러시아 문학과 한국 문학의 미적 근대성과 ‘창조된 고전/정전’ 연구
A Study on Aesthetic Modernity and ‘Inventing The Classics/The Canon’ in Russian Literature and Korean Literature
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Inventing The Classics/The Canon does not consist of a fixed set of rules, but it is always subject to revision. Inevitably, an issue of Classics/Canon is closely related to teaching methodology and a fossilized Classics/Canon can produce outmoded pedagogy and vice versa. First of all, this article is an analysis of Aesthetic Modernity, which is renowned as a key piece of literature in Russian Korean modern literature. The main purpose of this paper was to find out how Chehov’s work and Lee Tae-Jun’s work were interpreted in the course of modern history(aesthetic modernity) and to analyze any political issues/ideology involved with interpretation of inventing The Classics/The Canon. In the end, this article revealed that both Chehov’s and Lee Tae-Jun’s work have been interpreted in the course of inventing The Classics/The Canon. My first point is in relation to the formation of inventing The Classics/The Canon. My second point is in relation to the reproduction of inventing The Classics/The Canon. Based on this idea the main theme was analyzed.
Abstract
Inventing The Classics/The Canon does not consist of a fixed set of rules, but it is always subject to revision. Inevitably, an issue of Classics/Canon is closely related to teaching methodology and a fossilized Classics/Canon can produce outmoded pedagogy and vice versa. First of all, this article is an analysis of Aesthetic Modernity, which is renowned as a key piece of literature in Russian Korean modern literature. The main purpose of this paper was to find out how Chehov’s work and Lee Tae-Jun’s work were interpreted in the course of modern history(aesthetic modernity) and to analyze any political issues/ideology involved with interpretation of inventing The Classics/The Canon. In the end, this article revealed that both Chehov’s and Lee Tae-Jun’s work have been interpreted in the course of inventing The Classics/The Canon. My first point is in relation to the formation of inventing The Classics/The Canon. My second point is in relation to the reproduction of inventing The Classics/The Canon. Based on this idea the main theme was analyzed.
참고문헌 (27)
- 강명수, "체호프 문학의 몇 가지 쟁점" (2009), 보고사
- 강명수, "해설－벚나무 동산, In 벚나무 동산" (2012), 지만지
- 강진호, "1930년대 후반기 소설의 전통지향성 연구 － 이태준을 중심으로, In 근대 문학과 이태준" (2000), 깊은샘
- 김윤식, "『문장』지의 세계관, In 한국근대문학사상비판" (1978), 일지사
- 김춘식, "미적 근대성과 동인지 문단" (2003), 소명출판사
- 김혜영, "정전(正典)" (2010), 역락
- 마테 칼리니스쿠, "모더니티의 다섯 얼굴" (1991), 시각과 언어
- 박인기, "문학교육과 문학 정전의 새로운 관계 맺기, In 정전" (2010), 역락
- 박진숙, "이태준과 현대소설사" (2004), 깊은샘
- 박헌호, "구인회를 어떻게 볼 것인가, In 근대문학과 구인회" (1996), 깊은샘
- 블라디슬로프 타타르키비츠, "미학의 기본 개념사" (1990), 미진사
- 알렉산드르 추다코프, "체호프의 세계" (2001), 소명
- 알렉산드르 추다코프, "체호프와 그의 시대" (2004), 소명출판
- 윤여탁, "한국의 문학 교육과 정전: 그 역사와 의미, In 정전" (2010), 역락
- 이광호, "미적 근대성과 한국문학사" (2011), 민음사
- 이명희, "『시와 소설』과 구인회의 의미, In 근대문학과 구인회" (1996), 깊은샘
- 이선미, "‘구인회’의 소설가들과 모더니즘의 문제: 이태준과 박태원의 경우, In 근대문학과 구인회" (1996), 깊은샘
- 이철, "러시아 문학사" (1994), 벽호
- 피터 부르디외, "상징폭력과 문화재생산" (1995), 새물결
- 하루오 시라네, "창조된 고전" (2002), 소명
- 허윤회, "시대의 인식과 그 불협화 - 이태준의 문학에 나타난 모더니즘과 상고주의 논의에 대하여, In 근대문학과 이태준" (2000), 깊은샘
- Charles-Augustin Saint-Beuve, "What is Classic?, In The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends" (1989), St. Martin's Press
- Durkin, A. R., "Chehov and the journal of his time, In Literary Journals in Imperial Russia" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Grossman, J. D., "Rise and decline of the ‘literary’ journal 1880-1917, In Literary Journals in Imperial Russia" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Guillory, J., "Canon, In Critical Terms for Literary Study" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Громов, М., "Чехов" (1993), Молодая Гвардия
- Степанов, Ю. С., "Словарь русской культурь" (1997), Языки русской культуры