본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주취운전의 형사책임 - 원인에 있어서 자유로운 행위를 중심으로 -

The Criminal Responsibility of Driving While Intoxicated - Focusing on actio libera in causa -

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In this article, I have reviewed the issues about the liability of drunken driving including theories and judicial precedents. According to legislator and case, traffic accidents by drunken driving should be regarded as the case which is not remissive for criminal responsibility. For exemple, when it can be applied to the crime of fugitive from drunken driving or the crime of fatal driving style, it is not accepted by the clause ‘actio libera in causa’ in Criminal Act. Futhermore, even if someone is not drunken, he does not consent to test of alcohol, he will be punished as the crime of refusal balloon test. 102) In general Driving While Intoxicated is regarded as the behavior of prohibition. So many strong legislation is made to prevent drunken driving. But it may lead to the revival of the Volstead Act if drivers are punished of drinking though he can drive without abnormal mental state. I think that strengthening the criminal responsibility of Driving While Intoxicated is only one of the measure, it will not be used for shrinking the sound drinking culture and leading to limited interpretation that mentally or physically incompetence is not applied to Drunken driving.

Abstract

In this article, I have reviewed the issues about the liability of drunken driving including theories and judicial precedents. According to legislator and case, traffic accidents by drunken driving should be regarded as the case which is not remissive for criminal responsibility. For exemple, when it can be applied to the crime of fugitive from drunken driving or the crime of fatal driving style, it is not accepted by the clause ‘actio libera in causa’ in Criminal Act. Futhermore, even if someone is not drunken, he does not consent to test of alcohol, he will be punished as the crime of refusal balloon test. 102) In general Driving While Intoxicated is regarded as the behavior of prohibition. So many strong legislation is made to prevent drunken driving. But it may lead to the revival of the Volstead Act if drivers are punished of drinking though he can drive without abnormal mental state. I think that strengthening the criminal responsibility of Driving While Intoxicated is only one of the measure, it will not be used for shrinking the sound drinking culture and leading to limited interpretation that mentally or physically incompetence is not applied to Drunken driving.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김성돈, "형법총론" (2006), 현암사
  2. 김성천, "형법총론" (2006), 동현출판사
  3. 김형준, "음주운전과 형사책임" (2007), 진원사
  4. 김일수, "형법총론" (2006), 박영사
  5. 신동운, "형법총론" (2009), 법문사
  6. 오영근, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
  7. 이재상, "형법총론" (2008), 박영사
  8. 구욱서, "특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 제5조의3 제1항 위반죄에 있어서의 도주의 의미", 대법원 판례해설, 통권 : 17 (1992), 법원행정처
  9. 권오걸, "형법 제10조 제3항의 해석론과 발전적 입법론", 형사법연구, (22) (2004)
  10. 김남현, "음주운전에 관한 형사법적 연구 - 주취운전죄 및 음주측정불응죄를 중심으로 -", 박사, pp.2006
  11. 김형준, "일본 형법상 위험운전치사상죄의 제문제", 法學論文集, 32(1), pp.5~32 (2008), 법학연구원
  12. 김현철, "교통사고환자를 병원에 후송하고 이탈한 경우 도주차량인지 여부", 법조 (1998)
  13. 류화진, "음주운전으로 인한 교통사고와 원인이 자유로운 행위", 부산대학교 법학연구, 47(1) (2006)
  14. 박상식, "음주운전에 대한 형사법적 고찰", 경상대학교 법학연구, 13 (2005)
  15. 손동권, "판례월보", ~ (1997)
  16. 손지선, "원인에 있어서 자유로운 행위의 유형론", 형사법연구, 20(2), pp.3~22 (2008), 한국형사법학회
  17. 송진현, "특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 제5조의3 제2항 ‘피해자를 사고장소로부터 옮겨 유기하고 도주한 때’의 의미", 대법원 판례해설, (16) (1992), 법원행정처
  18. 안원하, "원인에 있어서 자유로운 행위", 부산대학교 법학연구, 38(1) (1997)
  19. 이상문, "대법원의 형법 제10조 제3항의 해석", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.487~508 (2007), 한국형사법학회
  20. 한상훈, "특가법 제5조의3(도주운전죄)과 원인에 있어서 자유로운 행위", 형사정책연구, 11(3) (2000)
  21. 한상훈, "고의의 원인에 있어서 자유로운 행위", 형사판례연구, 10 (2002)
  22. 황상현, "특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 제5조의3 제1항 위반죄와 관련된 제문제", 형사판례연구(3) (1995), 박영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)