도스토예프스키와 톨스토이 시학에 나타난 공감의 문제 연구
A Study on Sympathy in the Dostoevsky’s and Tolstoy’s Poetics
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is focused on the sympathy in Dostoevsky’s and Tolstoy’s poetics. For Dostoevsky, sympathy is based on the social dimension, which is connected with his experience. Though the writer may have thought of the many prisoners he met in Siberian as his own and others, he saw in them the ‘Marey’ that he had met in his childhood, and the spirituality that lies within Marey is no different from his faith. In other words, Dostoevsky discovered that they also have faith in common and that it is the main code of understanding them and a link that can be one with them. It differs from the intellectuals of the time in which the writer lived, in order to approach the people, in the sense of reason, logic, or any justification. For Tolstoy, on the other hand, sympathy can be considered in terms of morality and practice. Tolstoy’s sympathy extends from the individual to the social level, whereas Dostoevsky’s sympathy moves from the social dimension to the individual dimension. Through his personal experience and enlightenment, he emphasizes sympathy in the process of practicing what he realizes in society. In other words, after sympathy, he tried to practice his sympathy and realization. It was not for the Russian people or the Slavs, but for the whole human race. In this sense, Tolstoy tried to overcome the partiality of empathy and tried to obtain universality of sympathy. In particular, Tolstoy emphasizes that patriotism is an example of bias in empathy and should be guarded.
Abstract
This paper is focused on the sympathy in Dostoevsky’s and Tolstoy’s poetics. For Dostoevsky, sympathy is based on the social dimension, which is connected with his experience. Though the writer may have thought of the many prisoners he met in Siberian as his own and others, he saw in them the ‘Marey’ that he had met in his childhood, and the spirituality that lies within Marey is no different from his faith. In other words, Dostoevsky discovered that they also have faith in common and that it is the main code of understanding them and a link that can be one with them. It differs from the intellectuals of the time in which the writer lived, in order to approach the people, in the sense of reason, logic, or any justification. For Tolstoy, on the other hand, sympathy can be considered in terms of morality and practice. Tolstoy’s sympathy extends from the individual to the social level, whereas Dostoevsky’s sympathy moves from the social dimension to the individual dimension. Through his personal experience and enlightenment, he emphasizes sympathy in the process of practicing what he realizes in society. In other words, after sympathy, he tried to practice his sympathy and realization. It was not for the Russian people or the Slavs, but for the whole human race. In this sense, Tolstoy tried to overcome the partiality of empathy and tried to obtain universality of sympathy. In particular, Tolstoy emphasizes that patriotism is an example of bias in empathy and should be guarded.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김태연, "도스또예프스끼의 『작가의 일기』에 나타난 민족주의 의식", 슬라브학보, 26(2), pp.3~39 (2011), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- 권철근, "도스토예프스키 장편소설 연구: 겸허와 오만의 인간학" (2006), 한국외대 출판부
- 도스토예프스키, "죽음의 집의 기록" (2000), 열린책들
- 모출스키 콘스탄틴, "도스토예프스키1, 2" (2000), 책세상
- 스미스 애덤, "도덕감정론" (2009), 비봉출판사
- 백준현, "『스쩨빤치꼬보 마을 사람들』과 『죽음의 집의 기록』에 나타난 자유의 양상과 의미", 러시아어문학연구논집, (58), pp.63~94 (2017), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 석봉래, "고통의 철학과 심리학", 인간.환경.미래, (15), pp.3~36 (2015), 인간환경미래연구원[DOI]
- 오원교, "도스토예프스키와 아시아 ― 『작가 일기 』를 중심으로", 러시아연구, 22(2), pp.63~86 (2012), 러시아연구소[DOI]
- 이길주, "도스또옙스끼의 민족주의와 반유토피아 사상: <<작가일기>>를 중심으로", 사회과학연구, 15, pp.1~41 (1997)
- 조유선, "톨스토이와 도스토예프스키: 인간 고통의 두 양상", 러시아어문학연구논집, (36), pp.149~174 (2011), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 톨스토이 레프, "국가는 폭력이다" (2016), 달팽이
- 홍기순, "F.M. 도스또옙스끼의 종교ㆍ철학적 체계의 특수성 고찰", 노어노문학, 21(2), pp.397~424 (2009), 한국노어노문학회
- 흄 데이빗, "인간본성에 관한 논고3-도덕에 관하여" (2008), 서광사
- Достоевский Ф.М., "Полн. собр. соч в 30 т. Т. 4, 20, 22, 25, 27, 28" (1988), Наука
- Гришин Д.В., "Достоевский-человек, писатель, мифы", pp.41~158 (1971), Мельбурнский уни-т
- Петков Т. М., "『Записки из Мертвого Дома』 Достоевского-поэтикаи проблематика. диссертация ... кандидата филологических наук" (1985), Воронежского уни-та
- Протоиерей Д．Г．, "Достоевский и церковь", pp.3~173 (2002), Изд－во Православного Свято－Тихоновского Богословского Института
- Райнхард Лаут, "Философия Достоевского", pp.5~411 (1996), Республика
- Розенблюм Л. М., "Творческие дневники Достоевского", pp.9~88 (1981), Наука
- Толстой Л., "Собр. соч. в 12 т. Т. 8" (1987), Правда
- Штейнберг А., ". Система свободы Достоевского", pp.9~144 (1980), YMCA Press
- Berman Anna, "Siblings in Tolstoy and Dostoevsky", pp.19~160 (2015), Northwestern UP
- Frank J., "Dostoevsky: The Mantle of Prophet, 1871-1881", pp.65~319 (2002), Princeton U.P
- Gromova Lidia, "Lev Tolstoy and the concept of brotherhood", pp.5~22 (1996), LEGAS
- Holland K., "Dostoevsky in context", pp.288~294 (2015), Cambridge UP
- Ivanits L., "Dostoevsky and the russian people", pp.8~188 (2011), Cambridge UP
- Rancour-Laferriere Daniel, "Tolstoy’s Quest for God", pp.89~166 (2007), NJUP
- Rosenshield G., "Isai Fomich Bumshtein: The Representation of the Jew in Dostoevsky’s Major Fiction", The Russian Review, 43, pp.261~276 (1984)
- Saul Morson Gary, "Lev Tolstoy and the concept of brotherhood", pp.38~50 (1996), LEGAS