배아연구와 인간존엄
Human Dignity and Embryo Research
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Before bioethics concerning embryo research began to be discussed, the concrete content of the human dignity has not been so vigorously examined although it is now regarded as one of the main issues in bioethics. Anyone who has opinions about embryo research - whether he argues for or against it - argues on the basis of human dignity. On the other hand, the forms and the degree of embryo protection varies, even if the embryo is protected with the argument of the same human dignity. From these reasons, some questions are raised as follows: whether or not there are universal conceptions of human dignity that anyone can agree with; even so, whether or not there are another factors of human dignity that are able to change according to the community and its culture. To find the answer to above questions, this article has the following structure. Firstly, Kant's End-in-Itself Formula and Dürig's Objekt Formula that have been used as the arguments against embryo research are newly re-interpreted. Nevertheless, it is insisted that these formulas can be still employed for the prohibition of embryo research. After that, diverse arguments of human dignity are introduced that have a different content according to each theory. In conclusion, several fundamental conceptions of human dignity are suggested, which are quite persuasive despite the diversity of the arguments. In the last chapter, it is discussed if an embryo can be an bearer of human dignity according to the Constitution. At last, it is discussed that changeable factors in a human dignity exist, by showing how differently regulation policies of each country take in practice - particularly in South Korea and Germany - although they have the same concept of legal interest of human dignity.
Abstract
Before bioethics concerning embryo research began to be discussed, the concrete content of the human dignity has not been so vigorously examined although it is now regarded as one of the main issues in bioethics. Anyone who has opinions about embryo research - whether he argues for or against it - argues on the basis of human dignity. On the other hand, the forms and the degree of embryo protection varies, even if the embryo is protected with the argument of the same human dignity. From these reasons, some questions are raised as follows: whether or not there are universal conceptions of human dignity that anyone can agree with; even so, whether or not there are another factors of human dignity that are able to change according to the community and its culture. To find the answer to above questions, this article has the following structure. Firstly, Kant's End-in-Itself Formula and Dürig's Objekt Formula that have been used as the arguments against embryo research are newly re-interpreted. Nevertheless, it is insisted that these formulas can be still employed for the prohibition of embryo research. After that, diverse arguments of human dignity are introduced that have a different content according to each theory. In conclusion, several fundamental conceptions of human dignity are suggested, which are quite persuasive despite the diversity of the arguments. In the last chapter, it is discussed if an embryo can be an bearer of human dignity according to the Constitution. At last, it is discussed that changeable factors in a human dignity exist, by showing how differently regulation policies of each country take in practice - particularly in South Korea and Germany - although they have the same concept of legal interest of human dignity.
참고문헌 (38)
- 고봉진, "생명윤리에서의 인간존엄'개념'의 총체성", 법철학연구, 11(1), pp.85~100 (2008), 한국법철학회
- 이계일, "인간의 존엄은 형량가능한가?", 원광법학, 26(1), pp.157~199 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이상돈, "생명공학과 법: 생명의 공학화와 생명문화의 절차적 재생산" (2003), 서울
- 임미원, "생명윤리의 관점에서 본 칸트의 인간존엄의 개념", 칸트연구, (19), pp.271~298 (2007), 한국칸트학회
- 정문식, "독일에서의 인간의 존엄과 생명권의 관계 - 배아줄기세포연구에 있어서 배아의 인간존엄과 생명권 관계를 예로", 공법학연구, 7(2), pp.265~294 (2006), 한국비교공법학회
- Benda, Ernst, "Erprobung der Menschenwürde am Beispiel der Humangenetik. in: Genforschung - Fluch oder Segen?", pp.205~231 (1985), München
- Birnbacher, Dieter, "Gefährdet die moderne Reproduktionsmedizin die menschliche Würde?. in: Um Leben und Tod", pp.266~281 (1990), Frankfurt am Main
- Birnbacher, Dieter, "Menschenwürde - abwägbar oder unabwägbar?. in: Biomedizin und Menschenwürde", pp.249~271 (2004), Frankfurt am Main
- Brownsword, Roger, "What the World Needs Now : Techno-Regulation, Human Rights and Human Dignity. in: Human Rights", pp.203~234 (2004), Oxford
- Dreier, Horst, "Bedeutung und systematische Stellung der Menschenwürde im deutschen Gesetz. in: Menschenwürde als Rechtsbegriff (ARSP-Beiheft Nr. 101)", pp.33~48 (2004), Stuttgart
- Dreier, Horst, "Grundgesetz-Kommentar, Bd. Ⅰ, 2. Auflage" (2004), Tübingen
- Dreier, Horst, "Lebensschutz und Menschenwürde in der bioethischen Diskussion. in: Bioethik und Menschenwürde", pp.9~50 (2002), Münster
- Dreier, Horst, "Menschenwürde aus verfassungsrechtlicher Sicht. in: Marburger Jahrbuch Theologie ⅩⅤⅡ. Menschenwürde", pp.167~210 (2005), Marburg
- Dreier, Horst, "Menschenwürdegaranie und Schwangerschaftsabbruch", pp.1036~1040 (1995), DÖV
- Dreier, Horst, "Stufungen des vorgeburtlichen Lebensschutzes", pp.377~383 (2002), ZRP
- Dürig, Günter, "Der Grundrechtssatz von der Menschenwürde", AöR, 81, pp.117~157 (1956)
- Ernst, Stephan, "Zwischen Prinzipienmoral und Situationsethik. Konfessionelle Unterschiede in der christlichen Bewertung aktueller bioethischer Fragen?. in: Kriterien biomedizinischer Ethik", pp.Wien, Freiburg
- Geddert-Steinacher, "Menschenwürde als Verfassungsbegriff" (1990), Berlin
- Hilgendorf, Eric, "Biostrafrecht als neue Disziplin?. in: Festschrift für Winfried Brohm", pp.387~404 (2002), München
- Hilgendorf, Eric, "Die mißbrauchte Menschenwürde", Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, 7, pp.137~157 (1999)
- Herdegen, Matthias, "Die Menschenwürde im Fluß des bioethischen Diskurses", pp.773~779 (2001), JZ
- Hoerster, Norbert, "Abtreibung im säkularen Staat. Argumente gegen den" (1995), Frankfurt am Main
- Hoerster, Norbert, "Forum: Kompromisslösungen zum Menschenrecht des Embryos auf Leben?", pp.529~532 (2003), JuS
- Hofmann, Hasso, "Die versprochene Menschenwürde", pp.353~377 (1993), AöR
- Hollenbach, Axel, "Grundrechtsschutz im Arzt-Patienten-Verhältnis" (2003), Berlin
- Ipsen, Joern, "Der "verfassungsrechtliche Status" der Embryos in vitro", pp.989~996 (2001), JZ
- Jonas, Hans, "Technik, Medizin und Ethik" (2003), Frankfurt am Main
- Kant, Immanuel, "Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, Neu herausgegeben von Bernd Ludwig, 2. Auflage" (2008), Hamburg
- Kant, Immanuel, "Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Neu herausgegeben von Bernd Ludwig, 3. Auflage" (2009), Hamburg
- Keller, Rolf, "Beginn und Stufungen des strafrechtlichen Lebensschutzes. in: Fortpflanzungsmedizin und Humangenetik - Strafrechtlichen Schranken?, 2. Auflage", pp.111~135 (1991), Tübingen
- Kersten, Jens, "Das Klonen von Menschen" (2004), Tübingen
- Klöpfer, Michael, "Humangentechnik als Verfassungsfrage", pp.417~428 (2002), JZ
- Korff, Wilhelm, "Lexikon der Bioethik, Bd. 1" (2000), Gütersloh
- Luhmann, Niklas, "Grundrechte als Institution, 5. Auflage" (2009), Auflage
- Maunz, Theodor, "Grundgesetz-Kommentar, Bd. 1" (2009), München
- Neumann, Ulfrid, "Die Tyrannei der Würde. Argumentationstheoretische Erwägungen zum Menschenwürdeprinzip", pp.153~166 (1998), ARSP
- Osterlow, Anne, "Biostrafrecht. Eine neue wissenschatliche Teildisziplin" (2004), Berlin
- Singer, Oeter, "Praktische Ethik, 2. Auflage" (2008), Stuttgart