교사와 학생의 의미화 과정에 관한 기호학적 고찰
A Semiotic Approach about the Process of Signification Between Teacher and Learner
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate the significant meaning of the process between teacher and learner. In Semiology, education is the enlarging process of conveying the meaning in the classroom as a field of sign. In that sense, Semiology is not only present a science of interpretation of text, but also means methodology with respect to the understanding of social and cultural phenomenon. It is the hermeneutics activity to student, which enables them to learn from the teacher and the text. It means students don't just take the meanings itself in direct way, but rather in translating way as their own meaning of the structures. Similarly, we can say that teachers don't convey the meaning directly to students. They instead translate the meanings for students, allowing them to represent their own individual understanding of the structures. It can be said that the teaching and learning process is the relationships of hermeneutic cycle. The meaning of text and the pre-understanding of interpreter constitute the situation of interpretation. So, we can say that the teaching-learning process is of the message interpretation in regards to curriculum knowledge. In Semiotic point of view, educational texts are not just merely the tools for transmitting the information. We can also recognize the educational texts as the dynamic products of the meaningful actions between two educational agents. These kinds of Semiotic views can direct us to the new vision to clarify the educational communication between teachers and students in the classroom.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the significant meaning of the process between teacher and learner. In Semiology, education is the enlarging process of conveying the meaning in the classroom as a field of sign. In that sense, Semiology is not only present a science of interpretation of text, but also means methodology with respect to the understanding of social and cultural phenomenon. It is the hermeneutics activity to student, which enables them to learn from the teacher and the text. It means students don't just take the meanings itself in direct way, but rather in translating way as their own meaning of the structures. Similarly, we can say that teachers don't convey the meaning directly to students. They instead translate the meanings for students, allowing them to represent their own individual understanding of the structures. It can be said that the teaching and learning process is the relationships of hermeneutic cycle. The meaning of text and the pre-understanding of interpreter constitute the situation of interpretation. So, we can say that the teaching-learning process is of the message interpretation in regards to curriculum knowledge. In Semiotic point of view, educational texts are not just merely the tools for transmitting the information. We can also recognize the educational texts as the dynamic products of the meaningful actions between two educational agents. These kinds of Semiotic views can direct us to the new vision to clarify the educational communication between teachers and students in the classroom.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김경용, "기호학이란 무엇인가" (1997), 민음사
- 김봉석, "교육의 과정의 해석학적 재개념화", 교육과정연구, 25(4), pp.61~80 (2007), 한국교육과정학회
- 김성도, "현대기호학 강의" (1998), 민음사
- 김의수, "딜타이 해석학적 철학과 형이상학", 철학연구, 21, pp.27~45 (1986)
- 박민정, "포스트모더니즘 담론과 교육과정 논의의 쟁점", 교육과정연구, 23(4), pp.37~57 (2005), 한국교육과정학회
- 박이문, "자연,인간,언어" (1998), 철학과현실사
- 소두영, "상징의 과학기호학" (1993), 인간사랑
- 손승남, "Herbart의 교육학적 박자에 관한 해석학적 고찰", 교육학연구, 39(2), pp.45~62 (2001)
- 신항식, "롤랑 바르트의 기호학:기호의 윤리에 관하여" (2003), 문학과경제사
- 윤병희, "인간의 유한성과 교육의 가능성-철학적 해석학과 교육의 관련성을 중심으로", 교육과정연구, 20(4), pp.1~21 (2002), 한국교육과정학회
- 이두원, "찰스 퍼스의 커뮤니케이션 사상에 대한 연구", 기호학연구, 3, pp.432~454 (1997)
- 이찬주, "표현적 교육목표의 성격과 그 교육적 과정에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1999
- 이화봉, "언어기호의 근원적 자의성과 이원적 대립", 이화여자대학교 연구논집, 16, pp.96~108 (1988)
- 이휘자, "기호의 성격에 관한 고찰", 인문논총, 9(1), pp.145~157 (1998), 아주대학교 인문과학연구소
- 임병덕, "교육방법으로서의 간접전달" (1995), 교육과학사
- 정범모, "교육과 교육학" (1978), 배영사
- 최명선, "교육적 체험의 존재론적 의미", 교육학연구, 36(1), pp.19~35 (1998)
- 최용호, "언어학과 정신분석학소쉬르에서 라캉으로, 라캉에서 소쉬르로 - 시니피앙에 관하여", 불어불문학연구, 55(55), pp.808~845 (2003), 한국불어불문학회
- 최종인, "교육학적 차원에서의 경험의 문제", 교육철학, 19, pp.39~56 (1998)
- 한국기호학회, "삶과 기호" (1997), 문학과지성사
- 한국기호학회, "기호와 해석" (1998), 문학과지성사
- 한국기호학회, "문화와 기호" (1995), 문학과지성사
- Atkinsk,E., "Reframing curriculum theory in terms of interpretation and practice: A hermeneutic approach", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(1), pp.437~448 (1988)
- Kvale,S., "The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding", The Journal of Phenomenolgical Psychology, 14(2), pp.171~196 (1983)
- Macdonald,J.B., "Theory-practice and the hermeneutic circle In Contemporary curriculum discourse", pp.101~113 (1988), GorsuchScarisbrick, Publishers
- Peirce,C.S., "Semiotic and Significs" (1977), Indiana University Press
- Peirce,C.S., "Handbook of Semiotics" (1990), The M.I.T. Press
- Schubert,W., "Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility" (1986), Macmillan