토마스 아퀴나스의 윤리교설의 구조와 방법은 아리스토텔레스적인가?
Is the structure and method of Thomas Aquinas’s ethical theory Aristotelian?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
On the discussion that how Thomas Aquinas appropriates or transforms theory in Aristotelian ethical theory. There have been two different allegations between the scholars. One is a philosophical elucidation. It is the averment that Thomas Aquinas appropriates or transforms Aristotle’s theory on the purely Aristotle’s philosophical basis by trying to reveal clearly and to develop Aristotle’s primary intention. The other is a theological elucidation. It is the averment that Thomas Aquinas’s exposition translations theologically Aristotelian ethical theory by elucidating Aristotle’s theories. AS for this, Here I review structure and method in the philosophical appropriation or transformation of Aristotelian ethical theory by Thomas Aquinas. From this point of view, parts and a whole as relation between secondary virtues and basic virtues, power and virtue as a method of analogy, the principles as a solution of difficulties. In conclusion, Aristotle’s ethics does not consider unnecessary commitments in natural philosophy or metaphysics, even at the cost, apparently, of leaving certain nagging difficulties unresolved. In the matter we have considered, Thomas Aquinas develops Aristotle’s ethical theory in the EN by resolving difficulties inherent in the EN, drawing on principles taken from Aristotle’s natural philosophy and metaphysics to do so. Thomas Aquinas’s virtue ethics, through its broad reliance on Aristotelian philosophy, has a clever, deep, and compelling rational structure.
Abstract
On the discussion that how Thomas Aquinas appropriates or transforms theory in Aristotelian ethical theory. There have been two different allegations between the scholars. One is a philosophical elucidation. It is the averment that Thomas Aquinas appropriates or transforms Aristotle’s theory on the purely Aristotle’s philosophical basis by trying to reveal clearly and to develop Aristotle’s primary intention. The other is a theological elucidation. It is the averment that Thomas Aquinas’s exposition translations theologically Aristotelian ethical theory by elucidating Aristotle’s theories. AS for this, Here I review structure and method in the philosophical appropriation or transformation of Aristotelian ethical theory by Thomas Aquinas. From this point of view, parts and a whole as relation between secondary virtues and basic virtues, power and virtue as a method of analogy, the principles as a solution of difficulties. In conclusion, Aristotle’s ethics does not consider unnecessary commitments in natural philosophy or metaphysics, even at the cost, apparently, of leaving certain nagging difficulties unresolved. In the matter we have considered, Thomas Aquinas develops Aristotle’s ethical theory in the EN by resolving difficulties inherent in the EN, drawing on principles taken from Aristotle’s natural philosophy and metaphysics to do so. Thomas Aquinas’s virtue ethics, through its broad reliance on Aristotelian philosophy, has a clever, deep, and compelling rational structure.
참고문헌 (24)
- 박승찬, "서양 중세의 아리스토텔레스 수용사" (2010), 누멘
- 손은실, "토마스 아퀴나스의 아리스토텔레스 주석－『니코마코스 윤리학 주석』을 중심으로", 서양고전학연구, (28), pp.173~198 (2007), 한국서양고전학회
- 김진성, "명제에 관하여" (2008), 이제이북스
- 코플스톤, F. C., "중세철학사: 아우구스티누스에서 스코투스까지" (1988), 서광사
- Barnes, J., "Aristotle and the Methods of ethics", Revue Internationale de la philosophie, 34 (1981)
- Bradley, D. J. M., "Aquiunas on the twofold human good: reason and human happiness in Aquinas’s moral science" (1997)
- Bostock, D., "Aristotle’s Ethics", pp.10~ (2000), Oxford University Press
- DeYoung, R. K., "Aquinas’s Ethics: Metaphysical Foundations, Moral Theory, and Theological Context" (2009), University of Notre Dame Press
- Dumas, Marie-Noëlle, "La Definition de la prudens chez Thomas d’Aquin et ses relation avec la definitio d’Aristote", Bulletin du cercle thomiste, Caen, (2) (1978)
- Elders, L., "Autour de saint Thomas d’Aquin: recueil d’études sur sa pensée philosophique et théologique" (1987), FAC Taber, Paris Brugge
- Elders, L., "Saint Thomas d’ Aquin et Aristote", Revue thomiste, 96 (1998)
- Gauthier R. A., "Introduction, Traduction et Commentaire" (1958), Publications universitsires
- Jaffa, H. V., "Thomism and Aristotelianism: A Study of the Commentary by Thomas Aquinas on the Nicomachean Ethics" (1952), The University of Chicago Press
- Jordon, M. D, "The Gilson Lectures on Thomas Aquinas" (2008), Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies
- Jordon, M. D., "God and the Philosophy of Abraham. Essay in Memory of James A. Weisheipl O. P." (1991)
- Kleber, "Glück als Lebenziel: Untersuchungen zur philosophie des Glücks bei Thomas von Aquin" (1988), Aschendorff, Münster
- Kraut, R., "The Standford Encyciopedia of Philosophy" (2012), Stanford University
- Macdonald, Scott, "Christian Theism and the Problem of Philosophy" (1990), University of Notre Dame Press
- Nussbaum, M., "The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Pakaluk, M., "Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics,: A Critical Guide" (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Thomas Aquinas, "Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics" (1993), Dumb Ox Books
- Thomas Aquinas, "Quaestiones disputatae, Vol. 2" (1965), Marietti
- Thomas Aquinas, "Summa theologiae, cura et studio Instituti Studiorum Medievalium Ottaviensis" (1941), Garden City Press
- Thomas Aquinas, "Summa Theologiae" (1964)