2009 개정 중학교 과학 교과서 생명과학 단원에 나타난 과학의 본성 분석
Analysis of the Presentation for the Nature of Science in Life Science Chapters ofthe 2009 Revised Middle School Science Textbooks
1
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this study was to study the presentation of the nature of science (NOS) in the life science chapters of the 2009 revised middle school science textbooks. The study adopted the four themes of the nature of science as a conceptual framework: (a) nature of scientific knowledge, (b) nature of scientific inquiry, (c) nature of scientific thinking, and (d) nature of the interactions among science, technology, and society (Lee, 2013). The reliability was measured between two coders by percentage agreement as well as the Cohen’s kappa (κ) and resulted in 96% and .96, which means the results of analysis was consistent and reliable. The findings of this analysis were as follows. First, overall presentation of the four themes of nature of science in the middle school science textbooks show that while the nature of scientific knowledge (theme Ⅰ) has been emphasized greatly on the textbooks devoting the contents over 60%, the nature of interaction among science, technology and society (STS; theme Ⅳ) was little focused with the portion of less than 5% in most of the middle school science textbooks. Second, the pattern of presentation of the four themes of nature of science was similarly shown as theme Ⅰ > theme Ⅱ > theme Ⅲ > theme Ⅳ across the grade levels, chapter titles, and the publishing companies. This means that the middle school science textbooks attempt to convey the view of nature of science as a scientific knowledge in the most contents of textbooks.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to study the presentation of the nature of science (NOS) in the life science chapters of the 2009 revised middle school science textbooks. The study adopted the four themes of the nature of science as a conceptual framework: (a) nature of scientific knowledge, (b) nature of scientific inquiry, (c) nature of scientific thinking, and (d) nature of the interactions among science, technology, and society (Lee, 2013). The reliability was measured between two coders by percentage agreement as well as the Cohen’s kappa (κ) and resulted in 96% and .96, which means the results of analysis was consistent and reliable. The findings of this analysis were as follows. First, overall presentation of the four themes of nature of science in the middle school science textbooks show that while the nature of scientific knowledge (theme Ⅰ) has been emphasized greatly on the textbooks devoting the contents over 60%, the nature of interaction among science, technology and society (STS; theme Ⅳ) was little focused with the portion of less than 5% in most of the middle school science textbooks. Second, the pattern of presentation of the four themes of nature of science was similarly shown as theme Ⅰ > theme Ⅱ > theme Ⅲ > theme Ⅳ across the grade levels, chapter titles, and the publishing companies. This means that the middle school science textbooks attempt to convey the view of nature of science as a scientific knowledge in the most contents of textbooks.
참고문헌 (30)
- 교육과학기술부, "과학과 교육과정", 교육과학기술부 고시 제2009-42호(별책9), ~ (2009)
- 권계현, "우리나라와 미국 초등 과학 교과서의 천문 영역 내용 비교 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(2), pp.166~185 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김지혜, "한국, 일본, 미국의 초등 과학 교과서에 반영된 과학의 본성 내용 분석", 석사, 생물교육, pp.2011
- 김진화, "첨단 과학에 대한 초등 교사와 학생의 인식 및 교과서 내용 분석", 초등과학교육, 28(4), pp.390~403 (2009), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김하나, "2009 개정 교육과정 중학교 〈과학1〉 교과서에 제시된 '과학 글쓰기' 활동 연구", 석사, 공통과학교육전공, pp.2013
- 이미경, "과학적 소양에 근거한 제 7차 중학교 과학 교과서의 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(4), pp.601~609 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 서예원, "한국과 미국의 초등학교 과학 교과서 비교 연구: 3학년 물질 영역의 과학적 개념 및 탐구 과정을 중심으로", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.509~524 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 서예원, "한국과 미국의 초등 과학 교육과정 지구영역의 학년 간 내용 연계성 분석 연구", 초등과학교육, 27(4), pp.356~370 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 여상인, "한국과 미국 BSCS 초등 과학 교과서의 삽화 비교", 초등과학교육, 26(4), pp.459~467 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이영희, "질적 연구에 의한 고등학교 생명과학Ⅰ 교과서 생명과학의 이해 단원에 내포된 과학의 본성 분석", 교과교육학연구, 17(1), pp.173~197 (2013), 교과교육연구소
- 이영희, "Comparative Analysis of the Presentation of the Nature of Science (NOS) in Korea and US Elementary Science Textbooks", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(3), pp.207~212 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 이영희, "초등 과학 교과서에 나타난 과학의 본성에 대한 분석 - 4가지 영역의 과학적 소양을 기준으로 -", 초등과학교육, 33(2), pp.207~216 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 정덕임, "중학교 과학 교과서 생명 영역에 나타난 과학적 소양 분석", 석사, 생물교육전공, pp.2013
- 정충덕, "한국과 미국 초등학교 과학 교과서 삽화 비교 연구: 3 - 6학년 생명영역을 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 27(7), pp.642~647 (2007), 한국과학교육학회
- 한영욱, "귀국학생 지도를 위한 미국과 한국의 초등 과학과 교과서 내용 분석", 초등과학교육, 21(1), pp.1~11 (2002), 한국초등과학교육학회
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (AAAS), "Project 2061: Science for all Americans" (1990), Oxford University Press
- American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS), "Benchmarks for Science Literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Chiappetta, E. L., "A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), pp.713~725 (1991)
- Chiappetta, E. L., "Examination of science textbooks published over the past 100 years in the United States", Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching meeting. San Francisco, CA (2006)
- Chiappetta, E. L., "Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science", International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), pp.1847~1868 (2007)
- Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, "Common Framework of Science Learning Outcomes K-12" (1997), Toronto, Ontario
- Review of the National Curriculum in England, "Department for Education", ~, pp.Research Report DFE-RR178-2012 (2012)
- Hammerich, P. L., "The Nature of Science in Science Education", pp.127~136 (1998), Kluwer Academic publishers
- Lederman, N. G., "Student' and teachers' conception about the nature of science : A review of the research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.331~359 (1992)
- 이영희, "A Proposal of Inclusive Framework of the Nature of Science (NOS) Based on the 4 Themes of Scientific Literacy for K-12 School Science", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(3), pp.553~568 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- McComas, W. F., "The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies", pp.3~39 (1998), Kluwer
- Meichtry, Y. J., "Influencing student understanding of the nature of science : Data from a case of curriculum development", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.389~407 (1992)
- National Research Council, "National Science Education Standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- National Research Council, "The Next Generation Science Standards" (2013), National Academy Press
- The New Zealand Ministry of Education, "The New Zealand Curriculum" (2014), the Ministry of Education