본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등 예비교사들의 과학 교과서 삽화를 해석하는 관점 분석

An Analysis of Elementary Pre-service Teachers’Analytic Perspectives on Illustrationsin the Science Textbook

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study analyzed elementary pre-service teachers’ analytic perspectives on illustrations in the science textbook, particularly in direct/indirect and emotional cognitive domains of illustrations according to the 4-field matrix, and examined their understanding of the functions of textbook illustrations. As research subjects, this study selected 140 elementary pre-service teachers who were in the third year of school at a university of education. Based on the research results, this study came to the following conclusions. Firstly, as a result of analyzing the elementary pre-service teachers’ perspectives on the illustration of a water striders according to the 4-field matrix, this study found out that they showed the highest frequency of observing the direct/ cognitive domains, while showing the lowest frequency of observing the indirect/emotional domains. Then, this study examined the order of observing the direct/cognitive domains, it was found that they started observing distinctive and noticeable parts of the illustration and moved on to the surroundings. Secondly, as a result of analyzing their descriptions about the functions of illustrations, this study found out that some of them regarded illustrations with decorative functions as simple and meaningless illustrations or empty space-filled illustrations, but few of them clearly stated the decorative function. For the illustrative function of illustrations, most of the pre-service teachers said that it was to help understand the relevant text, and only 6 of them clearly stated the illustrative function. For the explanatory function of illustration, 14 of the pre-service teachers regarded it to explain an experimental process in detail. For the complementary function of illustrations, 16 of them clearly mentioned it to explain with pictures something that was not in the text.

Abstract

This study analyzed elementary pre-service teachers’ analytic perspectives on illustrations in the science textbook, particularly in direct/indirect and emotional cognitive domains of illustrations according to the 4-field matrix, and examined their understanding of the functions of textbook illustrations. As research subjects, this study selected 140 elementary pre-service teachers who were in the third year of school at a university of education. Based on the research results, this study came to the following conclusions. Firstly, as a result of analyzing the elementary pre-service teachers’ perspectives on the illustration of a water striders according to the 4-field matrix, this study found out that they showed the highest frequency of observing the direct/ cognitive domains, while showing the lowest frequency of observing the indirect/emotional domains. Then, this study examined the order of observing the direct/cognitive domains, it was found that they started observing distinctive and noticeable parts of the illustration and moved on to the surroundings. Secondly, as a result of analyzing their descriptions about the functions of illustrations, this study found out that some of them regarded illustrations with decorative functions as simple and meaningless illustrations or empty space-filled illustrations, but few of them clearly stated the decorative function. For the illustrative function of illustrations, most of the pre-service teachers said that it was to help understand the relevant text, and only 6 of them clearly stated the illustrative function. For the explanatory function of illustration, 14 of the pre-service teachers regarded it to explain an experimental process in detail. For the complementary function of illustrations, 16 of them clearly mentioned it to explain with pictures something that was not in the text.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Choi, A., "Analysis of illustration and reading materials resented in middle school science textbook physics chapter on the 2009 revised curriculum", Master, pp.2014
  2. 정충덕, "한국과 미국 초등학교 과학 교과서 삽화 비교 연구: 3 - 6학년 생명영역을 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 27(7), pp.642~647 (2007), 한국과학교육학회
  3. Eco, U., "Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language" (1984), Indiana University Press
  4. 장기범, "과학 교과서 삽화 제시방식에 따른 초등학교 학생들의 이해도 및 안구운동 분석", 한국초등교육, 24(4), pp.147~166 (2013), 초등교육연구원
  5. 강상, "Sandler의 그림읽기 절차에 따라 풍속화를 활용한 과학교육이 유아의 과학적 능력에 미치는 효과", 어린이문학교육연구, 14(3), pp.137~155 (2013), 한국어린이문학교육학회
  6. Kapyla, M., "A phenomenogical view of pictures in teaching and a novel method of analysing them", Nordic Studies in Science Education, 10(2), pp.231~242 (2014)
  7. 이형철, "한,일 초등학교 과학 교과서 삽화 비교 연구", 초등과학교육, 24(2), pp.138~144 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
  8. Ministry of Education., "Science 3-1 Teacher's Guidebook" (2014), Ministry of Education
  9. 노태희, "7차 초등학교 과학 교과서의 삽화에 나타난 성역할 고정 관념 분석", 초등과학교육, 23(1), pp.85~91 (2004), 한국초등과학교육학회
  10. Pozzer, L. L., "Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), pp.1089~1114 (2003)
  11. Reid, D. J., "Pupils’ perception of biological pictures and its implications for readability studies of biology textbooks", Journal of Biological Education, 14(1), pp.59~69 (1980)
  12. Roth, W. M., "Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), pp.977~019 (1999)
  13. 신명경, "수업 전과 후에 나타나는 학생들의 과학 교과서 삽화에 대한 연상과 학습목표 진술 비교 - 2007 개정 5학년 과학 지구와 우주 영역 -", 초등과학교육, 32(4), pp.545~556 (2013), 한국초등과학교육학회
  14. 양일호, "초등학생들은 과학 교과서에 나오는 삽화를 어떻게 이해하고 있을까?", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.475~488 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
  15. 여상인, "한국과 미국 BSCS 초등 과학 교과서의 삽화 비교", 초등과학교육, 26(4), pp.459~467 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)