본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Toulmin의 논증의 옹호와 교육적 적용에 대한 탐색

The Advocation and Educational Application about Toulmin's Argument Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류철학

초록

이 연구의 목적은 전통적인 고전 논리학의 하나인 연역 논증과 귀납 논증을 비판하고, 그들을 포괄할 수 있는 현대 논리학의 하나인 비형식 논증인 Toulmin의 논증 모형을 옹호하고, 그러한 비형식 논증의 교육적 가능성을 탐색한다. 이 연구를 통해서, 우리는 Toulmin의 논증 모형을 구성하는 많은 요소들은 서로 상호작용하면서 논증의 타당성과 건전성을 확보함을 강조하였다. 또한 Toulmin의 논증모형의 문제점을 점검하고 개선점을 제안하였다. 끝으로 Toulmin의 논증에 대한 교육적 적용필요성, 하나의 일반적인 사용 전략과 구성주의적 철학적 위치를 탐색하였다.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to criticize the deductive argument and inductive argument of a kind of classical logic, and advocate the Toulmin's argument model, the informal logic among a contemporary logic. In this article, We emphasized that Toulmin's argument model was justified by their validity and soundness on account of the interactions of elements of argument, and investigated with the educational aplication of education, the strategies of application's goals, and the status of constructivism philosophy based on Toulmin's argument model.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. 강순민, "과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특징", 박사, pp.2004
  2. 김기철, "초등학생의 논증하는 글쓰기 능력 위계 연구", 석사, pp.2005
  3. 김태오, "구성주의 패러다임의 측면에서 본 작문 이론의 전개 동향-인지구성주의 작문이론과 사회 구성주의 작문이론을 중심으로-", 초등교과교육연구, 2, pp.62~95 (1999)
  4. 김복순, "대학 말하기, 하, 토론의 방법" (2007), 국학자료원
  5. 김인애, "논증 도식 지도를 통한 논술 교수-학습 방안 연구", 석사, pp.2007
  6. 박준호, "비형식 논리학의 논증과 논증 평가 개념", 범한철학, 34(3), pp.151~175 (2004), 범한철학회
  7. 박영목, "논증개념의 체계화 연구", 교육연구논총, 22, pp.17~42 (2005)
  8. 백춘현, "민사고 논술(입문)" (2005), 도서출판 민사고
  9. 유지현, "온라인 토론 학습에서 논증모델의 활용이 학습자의 인지양식에 따라 논증기술 향상에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.2003
  10. 임태섭, "광고 메시지의 질적 접근", 광고 연구, 21, pp.327~366 (1993)
  11. 조규락, "논증 스캐폴드와 문제의 유형이 논증의 질,문제해결 성취도 및 집단의 효과성에 미치는 효과", 교육공학연구, 18(3), pp.55~82 (2002), 한국교육공학회
  12. 하병학, "토론과 설득을 위한 우리들의 논리" (2001), 철학과 현실사
  13. Blair, J. Anthony, "Everyday Argumentation from an informal Logic Perspective, In Readings in Argumentation", pp.357~375 (1992), Foris Publications
  14. Bell, P., "Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE", International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp.797~818 (2000)
  15. Berland, L. K., "Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation", Science education, 93, pp.26~55 (2009)
  16. Chin, C., "Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, pp.109~138 (2000)
  17. Chinn, C. A., ""The Structure of Discussions that Promote Reasoning"", Teacher College Record, 100(21), pp.315~368 (1988)
  18. Clark, D. B., "Analyzing the quality of argumentation supported by personally-seeded discussions", Paper presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (2005)
  19. Collins, A., "The logic of plausible reasoning : A core theory", Cognitive Science, 13, pp.1~49 (1989)
  20. Cros, D., "Conceptions of second year university students of some fundamental notions of chemistry", International of Science Education, 10, pp.331~336 (1987)
  21. Crosswhite, J., "이성의 수사학-글쓰기와 논증의 매력" (2001), 고려대학교 출판부
  22. de Vries, E., "Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), pp.63~103 (2002)
  23. Davis, E. A., "Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection : Generic and directed prompts", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), pp.91~142 (2003)
  24. Driver, R., "Young people's images of science" (2000), Open university Press
  25. Driver, R., ""Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84, pp.287~312 (2000)
  26. Duschil, R., "Understanding dialogic argumentation", Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association (1999)
  27. Duschl, R. A., "Making the nature of science explicit, In Improving science education: The contribution of research", pp.187~206 (2000), Open University Press
  28. Fitzgerald, J., "Towards knowledge in writing: illustration from revision studies" (1992), Springer Verlag
  29. Forman, E. A., "Discourse, intersubjectivity and the development of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian approach, In Children's development within social contexts: Metatheoretical, theoretical and methodological issues (Vol. 1)", pp.143~159 (1992), Erlbaum
  30. Freeley, J. A., "Argumentation and Debate" (2005), Wordsworth Publishing Company
  31. Freeman, J. B., "Systematizing Toulmin's Warrants: An Epistemic Approach", Argumentation, 19, pp.331~346 (2005)
  32. Grűnbaum, Adolf, "The Limitations of Deductivism" (1988), University of California Press
  33. Hanson, N., "Patterns of Discovery" (1957), Cambridge University Press
  34. Heeren, J. K., "Teaching chemistry by the Socratic Method", Journal of Chemical Education, 67(4), pp.330~331 (1990)
  35. Irving,M. C., "논리학 입문" (1995), 이론
  36. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., "Doing the lesson” or “doing science”- Argument in high school genetics", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
  37. Johnson, Ralph H., "The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic", Argumentation, 13, pp.265~272 (1999)
  38. Kelly, G. J., "Students' reasoning about electricity : Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis", International journal of Science Education, 20, pp.849~871 (1988)
  39. Kelly, G. J., "Epistemic levels in argument : An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing", Science Education, 86, pp.314~342 (2002)
  40. Gable, D., "Research on problem solving in chemistry, In Handbook of research on science teaching and learning", pp.301~326 (1984), Macmillan
  41. Kuhn, D., "The skills of argument" (1991), Cambridge University press
  42. Lampert, M., "Appreciating the complexity of teaching and learning in school", The journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, pp.365~368 (2002)
  43. Lizotte, D. J., "Teacher practices that support students' construction of scientific explanations in middle school classrooms", Proceedings of the 33rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (2004), Taylor & Francis
  44. Lythcott, J., ""Aristotelian" was given as the answer, but what was the question?", American Journal of Physics, 53(5), pp.428~431 (1985)
  45. Lythcott, J., "Qualitative Research: From Methods to Conclusions", Science Education, 74(4), pp.445~460 (1990)
  46. Novak, J. D., "Learning how to learn" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  47. Pontecorvo, C., "Discussing and reasoning: The role of argument in knowledge construction, In Learning and Instruction: European research in an international context", pp.239~250 (1987), Pergamon
  48. Tindale, J. H., "Argumentation and debate textbooks, An overview of content and focus", Argumentation & Advocacy, 35(40), pp.185~195 (1999)
  49. Renkema. J., "담화연구의 기초" (1997), 한국문화사
  50. Ricke, R. D., "Argumentation and decision making Process (2nd Ed.)" (1984), Scott, Foresman and Company
  51. Ruby, L., "논리적으로 사고하는 기술" (1994), 서광사
  52. Sandoval, W. A., "The Quality od Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations", Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), pp.23~55 (2005)
  53. Sandoval, W.A., "Explanation driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry", science Education, 88, pp.345~372 (2004)
  54. Scardamalia, M., "Computer support for knowledge-building communities", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, pp.265~283 (1994)
  55. Searle, J. R., "Speech acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of language" (1969), Cambridge university press
  56. Schwarz, B. B., "Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentation activity", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), pp.219~256 (2003)
  57. Siegel, H., "Why should educators care about argumentation?", Informal Logic, 17(2), pp.159~176 (1995)
  58. Terry, D. R., "Modern Debate Case Techniques, In Structure of argument in debate", pp.95~101 (1970), National Textbook Company
  59. Toulmin, S., "The uses of Arguments" (1958), Cambridge university press
  60. Toulmin, S, "An introduction to reasoning(2nd ed.)" (1984), Macmillian Publishing Company
  61. Trapp. R., "Discovering the world through debate(3rd Ed.)" (2005), IDEA Press Books
  62. Van Eemeren, F. H., "Fundamentals of Argumentation, theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum
  63. Vigotstsky, L. S., "사회속의 정신: 고등 심리과정의 발당" (1994), 성원사
  64. Veerman, A., "Constructive discussions through electronic dialogue, In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments", pp.117~143 (2003), Kluwer Academic
  65. Willams, J. M., "The Craft of Argument, (3rd ed.)" (2007), Pearson Education, Inc

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)