러시아 형식주의와 야우스의 「문예학의 도전으로의 문학사」
Russian Formalism and Jauss’s “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The modern literary environment is incomparably complex compared to the literary environment of the 18th or 19th centuries. Literature research, which focuses only on writers and works, cannot properly reflect modern literary practices without considering reader. This article is devoted to examining the influence of Russian formalism on German Reception Theory, which for the first time included the being of the reader in the method of literary research. From the point of view of the theory of reception, we are trying to rethink some concepts of Russian formalism, such as ‘Ostanenie’, ‘plot and story’, ‘motivation’, ‘The Evolution of Literature’, ‘Literary Mores’. The influence of formalism on the genesis and development of Reception theory was critical, but it was certainly significant. Looking back on the influence relationship between these two theories, we could confirm the extensibility of formalism and the legacy left behind in modern literature theory.
Abstract
The modern literary environment is incomparably complex compared to the literary environment of the 18th or 19th centuries. Literature research, which focuses only on writers and works, cannot properly reflect modern literary practices without considering reader. This article is devoted to examining the influence of Russian formalism on German Reception Theory, which for the first time included the being of the reader in the method of literary research. From the point of view of the theory of reception, we are trying to rethink some concepts of Russian formalism, such as ‘Ostanenie’, ‘plot and story’, ‘motivation’, ‘The Evolution of Literature’, ‘Literary Mores’. The influence of formalism on the genesis and development of Reception theory was critical, but it was certainly significant. Looking back on the influence relationship between these two theories, we could confirm the extensibility of formalism and the legacy left behind in modern literature theory.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김종태, "미학의 문제와 방법" (2007), 서울대학교출판부
- 김현, "문학사회학" (1983), 민음사
- 변광배, "사르트르와 바르트의 ‘작가-독자론’ 비교 연구", 외국문학연구, (44), pp.55~80 (2011), 외국문학연구소
- 어얼리치, 빅토르, "러시아형식주의" (1984), 문학과 지성사
- 이득재, "인지과학과 문학", 서강인문논총, (40), pp.5~34 (2014), 인문과학연구소
- 하선규, "미학의 역사" (2007), 서울대학교출판부
- Барт Р., "Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика", pp.384~391 (1989), Прогресс
- Троцкий Л., "Литература и революция" (1924), Гос. издательство
- Ханзен-Леве О.А., "Русский формализм. Методологическаяреконструкция развития на основе принципа остранения" (2001), Языки русской культуры
- Шкловский В., "Воскрешение слова. Гамбургский счет(1914-1933)", pp.36~73 (1990), Советский писатель
- Эйхенбаум Б, "Литературный быт", pp.428~436 (1987), Советскийписатель
- Эйхенбаум Б., "История западной литературы, О литературе", pp.294~297 (1987), Советский писатель
- Яусс Х.Р., "История литературы как провокация литературоведения", Новое литературное обозрение, 12, pp.34~84 (1995)
- Яусс Х.Р., "К проблеме диалогического понимания", Вопросыфилософии, 12, pp.103~112 (1994)
- Davis, T.F., "Formalist Criticism and Reader-Response Theory" (2002), Palgrave
- Holub, R.C., "The Reception Theory. A Critical Introduction" (1984), Routledge
- Jauss H.R., "Aesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics" (1982), U of Minnesota P
- Tompkins J.P., "Reader-response Criticism: from Formalism to Post-structuraism", pp.201~231 (1980), The Johns Hopkins U. P
- Tompkins J.P., "Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism", pp.9~26 (1980), The Johns Hopkins U. P
- Tyson L., "Critical Theory Today" (2015), Routledge