본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

도스토예프스키의 「온순한 여자」에 나타난 ‘오만’과 ‘온순’의 구조 시학

Poetics of Arrogance and Meekness in 『A Meek Creature』 of F. M. Dostoevsky

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The primary goal of this paper is to pursue the main idea of 『A Meek Creature』 of F. M. Dostoevsky through its structural peculiarity. Many critics have analyzed this work, focusing on the eminent structure of interior monologue with which the husband of a meek woman, who committed suicide just before, narrates his own psychology. But analyzing contents of this work only under this structural frame hinders us from concrete understanding of internal world of the meek woman who attains not only the trait of meekness but also of arrogance. In the <From the author> of this work we can understand that Dostoevsky uses artistic variations which help to successfully forming the shape of the heroine of this work. From this we can understand that husband and wife of this work share the traits of meekness and arrogance. The exact meaning of meekness reveals itself on the changed shape of young wife of part two of this work and in the scene when she commits suicide with an icon in her hand. This represents symbolically that she has taken her own life with the spirit of unity with her husband who oppressed her with his own philosophy of silentness which is based on his hatred against the world. Such a silent death of meekness which takes the fault of her husband for herself represents the right essence of meekness which Dostoevsky wanted to cultivate in the chaotic russian society of that time.

Abstract

The primary goal of this paper is to pursue the main idea of 『A Meek Creature』 of F. M. Dostoevsky through its structural peculiarity. Many critics have analyzed this work, focusing on the eminent structure of interior monologue with which the husband of a meek woman, who committed suicide just before, narrates his own psychology. But analyzing contents of this work only under this structural frame hinders us from concrete understanding of internal world of the meek woman who attains not only the trait of meekness but also of arrogance. In the <From the author> of this work we can understand that Dostoevsky uses artistic variations which help to successfully forming the shape of the heroine of this work. From this we can understand that husband and wife of this work share the traits of meekness and arrogance. The exact meaning of meekness reveals itself on the changed shape of young wife of part two of this work and in the scene when she commits suicide with an icon in her hand. This represents symbolically that she has taken her own life with the spirit of unity with her husband who oppressed her with his own philosophy of silentness which is based on his hatred against the world. Such a silent death of meekness which takes the fault of her husband for herself represents the right essence of meekness which Dostoevsky wanted to cultivate in the chaotic russian society of that time.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 라브린, 얀코, "도스토예프스키" (1981), 행림출판사
  2. Бекедин П. В, "Повесть ≪Кроткая≫: К истолкованию образа мёртвого солнца, In Достоевский: Материалы и Исследования", pp.102~124 (1988), Наука
  3. Бердяев Н. А, "Миросозерцание Достоевского" (2006), Аст
  4. Гроссман Л, "Достоевский" (1963), Молодая гвардия
  5. Гус М, "Достоевского" (1971), Художественная литература
  6. Достоевский Ф. М, "Полное собрание сочинений в тридцати томах" (1990), Наука
  7. Захаров В. Н, "Система Жанров Достоевского" (1985), Издательство Ленинградского Университета
  8. Клейман П. Я, "Сквозные мотивы творчества Достоевского; В историко-культурной перспективе" (1985), Штиинца
  9. Кожевникова В. М, "Литературный Энциклопедический Словарь" (1987), Советская Энциклопедия
  10. Туниманов В. А, "Приёмы повествования в ≪Кроткой≫ Ф. М. Достоевского, In Вести. Ленинградского университета" (1965), языка и литературы
  11. Фридлендер Г, "О некоторых очередных задачах и проблемах изучения Достоевского, In Достоевский: Материалы и исследования. т. 4", pp.7~26 (1988), Наука
  12. Bakhtin M, "Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. trans. Caryl Emerson" (1984), University of Minnesota Press
  13. Cox G, "Tyrant and Victim in Dostoevsky" (1984), Slavica Publisher's
  14. Gide André, "Dostoevsky" (1952), Secker&Warburg
  15. Hingley R, "Dostoevsky: His Life and Work" (1978), Charles Scribner's Sons
  16. Holquist M, "Dostoevsky and the Novel" (1977), Princeton Univ. Press
  17. Jones J, "Dostoevsky" (1985), Oxford Univ. Press
  18. Magarshack D, "Dostoevsky" (1962), Greenwood Press
  19. Mochulsky K, "Dostoevsky: His Life and Work" (1967), Princeton Univ. Press
  20. Pachmuss Temira, "Theme of Vanity in Dostoevskij's works", SEEJ, 7(2), pp.142~159 (1963)
  21. Walsh H, "The Permutations of Complex Metaphor: Dostoevsky's Sunsets", SEEJ, 27(3), pp.293~301 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)