학교 교육 현실과 교사의 철학
Teachers' Educational Situation in School and Their Philosophy of Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at examining, from the perspective of teacher, the reason of why educational philosophy does not have relevance to current educational situation, and discussing about the reasons of why teachers need philosophy of education, and suggesting a way of how philosophy of education can attain relevance to educational situation. The research points out that a fundamental reason of why philosophy of education disconnected with educational situation is the fact that teachers are alienated from decision making on educational matter which they perform everyday. Every teacher needs his/her own philosophy of education. Because it contributes distinctively for teachers to change educational situation in right direction and to practice their educational works with a holistic understanding of education. This study suggests the idea of “situated philosophy” and “educational philosophy by teachers” to realize a healthy and desirable philosophy of education. It is for reciprocal benefit and growth both of philosophers of education and educators to pursue a relevant philosophy of education. It is almost impossible for teachers to reflect on educational matters with their own educational philosophy, because they are alienated from the process of policy making on their educational problems in the current educational situation. Therefore, it is necessary that philosophers listen to what teachers say about their situation and tries to communicate with teachers on educational matters in order for educational philosophy to regain its audience.
Abstract
This study aims at examining, from the perspective of teacher, the reason of why educational philosophy does not have relevance to current educational situation, and discussing about the reasons of why teachers need philosophy of education, and suggesting a way of how philosophy of education can attain relevance to educational situation. The research points out that a fundamental reason of why philosophy of education disconnected with educational situation is the fact that teachers are alienated from decision making on educational matter which they perform everyday. Every teacher needs his/her own philosophy of education. Because it contributes distinctively for teachers to change educational situation in right direction and to practice their educational works with a holistic understanding of education. This study suggests the idea of “situated philosophy” and “educational philosophy by teachers” to realize a healthy and desirable philosophy of education. It is for reciprocal benefit and growth both of philosophers of education and educators to pursue a relevant philosophy of education. It is almost impossible for teachers to reflect on educational matters with their own educational philosophy, because they are alienated from the process of policy making on their educational problems in the current educational situation. Therefore, it is necessary that philosophers listen to what teachers say about their situation and tries to communicate with teachers on educational matters in order for educational philosophy to regain its audience.
참고문헌 (22)
- 권동택, "한국 초등교육개혁의 기본 전제와 과제", 비교교육연구, 15(1), pp.1~22 (2005), 한국비교교육학회
- 김창환, "한국교육철학의 학문적 정체성", 교육철학연구, (33), pp.7~22 (2005), 한국교육철학학회
- 김현주, "교육철학의 성격과 역할: 실천철학을 지향하며", 교육철학연구, (41), pp.93~118 (2008), 한국교육철학학회
- 신득렬, "현대교육철학" (2003), 학지사
- 양은주, "교육철학의 ‘교사’ 연구동향과 과제", 교육철학연구, (33), pp.63~82 (2005), 한국교육철학학회
- 이병승, "교육철학에 대한 몇 가지 편견들", 교육연구, 20, pp.1~16 (2006), 공주대학교 교육연구소
- 임현식, "한국 초등학교 열린 교육 개혁의 정당성에 대한 교육철학적 고찰", 열린교육연구, 11(2), pp.45~68 (2003), 한국열린교육학회
- 조난심, "교육철학의 정체성과 학교교육", 교육철학연구, (31), pp.169~184 (2004), 한국교육철학학회
- 조성익, "교원 업무 경감 및 학교 업무 효율화에 대한 연구(교육유관기관보고서)" (2000), 도봉정보산업고등학교
- Arcilla,Rene Vincente, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to Each Other", Educational Theory, 52(1), pp.1~11 (2002)
- Arnstine,Donald G., "Why Should Philosophers and Educators Speak to Each Other?: There are more serious problems to face and more important jobs to be done", Educational Theory, 52(3), pp.303~313 (2002)
- Ball,Stephen J., "Foucault and Education: discipline and knowledge" (2007), 청계출판사
- Bonnett, Michael, "Primary Teaching: What has philosophy to offer", Cambridge Journal of Education, 20(2) (1990)
- Bredo,Eric, "How Can Philosophy of Education Be Both Viable and Good", Educational Theory, 52(3), pp.263~271 (2002)
- Burbules,Nicholas C., "The Dilemma of Philosophy of Education: “Relevance” or Critique? Part Two", Educational Theory, 52(3), pp.349~357 (2002)
- Bushweller,Kevin, "Must Schools Be Parents, Too", Education Digest, 61(9) (1996)
- Dewey,John, "Democracy and Education: An Introduction of the Philosophy of Education" (1989), 교육과학사
- Ellett,Frederick S.Jr, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to Each Other?: Some reasons for hope", Educational Theory, 52(3), pp.315~325 (2002)
- Fenstermacher,Gary G., "Should Philosophers and Educators Be Speaking to Each Other", Educational Theory, 52(3), pp.339~348 (2002)
- Griffith,Morwenna, "Why Teachers and Philosophers Need Each Other: Philosophy and educational research", Cambridge Journal of Education, 27(2) (1997)
- Mason,Mark, "Teachers as Critical Mediators of Knowledge", Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(2), pp.343~352 (2000)
- Stengel,Barbara S., "Cause For Worry or Agenda for Action", Educational Theory, 52(3), pp.281~290 (2002)