타자 윤리학의 관점에서 본 고통의 의미: 도스토예프스키의 「우스운 자의 꿈」을 중심으로
The Meaning of Suffering on the basis of the Other Ethics
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The suffering of the ridiculous man in Dostoevsky's novel “The Dream of a Ridiculous Man” is significant in terms of other ethics. The protagonist's exterior of the suffering of others caused guilt-induced suffering. The pain was caused by shame and anger at himself. Moral sense may be strange to the protagonist who is unfamiliar with feelings. However, in the dream, the protagonist faces greater pain, feeling guilty as a source of moral corruption after committing suicide by shooting with a chest. However, the pain is not a pain to be avoided anymore, it is a cross-like pain to bear on its own, and comes from solidarity and responsibility for others. The character of the pain did not change, but the protagonist's attitude toward the pain changed. The main reason for the protagonist's attitude change is the act of seeing and enlightening. In a dream, the protagonist looks at himself by facing the other person he has turned away, realizing the truth, and recalling a girl he met in reality. The protagonist ‘seeing’ provides a perspective of reflection and insight. Before dreaming, the protagonist tried not to look and ignore the other's request, but to see the people and himself properly in the dream, reduce his responsibility for the fall, solidarity, and the need for atonement, and the girl he turned away after waking up. In search of 'seeing', they take a gesture of response to the other.
Abstract
The suffering of the ridiculous man in Dostoevsky's novel “The Dream of a Ridiculous Man” is significant in terms of other ethics. The protagonist's exterior of the suffering of others caused guilt-induced suffering. The pain was caused by shame and anger at himself. Moral sense may be strange to the protagonist who is unfamiliar with feelings. However, in the dream, the protagonist faces greater pain, feeling guilty as a source of moral corruption after committing suicide by shooting with a chest. However, the pain is not a pain to be avoided anymore, it is a cross-like pain to bear on its own, and comes from solidarity and responsibility for others. The character of the pain did not change, but the protagonist's attitude toward the pain changed. The main reason for the protagonist's attitude change is the act of seeing and enlightening. In a dream, the protagonist looks at himself by facing the other person he has turned away, realizing the truth, and recalling a girl he met in reality. The protagonist ‘seeing’ provides a perspective of reflection and insight. Before dreaming, the protagonist tried not to look and ignore the other's request, but to see the people and himself properly in the dream, reduce his responsibility for the fall, solidarity, and the need for atonement, and the girl he turned away after waking up. In search of 'seeing', they take a gesture of response to the other.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강영안, "타인의 얼굴 : 레비나스의 철학" (2005), 문학과지성사
- 김수환, "도스토예프스키 소설에서 말과 이미지의 문제: 단편 ？우스운 사람의 꿈？을 중심으로", 슬라브학보, 20(2), pp.51~80 (2005), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- 김왕배, "도덕감정: 부채의식과 감사, 죄책감의 연대", 사회와 이론, (23), pp.135~172 (2013), 한국이론사회학회
- 도스토예프스키, "우스운 사람의 꿈" (2000), 열린책들
- 모출스키, "도스토예프스키 2" (2001), 책세상
- 석영중, "도스토옙스키와 시각 시각 학습과 윤리의 문제", 러시아어문학연구논집, (65), pp.63~84 (2019), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 박한표, "볼테르의 『캉디드 혹은 낙관주의』의 소설적 여정에서 나타나는 세계와 ‘정원’의 의미", 프랑스학연구, (72), pp.131~162 (2015), 프랑스학회
- 배준형, "시간에 관한 유아론적 연대기 : 레비나스를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2016
- 백준현, "『우스운 인간의 꿈』 - 유아론(唯我論)의 패러디인가? 진리의 구현인가?", 노어노문학, 20(4), pp.209~241 (2008), 한국노어노문학회
- 변상규, "자아상의 치유" (2012), NUN
- 변순용, "타자의 윤리학-레비나스를 중심으로", 국민윤리연구, 45, pp.47~66 (2000)
- 이효숙, "미크로메가스" (2011), 바다출판사
- 스미스, "도덕감정론" (2009), 비봉출판사
- 이안나, "레비나스 타자윤리와 도덕성", 석사, 윤리(교육학), pp.2009
- 정보라, "도스토옙스키의《우스운 사람의 꿈》과 유토피아", 노어노문학, 22(1), pp.155~184 (2010), 한국노어노문학회
- 조유선, "톨스토이와 도스토예프스키: 인간 고통의 두 양상", 러시아어문학연구논집, (36), pp.149~174 (2011), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 최진석, "타자 윤리학의 두 가지 길 ― 바흐친과 레비나스", 노어노문학, 21(3), pp.173~195 (2009), 한국노어노문학회
- 흄, "도덕에 관하여" (1998), 서광사
- Бахтин, М, "Проблемы поэтики Достоевского" (1979), Советская Россия
- Гус М, "Идеи и образы Ф. М. Достоевского" (1971), Худ. литература
- Джексон Р.Л, "Искусство Достоевского" (1998), РАДИКС
- Достоевский Ф.М, "Полн собр. соч в 30 т. Т. 23, 24, 25" (1973), Наука
- Клюкина Е.Н, "Апология христианства в фантастическом рассказеФ.М. Достоевского <<Сон смешнего человека>>", Studia Culturae, 33(3), pp.15~31 (2017)
- Седов А.Ф, "Мотив золотого века в творчестве Ф. М. Достоевского1870-х годов", Достоевский и современность. Новгород, ~ (1994)
- Туниманов В, "Сатира и утопия", Русская литература, 9(4), pp.70~87 (1966)
- Frank J, "Dostoevsky: the Mantle of the Prophet, 1871-1881" (2002), Princeton Univ. Press
- Holquist, M, "Dostoevsky and the Novel" (1977), Princeton Univ. Press
- Jackson R.L, "Dostoevsky: New Perspectives" (1984), Prentice-Hall Inc
- Martinsen D, "Dostoevsky beyond Dostoevsky" (2016), Academic Studies Press
- Morson G.S, "The Boundaries of Genre: Dostoevsky’s Diary of a Writer and the Traditions of Literary Utopia" (1981), Northwestern Univ. Press
- Rowe W. W, "Dostoevsky: Child and Man in His Works" (1968), New York Univ. Press
- Wasiolek, "Dostoevsky: The Major Fiction" (1964), M. I. T. Press