1920년대 중반 근대 교육 수혜자의 어문생활사 ― 전주신흥학교 유학생의 일기 자료를 중심으로 ―
A life history of Korean language of A Modern Educatee in the Mid 1920s ‒ Focus on a diary document of a student in Jeonju Sinheung school ‒
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper describes the characteristics on the life history of Korean language of a student who received modern education in the mid-1920s. It is based on a diary written by a student lived in Muju province and studied at Jeonju Sinheung School in 1924. The writer of the diary received primary education for about six years from 1918 to 1923. When he was studying in Jeonju in 1924, he was exposed to various regional language norms while interacting with speakers from different regions. The language norm used in the dairy was ‘Eonmun Cheoljabeop’ which was made in 1921 under the Japanese occupation era. However, in the diary we found that the writer had lived according to traditional writing practices rather than the two writing rules. This exemplifies the fact that education for Joseon language was not organized in school education at that time. In this diary, it is reflected various phenomena of Muju dialects. The writer showed an attitude to modify his local dialects’ phonological phenomena, which seemed to be over-corrected. Nevertheless, there was no indication for a correction on the phenomenon of front vowelizing under the sound of friction. This indicates that he might consider its phenomenon as a trans-regional norm which was regarded among intellectuals at that time. He studied in Japanese at school, but used Korean language when he write a diary. The school he attended was teaching him to cultivate faith and ethnic spirit. It influenced him to write a dairy in his mother language not in Japanese. Even though he did not receive systematic spelling education, he made efforts to match its notation and pronunciation with his own heart. This paper is a case study that describes the Korean language life in the mid-1920s. Hopefully, the history of Korean language life will be filled the gaps through inductive researches including this one.
Abstract
This paper describes the characteristics on the life history of Korean language of a student who received modern education in the mid-1920s. It is based on a diary written by a student lived in Muju province and studied at Jeonju Sinheung School in 1924. The writer of the diary received primary education for about six years from 1918 to 1923. When he was studying in Jeonju in 1924, he was exposed to various regional language norms while interacting with speakers from different regions. The language norm used in the dairy was ‘Eonmun Cheoljabeop’ which was made in 1921 under the Japanese occupation era. However, in the diary we found that the writer had lived according to traditional writing practices rather than the two writing rules. This exemplifies the fact that education for Joseon language was not organized in school education at that time. In this diary, it is reflected various phenomena of Muju dialects. The writer showed an attitude to modify his local dialects’ phonological phenomena, which seemed to be over-corrected. Nevertheless, there was no indication for a correction on the phenomenon of front vowelizing under the sound of friction. This indicates that he might consider its phenomenon as a trans-regional norm which was regarded among intellectuals at that time. He studied in Japanese at school, but used Korean language when he write a diary. The school he attended was teaching him to cultivate faith and ethnic spirit. It influenced him to write a dairy in his mother language not in Japanese. Even though he did not receive systematic spelling education, he made efforts to match its notation and pronunciation with his own heart. This paper is a case study that describes the Korean language life in the mid-1920s. Hopefully, the history of Korean language life will be filled the gaps through inductive researches including this one.
참고문헌 (27)
- 곽차섭, "미시사-줌렌즈로 당겨본 역사", 역사비평, (46) (1999), 역사비평사
- 곽차섭, "2세대 미시사: '사회'에서 '문화'로", 역사와 문화, (23), pp.3~27 (2012), 문화사학회[DOI]
- 곽차섭, "일기 연구의 이론과 실제 -서양의 경우를 중심으로", 코기토, 85, pp.113~142 (2018), 인문학연구소[DOI]
- 구본관, "국어생활사 교육 내용", 문법 교육, 10, pp.1~48 (2009), 한국문법교육학회
- 김은성, "국어 어문생활사 기술을 위한 시론- 자료 수집 및 분류 체계화 방안을 중심으로", 국어교육연구, (19), pp.439~470 (2007), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 김규남, "생애사 기록물 「冊平日記」와 「月波遺稿」에 나타난 정체성과 언어 의식", 방언학, (13), pp.25~60 (2011), 한국방언학회
- 김규남, "과도교정과 위신 표기의 사회언어학적 이해 -개인기록 『창평일기』 1차 입력본을 중심으로-", 방언학, (15), pp.257~285 (2012), 한국방언학회[DOI]
- 김규남, "위신표기 추이와 사회적 변수의 상관성 연구 - 개인기록 ≪창평일기≫ 26년의 기록을 중심으로 -", 방언학, (17), pp.201~228 (2013), 한국방언학회
- 김유범, "국어생활사 교육의 방법과 교재", 문법 교육, 10, pp.49~64 (2009), 한국문법교육학회
- 백두현, "조선 시대 여성의 문자 생활 연구― 조선왕조실록 및 한글 필사본을 중심으로 ―", 진단학보, (97), pp.139~187 (2004), 진단학회
- 백두현, "국어사 연구의 새로운 방향 설정을 위하여", 國語學, (47), pp.3~38 (2006), 국어학회
- 백두현, "어문생활사로 본 언간과 한글고문서의 연구 방법", 국어사연구, (10), pp.41~72 (2010), 국어사학회
- 우인수, "조선시대 생활사 연구의 현황과 과제", 역사교육논닙, 23-24 (1999), 역사교육학회
- 이장희, "어문생활사 연구의 현황과 과제", 영남학, (13), pp.333~367 (2008), 영남문화연구원[DOI]
- 이철기, "문자생활사 교육의 의의와 내용 연구", 우리어문연구, (55), pp.523~553 (2016), 우리어문학회[DOI]
- 장윤희, "국어생활사의 관점에서 본 문학 작품의 가치", 국어국문학, 141, pp.107~132 (2005), 국어국문학회
- 정수희, "개화기 국어의 표기와 음운체계 : 신소설을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2012
- 정연식, "한국 생활사 연구의 현황과 과제 - 조선시대 생활사 연구를 중심으로 -", 역사와 현실, (72), pp.289~314 (2009), 한국역사연구회
- 조동일, "어문생활사로 나아가는 열린 시야", 관악어문연구, 28 (2003), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 조태린, "국어생활사 연구의 사회언어학적 요소", 문법 교육, 10, pp.347~368 (2009), 한국문법교육학회
- 최용기, "일제강점기의 국어정책", 한국어문학연구, 46 (2006)
- 최전승, "19세기 후기 전라방언의 음운현상과 그 역사성" (1987), 한신문화사
- 홍성덕, "국역 전주부사" (2008), 전주시⋅전부부사번역편찬위원회
- 홍윤표, "기획논문:한글 고문서의 연구 현황과 과제", 영남학, 10 (2006), 경북대학교 영남문화연구원
- 홍윤표, "세계 속의 한글" (2008), 박이정
- 허재영, "일제강점기 조선총독부의 교과서 정책과 교과서 편찬 실태", 동양학, (46), pp.43~64 (2009), 동양학연구원[DOI]
- 허재영, "어문생활사 연구 대상과 방법", 우리말글, 42, pp.135~153 (2008), 우리말글학회
