도스토예프스키의 「역겨운 일화」에 나타난 휴머니즘
A study on humanism in Dostoevsky’s A nasty tale
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Dostoevsky asks us to think about what humanism really is by satire of humanism insisted by the characters in the short story 「A nasty tale」. In other words, Dostoevsky uncovers the falsehood of humanism insisted by liberals in the 1860s. This paper analyzes the humanism asserted by the characters in the novel in this context, and ultimately seeks to clarify the issues of humanism that Dostoevsky considered. In his short story, Dostoevsky satirized the empty claims and shamelessness of the land and liberated humanist, revealing the hatred, antipathy and disgust of the Russian people against the upper classes, bureaucrats and nobles. In the 1860s, liberals not only understood the people abstractly, but also accepted love for them as a theory of humanism. What they lacked is the practice of humanism based on love and brotherhood. Whether or not the practice of humanism guarantees the overall reform of society is another matter. Humanism is not about slogans for reform, but reforms for human values and happiness. That is a reform for humanism.
Abstract
Dostoevsky asks us to think about what humanism really is by satire of humanism insisted by the characters in the short story 「A nasty tale」. In other words, Dostoevsky uncovers the falsehood of humanism insisted by liberals in the 1860s. This paper analyzes the humanism asserted by the characters in the novel in this context, and ultimately seeks to clarify the issues of humanism that Dostoevsky considered. In his short story, Dostoevsky satirized the empty claims and shamelessness of the land and liberated humanist, revealing the hatred, antipathy and disgust of the Russian people against the upper classes, bureaucrats and nobles. In the 1860s, liberals not only understood the people abstractly, but also accepted love for them as a theory of humanism. What they lacked is the practice of humanism based on love and brotherhood. Whether or not the practice of humanism guarantees the overall reform of society is another matter. Humanism is not about slogans for reform, but reforms for human values and happiness. That is a reform for humanism.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김향숙, "아담 스미스의 공감이 도덕교육에 주는 의미", 석사, 초등도덕교육, pp.2007
- 계동준, "『연기』와 『여름인상에 관한 겨울 메모』에 나타난 서구주의와 슬라브주의", 슬라브연구, 9, pp.187~196 (1993)
- 누스바움, "분노와 용서" (2018), 뿌리와 이파리
- 도스토예프스키, "악몽 같은 이야기" (2000), 열린책들
- 모슨 게리 솔, "도스토옙스키" (2018), 우물이 있는 집
- 조슈아 그린, "옳고 그름: 분열과 갈등의 시대, 왜 다시 도덕인가" (2017), 시공사
- 조주관, "도스토예프스키 메타 지식" (2017), 우물이 있는 집
- 조혜경, "도스토예프스키 철학 체계에서 대지주의 위치와 역할", 러시아어문학연구논집, 9, pp.75~100 (2001)
- 조혜경, "유럽에서 러시아를 보다: 도스토예프스키와 유럽", 동서인문, (6), pp.83~104 (2016), 인문학술원
- 함영준, "러시아 특수성과 보편성에 관한 연구(2)", 슬라브연구, 14, pp.93~127 (1998)
- 홍기순, "F.M. 도스또옙스끼의 종교ㆍ철학적 체계의 특수성 고찰", 노어노문학, 21(2), pp.397~424 (2009), 한국노어노문학회
- Достоевский Ф. М., "Полн собр. соч. в 30 т. Т. 5, Т. 28-1" (1973), Наука
- Живолупова Н. В., "Достоевский и современность", pp.121~130 (1994), Новгород
- Кирпотин В. Я., "Достоевский. Т. 2" (1978), Художественная Литература
- Лаут Р, "Философия Достоевского" (1996), Республика
- Bagno V.E., "Europe as Goddaughter (Dostoevsky's second Homeland)", Russian Studies in Philosophy, 50(3), pp.48~56 (2011)
- Frank J, "Dostoevsky: The encounter with Europe", The Russian Review, 22(3), pp.237~252 (1963)
- Frank J, "Dostoevsky-The stir of liberation 1860-1865" (1986), Princeton UP
- Hudspith S, "Dostoevsky and the idea of Russianness" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- Ivanits L, "Dostoevsky and the Russian People" (2011), Cambridge UP
- Mochulsky K, "Dostoevsky-his life and work" (1971), Princeton UP
- Scanlan J. P., "Dostoevsky-the thinker" (2002), Cornell UP
- Wolf P. M., "Dostoevsky’s conception of man: Its impact on Philosophical Anthropology" (1997), Pennsylvania UP