본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어와 태국어의 거절화행 비교연구

A Comparative Study on Refusal Speech Acts Between Korean and Thai

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

This paper examines the refusal strategies of Korean and Thai speakers. Different languages leading to different preferences for speech act behaviors in the situations. The ultimate goal for learners learning a second language lies in their effective communication. This communication ability becomes possible when both grammatical and linguistic knowledge as well as sociolinguistic and pragmatic linguistic abilities are acquired. One of these sociolinguistic and pragmatic skills is a speech act. Refusals are typically the second part of a pair of adjacent utterances and it require a high level of pragmatic competence to be performed successfully. Refusal is not to accept requests, suggestions and offers of interlocutors. We do not want to hurt people’s feelings by the refusal, so it is mainly related to being politeness. The purpose of this study is to help Korean learners of Thai and Thai learners of Korean as to compare refusal strategies of Korean and Thai, which have a great influence on interpersonal relations. Beebe’s analysis tool is one of the most popular for the study on refusal speech act. However, it is a tool based on English refusal speech act. For this study attempted to compare the strategies employed in refusing requests, invitations, suggestions and offers by Korean and Thai according to the taxonomy of refusals developed by Beebe et al.(1990). In this article, we have divided refusal speech act strategies of Korean and Thai into three categories: Direct refusal, Indirect refusal(reason, alternative, negative willingness, future acceptance, apology, promise, avoidance and principle) and additional . The contrast study on the refusal speech act of Korean and Thai can not only examine the linguistic characteristics of the two languages, but also the Korean learners of Thai and Thai learners of Korean learn more accurately about refusal speech act, it will help both language learning.

Abstract

This paper examines the refusal strategies of Korean and Thai speakers. Different languages leading to different preferences for speech act behaviors in the situations. The ultimate goal for learners learning a second language lies in their effective communication. This communication ability becomes possible when both grammatical and linguistic knowledge as well as sociolinguistic and pragmatic linguistic abilities are acquired. One of these sociolinguistic and pragmatic skills is a speech act. Refusals are typically the second part of a pair of adjacent utterances and it require a high level of pragmatic competence to be performed successfully. Refusal is not to accept requests, suggestions and offers of interlocutors. We do not want to hurt people’s feelings by the refusal, so it is mainly related to being politeness. The purpose of this study is to help Korean learners of Thai and Thai learners of Korean as to compare refusal strategies of Korean and Thai, which have a great influence on interpersonal relations. Beebe’s analysis tool is one of the most popular for the study on refusal speech act. However, it is a tool based on English refusal speech act. For this study attempted to compare the strategies employed in refusing requests, invitations, suggestions and offers by Korean and Thai according to the taxonomy of refusals developed by Beebe et al.(1990). In this article, we have divided refusal speech act strategies of Korean and Thai into three categories: Direct refusal, Indirect refusal(reason, alternative, negative willingness, future acceptance, apology, promise, avoidance and principle) and additional . The contrast study on the refusal speech act of Korean and Thai can not only examine the linguistic characteristics of the two languages, but also the Korean learners of Thai and Thai learners of Korean learn more accurately about refusal speech act, it will help both language learning.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김유향, "한국인과 중국인의 거절 화행 비교를 통한 한국어 교수 학습 방안 연구", 석사, 외국인을위한한국어교육, pp.2008
  2. 디팡, "중국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 거절 화행 정보 구축 및 활용", 석사, 한국학과 한국언어문화전공, pp.2012
  3. 리정화, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 거절 화행 전략에 대한 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2008
  4. 서희정, "한국어 거절 화행 교육 연구 : 교재 분석을 중심으로", 석사, 한국어교육, pp.2001
  5. 수파펀 분룽, "태국인 학습자의 한국어 요청 화행 연구", 석사, 한국학, pp.2007
  6. 윤은미, "한국인과 영어권 한국어 학습자의 거절화행 비교 연구 : 체면과 공손성을 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2004
  7. 이준희, "국어의 간접 화행에 관한 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1999
  8. 홍혜란, "폴란드인 한국어 학습자의 거절화행 실현 유형과 특징에 관한 연구 -교차문화적 관점에서 본 정중성을 중심으로-", 언어와 문화, 4(2), pp.219~247 (2008), 한국언어문화교육학회
  9. Beebe, L., M., "Developing communicative competence in a second language", pp.55~73 (1990), Newbury House
  10. ธนพรรษ สายหรุ่น, "กลวิธีการปฏิเสธในภาษาอังกฤษของนักศึกษาไทยที่เรียนภาษาอังกฤษ เป็นภาษาต่างประเทศ", ms, ภาควิชาภาษาศาสตร์, pp.1999
  11. ธิสา ยุทธเสรี, "การศึกษาเปรียบเทียบกลวิธีความสุภาพในการปฏิเสธระหว่างบริษัทเอกชนกับ หน่วยงานราชการ", ms, ภาควิชาภาษาศาสตร์, pp.2012
  12. ปิยะวัลย์ วิรุฬหชัยพงษ์, "โครงสร้างและกลวิธีการขอร้องในภาษาไทยและภาษาอังกฤษแบบแอเมริกัน", ms, ภาควิชาภาษาศาสตร์, pp.2000
  13. สุนัดดา วิริยา, "การศึกษาการขอร้องในภาษาไทย", ms, ภาควิชาภาษาศาสตร์, pp.2001

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)