모자보건법 제14조: 개정 필요성과 방향
The Article 14 of Protection of Motherhood Act: What to Rethink and Where to Go
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Many years ago abortion was recognised an individual right by the U.S. Supreme Court. Today it is a public institution. As the Supreme Court observed in the 1992 Casey decision, which reaffirmed Roe v. Wade, a whole world has believed since 1973 in the similar expectation that legal abortion will be available if they want it. Criminal law, however, prescribes harsh criminal penalties for abortion. A prolife doctor's union recently declares that no more silence or hesitation against abortion in clinics would be prevailed. It suddenly attracts public attention on this lament issue. Sometimes the word abortion is unavoidable, as in mass media accounts of the abortion debates, but then it is almost invariably preceded by a line of smarter-sounding words: "the right of a women-to- choose" abortion. Some private and public organizations that administer birth-control programmes and provide abortions, notably Korean Planned Parenthood, are closely tied to government bureaucracies. In truth abortion today is at Korea in the middle of a governmental commitment to controlling its population. The majority of feminists and their allies have stuck onto the ground of "Me Decade" possessive individualism, an ideology that has more in common than it admits with the prehistoric right, which it claims to oppose but has in fact, critic of the pro-choice position comes from his socialist premises. When the legal experts get to the topic of abortion, they again see that it has turned abortion into an "absolute right" on the Korean Constitution. One thing we must have a clear understanding is how Eugenics can be influenced to abortion. Eugenics is the idea that humans are only the sum of inferior and superior. Like F. Galton once projected, "advocating elimination of the lower class through birth control and abortion: you can start immediately to eliminate the barely educated, unhealthy and poor segment of our country."Eugenics was widely popular in the early 20th century, but has largely fallen into disrepute after having become associated with Nazi Germany. Since the postwar period, both the public and the scientific communities have associated eugenics with Nazi abuses, such as enforced racial hygiene, human experimentation, and the extermination of "undesired" population groups. However, developments in genetic, genomic, and reproductive technologies at the end of the 20th century from the basis on eugenic idea have been survived in many areas in the modern era. We can see its backlash in the abortion clauses at article 14 of Protection of Motherhood. It is unclear to anticipate how we can revise it along with the ideology of Constitution: the right to live.
Abstract
Many years ago abortion was recognised an individual right by the U.S. Supreme Court. Today it is a public institution. As the Supreme Court observed in the 1992 Casey decision, which reaffirmed Roe v. Wade, a whole world has believed since 1973 in the similar expectation that legal abortion will be available if they want it. Criminal law, however, prescribes harsh criminal penalties for abortion. A prolife doctor's union recently declares that no more silence or hesitation against abortion in clinics would be prevailed. It suddenly attracts public attention on this lament issue. Sometimes the word abortion is unavoidable, as in mass media accounts of the abortion debates, but then it is almost invariably preceded by a line of smarter-sounding words: "the right of a women-to- choose" abortion. Some private and public organizations that administer birth-control programmes and provide abortions, notably Korean Planned Parenthood, are closely tied to government bureaucracies. In truth abortion today is at Korea in the middle of a governmental commitment to controlling its population. The majority of feminists and their allies have stuck onto the ground of "Me Decade" possessive individualism, an ideology that has more in common than it admits with the prehistoric right, which it claims to oppose but has in fact, critic of the pro-choice position comes from his socialist premises. When the legal experts get to the topic of abortion, they again see that it has turned abortion into an "absolute right" on the Korean Constitution. One thing we must have a clear understanding is how Eugenics can be influenced to abortion. Eugenics is the idea that humans are only the sum of inferior and superior. Like F. Galton once projected, "advocating elimination of the lower class through birth control and abortion: you can start immediately to eliminate the barely educated, unhealthy and poor segment of our country."Eugenics was widely popular in the early 20th century, but has largely fallen into disrepute after having become associated with Nazi Germany. Since the postwar period, both the public and the scientific communities have associated eugenics with Nazi abuses, such as enforced racial hygiene, human experimentation, and the extermination of "undesired" population groups. However, developments in genetic, genomic, and reproductive technologies at the end of the 20th century from the basis on eugenic idea have been survived in many areas in the modern era. We can see its backlash in the abortion clauses at article 14 of Protection of Motherhood. It is unclear to anticipate how we can revise it along with the ideology of Constitution: the right to live.
참고문헌 (29)
- 박은정, "생명공학시대의 법과 윤리" (2000), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 박진빈, "백색국가 건설사: 미국 혁신주의의 빛과 그림자" (2006), 앨피
- 박진빈, "끝나지 않은 이야기 - 미국 우생학 연구", 사양사론, 90 (2006), 한국서양사학회
- 신동일, "우생학과 형사정책" (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 신영전, "식민지 조선에서 우생정책의 전개와 성격: 1930년대 '우생'을 중심으로", 의사학연구, 15(2) (2006), 대한의사학회
- 염운옥, "생명에도 계급이 있는가. 유전자 정치와 영국의 우생학" (2009)
- 이상돈, "형법의 근대성과 대화이론" (1994), 홍문사
- 이인영, "생명의 시작과 죽음. 윤리논쟁과 법 현실" (2009), 삼우사
- Allen, G, "A History of Eugenics in the Class Struggle" (1974), Science for the People
- Appiah, K. A, "Buying Freedom. The Ethics and Economics of Slave Redemption" (2007), Princeton University Press
- Birnbacher, D, "Prinzip der Pietät. Begründung der (begrenzten) Schuztwürdigkeit früher Embryonen", Ethik in der Medizin Bd, 16 (2004)
- Black, E, "War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign a Master Race" (2003), Rour Walls Eight Windows
- Braudel, Fernand, "The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Vol. 1, 2", ~ (2008)
- Deprest, J, "Current Consequences of Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia", J Pediatr Surg, Bd, 41(2) (2006)
- Duttge, G, "Regelungskonzepte zur Spätabtreibung im europäischen Vergleich: Ansätze zur Lösung des Schwangerschaftskonflikts?. in: Spätabbruch der Schwangerschaft. Praktische, ethische und rechtliche Aspekte eines moralischen Konflikts" (2008), Campus Verlag
- European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies Final Activity Report 2002-2003, "EUROCAT", ~ (2003)
- Habermas, "사실성과 타당성. 담론적 법이론과 민주주의적 법치국가 이론" (2000), 나남출판
- Hörster, N, "Abtreibung im säkularen Staat" (1991), Suhkamp
- Kuhn, T, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (1962), Chicago University Press
- Kuhse, H, "Muß dieses Kind am Leben bleiben?" (1993), Das Problem schwerstgeschägter Neugeborener
- Norwick, J.J, "The Middle Sea: A History of the Mediterranean", ~ (2006)
- O'Neill, O, "Trust and Autonomy in Biotechnology" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Popper, K, "Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach" (1979), Claredon Press
- Schneider, H, "Schwangerschaftsabbruch" (2001), pränatale Diagnostik und intrauterine Therapie
- Weikart, R, "From Darwin to Hitler. Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany" (2004), Palgrave
- Wewetzer, C, "Spätabbruch der Schwangerschaft. Praktische, ethische und rechtliche Aspekte eines moralischen Konflikts" (2008), Campus Verlag
- Wiesemann, C, "Von der Verantwortung, ein Kind zu bekommen" (2006), Eines Ethik der Elternschaft
- 薺藤有紀子, "母體保護法" (2003), 明石書店
- 塩野七生, "ルネサンスとは何であつたのか, ルネサンス著作集" (2001), 新湖社