도스토옙스키의 「온순한 여자」와 자살의 문제 : 서술자 분석을 중심으로
Dostoevsky's The Meek One and the Problem of Suicide: Analysis on the Narrator
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to scrutinize Dostoevsky’s thought on the problem of suicide, examining the ‘meekness’ of the heroine in The Meek One by analyzing its narrator. It is the author’s main narrative strategy that the novel has the husband of victim as a narrator. The narrator pretends to repent his past mistreatment of heroine, partly admitting his fault or positing himself as a victim. Furthermore, through responses and excuses to the reader-judge, he keeps denying his own faults. Nevertheless, his deft speech bespeaks that he is the one who caused the suicide of ‘the meek one.’ Therefore, the narrator never accepts the opinions attributing heroine’s death to him. His speech is soliloquy in which debate is hidden, in other words ‘double speech.’ It is noteworthy that his speech style resembles his way of being, isolation. The narrator’s solitary life, however, stems from his desire to communicate. Having been continually ignored by others, he prefers isolation to disgrace. Only person with whom he can control the relationship is the heroine. The husband dominates and abuses his wife, in the meanwhile longs her sincere love. As this distorted emotion deepened, her endurance runs up to the last. After facing the heroine’s corpse, an opportunity to ruminate his past is given to the narrator. His regeneration depends on whether he accepts external speech and being. What is significant to the suicide of the heroine is that it remains as the starting point. In short, her acceptance of inevitable death and its possibility of causing his regeneration demonstrates the meekness of the suicide. Likewise, The Meek One shows multiple aspects of the author’s position on the problem of suicide.
Abstract
This article aims to scrutinize Dostoevsky’s thought on the problem of suicide, examining the ‘meekness’ of the heroine in The Meek One by analyzing its narrator. It is the author’s main narrative strategy that the novel has the husband of victim as a narrator. The narrator pretends to repent his past mistreatment of heroine, partly admitting his fault or positing himself as a victim. Furthermore, through responses and excuses to the reader-judge, he keeps denying his own faults. Nevertheless, his deft speech bespeaks that he is the one who caused the suicide of ‘the meek one.’ Therefore, the narrator never accepts the opinions attributing heroine’s death to him. His speech is soliloquy in which debate is hidden, in other words ‘double speech.’ It is noteworthy that his speech style resembles his way of being, isolation. The narrator’s solitary life, however, stems from his desire to communicate. Having been continually ignored by others, he prefers isolation to disgrace. Only person with whom he can control the relationship is the heroine. The husband dominates and abuses his wife, in the meanwhile longs her sincere love. As this distorted emotion deepened, her endurance runs up to the last. After facing the heroine’s corpse, an opportunity to ruminate his past is given to the narrator. His regeneration depends on whether he accepts external speech and being. What is significant to the suicide of the heroine is that it remains as the starting point. In short, her acceptance of inevitable death and its possibility of causing his regeneration demonstrates the meekness of the suicide. Likewise, The Meek One shows multiple aspects of the author’s position on the problem of suicide.
참고문헌 (30)
- 모슨, 게리솔, "바흐친의 산문학" (2020), 앨피
- 백준현, "도스토예프스키의 「온순한 여자」에 나타난 ‘오만’과 ‘온순’의 구조 시학", 러시아어문학연구논집, (36), pp.35~60 (2011), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 석영중, "러시아 정교" (2009), 고려대학교 출판부
- Бахтин М.М, "Проблемы поэтики Достоевского" (1972), Худож. лит-ра
- Бахтин М.М, "Эстетика словесного творчества" (1979), Искусство
- Достоевский Ф.М, "Полное собрание сочнений в 30 томах" (1990), Наука
- Есаулов И.А, "Художественный мир Достоевского в свете оппозиции‘юродство", шутовство’ и позиция Бахтина: на материалефантастического рассказа «Кроткая», 2018, pp.36, 75~86
- Живолупова Н., "‘Кроткая’ и эволюция жанра исповеди антигероя втворчестве Достоевского", Dostoevsky Studies, 4, pp.129~142 (2000)
- Наседкин Н., "Самоубийство Достоевского: тема суицида в жизни итворчестве писателя" (2002), Алгоритм
- Пис Р., "‘Кроткая’ Достоевского: ряд воспоминаний, ведущих кправде", Материалы и исследования, 14, pp.187~194 (1997)
- "Святые древней Руси: (X-XVII ст.)" (1960)[URL]
- Allian L., "Кроткая и самоубийцы в творчестве Ф.М.Достоевского", Dostoevsky Studies, 4, pp.43~52 (2000)
- Andersen Z., "The Concepts of Domination and Powerlessness in F.M.Dostoevsky’s A Gentle Spirit", Dostoevsky Studies, 4, pp.53~59 (2000)
- Christa B, "‘Money Talks’: The Semiotic Anatomy of ‘Krotkaia’", Dostoevsky Studies, 4, pp.143~152 (2000)
- Cox G, "Tyrant and Victim in Dostoevsky" (1984), Slavica Publishers
- Gaal K., "Iconic Representations in Dostoevsky's Post-Siberian Fiction" (2015), Plenum Publisher
- Gronicka A, "The Russian Image of Goethe. Vol. 2" (1985), University of Pennsylvania Press
- Jackson R, "The Art of Dostoevsky" (1981), Princeton University Press
- Knapp L., "The Force of Inertia in Dostoevsky’s ‘Krotkaja’", Dostoevsky Studies, 6, pp.143~156 (1985)
- Martinsen D, "Surprised by Shame: Dostoevsky’s Liars and Narrative Exposure" (2003), Ohio State University Press
- Mochizuki T, "‘The Pendulum is Swinging Insensibly and Disgustingly’: Time in ‘Krotkaia’", Dostoevsky Studies, 4, pp.71~82 (2000)
- Morrissey S, "Dostoevsky in Context", pp.131~138 (2015), Cambridge University Press
- Murav H., "A Plot of Her Own: the Female Protagonist in Russian Literature", pp.44~57 (1995), Northwestern University Press
- Mørch A, "Celebrating Creativity: Essays in Honor of Jostein Børtnes", pp.226~237 (1997), University of Bergen
- Ollivier S, "Dostoevsky and the Christian Tradition", pp.51~68 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Paperno I., "Suicide as a Cultural Institution in Dostoevsky's Russia" (1997), Cornell University Press
- Shneidman N, "Dostoevsky and Suicide" (1984), Mosaic Press
- Straus N., "Dostoevsky and the Woman Question" (1994), St. Martin's Press
- Tigountsova I, "Dostoevskii's ‘The Meek One’ in the Context of Goethe's ‘Faust’ and Tropes of Time", Modern Language Review, 112(2), pp.459~474 (2017)
