공감의 두 양상: 『백치』와 『부활』을 중심으로
Two Aspects of an Empathy-a Study on F.M. Dostoevsky's Idiot and L.N.Tolstoy's Resurrection
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to compare the empathy of Dostoevsky 's novel 『Idiot』 and Tolstoy' s novel 『Resurrection』. The empathy can be seen not only in the emotional dimension, but also in the cognitive and the will dimension. Myshkin was emotional, lacking reflection and moral standards. He sympathized with almost all characters, but his empathy could not stop heroine's death. On the other hand, the empathy of Nekhliudov and Katiusha is not limited to the relationship of two people and it is gradually expanded by sympathy with others. His empathy develops with compassion and love for others through reflection on oneself. Thus, while the empathy of Myshkin is a passive level of empathy, Nekhliudov’s empathy is an active level of empathy
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to compare the empathy of Dostoevsky 's novel 『Idiot』 and Tolstoy' s novel 『Resurrection』. The empathy can be seen not only in the emotional dimension, but also in the cognitive and the will dimension. Myshkin was emotional, lacking reflection and moral standards. He sympathized with almost all characters, but his empathy could not stop heroine's death. On the other hand, the empathy of Nekhliudov and Katiusha is not limited to the relationship of two people and it is gradually expanded by sympathy with others. His empathy develops with compassion and love for others through reflection on oneself. Thus, while the empathy of Myshkin is a passive level of empathy, Nekhliudov’s empathy is an active level of empathy
참고문헌 (22)
- 김상봉, "호모 에티쿠스" (1999), 한길사
- 김효은, "고통의 도덕심리학과 공감의 양상들", 철학논집, 43, pp.41~77 (2015), 철학연구소[DOI]
- 데이빗 흄, "인간본성에 관한 논고3-도덕에 관하여" (2008), 서광사
- 도스토예프스키, "백치 상, 중, 하" (1997), 범우사
- 맹주만, "흄과 공감의 도덕성", 철학탐구, 36, pp.37~69 (2014), 중앙철학연구소[DOI]
- 박희숙, "인간행동과 사회환경" (2017), 창지사
- 셸러 막스, "공감의 본질과 형식" (2013), 지만지
- 소병일, "감정의 도덕심리학적인고찰" (2014), 한국학술정보
- 오세윤, "공감으로 소통하는 공동체" (2016), 법문사
- 이연희, "찰스 테일러의 관점에서 본 도덕행위자의 자아정체성", 倫理硏究, 1(102), pp.89~122 (2015), 한국윤리학회[DOI]
- 조은숙, "공감에 기초한 배려윤리교육 연구", 석사, 철학교육전공, pp.2013
- 조혜경, "영혼 구원을 위한 공감: 『카라마조프 형제들』에 나타난 드미트리의 운명을 중심으로", 노어노문학, 30(4), pp.123~142 (2018), 한국노어노문학회
- 조혜경, "도스토예프스키와 톨스토이 시학에 나타난 공감의 문제 연구", 러시아어문학연구논집, (60), pp.135~160 (2018), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 존슨 마크, "도덕적 상상력" (2008), 서광사
- 톨스토이, "부활 1, 2" (2011), 민음사
- 한상연, "공감의 존재론" (2018), 세창출판사
- Горелов, А.А., "Толстойсегодня: Материалы Толстовских чтений 2012 г", pp.153~171 (2012), Гос. музейТолстого
- Достоевский, "Полн. собр. соч в 30 т" (1973), Наука
- Толстой Л., "Собр. соч в 12 т., Т. 10" (1987), Правда
- Мелешко, Е.Д., "Материалы Толстовских чтений 2014 г" (2015), музей Толстого
- Sarah J. Young, "Dostoevsky’s Idiot and the Ethical Foundations of narrative" (2004), Anthem press
- Mclean Hugh, "In quest of Tolstoy" (2008), Academic Studies Press