык русской ку льтуры
- Шкловский, В., "Искусство как прием. О теории прозы", pp.9~25 (1983), Советский писатель
- "De'but de siecle, или От пост- к прото-. Манифест нового века. Знамя, 5" (2001)[URL]
