도덕적 책임과 본래성 교육
Moral Responsibility and the Education for Authenticity
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to explore the means of cultivating pupil's moral responsibility. There are continuous debates between free will theory and determinism. Determinism is the view that all events, including everything that we do, are causal upshots of the distant past and the laws of nature. According to this account, we have not responsibilities for our actions. In contrast, free will theory is the view that we have free will that we can choose and decide our actions. Because of our free will, we should be morally responsible for our actions. Incompatiblists argue that free will is not compatible with determinism. In contrast, Compatiblists argue that free will is compatible with determinism. Latter implies many educational ideas. In this perspective, to be free means being the causal source of one's actions and being able to act on reason. There are various educational theories that argue for the importance of authenticity. Authenticity is variously construed as the capacity to make rational choices about what codes of conduct to adopt, the capacity to feel, will, think, and see in particular ways, the capacity to be the best juge of one's vital interests and needs, the capacity to exercise liberty rights, and the capacity for self-determination. Education for responsibility-relative authenticity is required. Free will is a necessary condition for moral responsibility and it should also be seen as compatible with determinism.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the means of cultivating pupil's moral responsibility. There are continuous debates between free will theory and determinism. Determinism is the view that all events, including everything that we do, are causal upshots of the distant past and the laws of nature. According to this account, we have not responsibilities for our actions. In contrast, free will theory is the view that we have free will that we can choose and decide our actions. Because of our free will, we should be morally responsible for our actions. Incompatiblists argue that free will is not compatible with determinism. In contrast, Compatiblists argue that free will is compatible with determinism. Latter implies many educational ideas. In this perspective, to be free means being the causal source of one's actions and being able to act on reason. There are various educational theories that argue for the importance of authenticity. Authenticity is variously construed as the capacity to make rational choices about what codes of conduct to adopt, the capacity to feel, will, think, and see in particular ways, the capacity to be the best juge of one's vital interests and needs, the capacity to exercise liberty rights, and the capacity for self-determination. Education for responsibility-relative authenticity is required. Free will is a necessary condition for moral responsibility and it should also be seen as compatible with determinism.
참고문헌 (17)
- 강영안, "도덕은 무엇으로부터 오는가 : 칸트의 도덕철학" (2002), 소나무
- 구인회, "행위와 도덕적 책임에 관한 고찰", 철학연구, 47, pp.357~375 (1999), 철학연구회
- 김영래, "칸트의 교육이론" (2003), 학지사
- 김희봉, "선호주의적 잘삶과 본래성 교육", 교육철학연구, 33(2), pp.31~52 (2011), 한국교육철학학회
- 변순용, "책임의 윤리학" (2007), 철학과 현실사
- 서용석, "‘Authenticity’ 개념에 관한 교육학적 일고찰: 하이데거의 ‘죽음과 탄생’의 교육론", 교육철학연구, 33(3), pp.49~72 (2011), 한국교육철학학회
- 안건훈, "자유의지는 도덕적인 책임의 필요조건인가?", 동서철학연구, (28), pp.225~246 (2003), 한국동서철학회
- 이명숙, "결정론과 도덕적 책임의 양립 가능성", 범한철학, 36(1), pp.155~179 (2005), 범한철학회
- 한자경, "자아의 연구" (1997), 서광사
- Bonnett, M., "Autonomy and Authenticity in Education, In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education" (2003), Blackwell Publishing
- Cuypers, S. E., "Educating for Authenticity: The Paradox of Moral Education Revisited, In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education", pp.122~144 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Cuypers, S. E., "Authentic Education and Moral Responsibility", Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(1), pp.78~94 (2007)
- Giesinger, J., "Free Will and Education", Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44(4), pp.515~528 (2010)
- Haji, I., "Moral Responsibility, Authenticity and Education" (2007), Routledge
- Haji, I., "Authenticity-Sensitive Preferentism and Educating for Well-being and Autonomy", Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(1), pp.85~106 (2008)
- Strawson, G., "The Bounds of Freedom, In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will", pp.441~460 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Taylor, P. W., "Principles of Ethics" (1975), 서광사