음주운전에 대한 형사정책의 문제점과 개선방안
The Problems of Criminal Policy against DUI and their Countermeasures
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we want to talk about the history of criminal policy on driving under the influence of alcohol(DIU), criticize the existing policy by comparing it with other criminal policies in other countries, and then show ways to improve this policy. If we conclude the above, it is like this. The history of criminal policy has been a strict sticking to expansion and reinforcement of criminal punishment and a periodic general crackdown. Namely the policy that we have been enforcing was only relying on the things that were mentioned above. On the other hand in other countries like America, England, Germany, Japan and so on, they have been running various preventive policies and prevention of second offence programs in addition to crack downs and punishment, and by this they have had quite a success in reducing harms and accidents. Accordingly we need to make an improvement by using more diverse policies, like prevention, crackdown, punishment, treatment, and rehabilitation, which not only the police but government and citizens can also participate in, by looking at the precedents of other countries. In it's final analysis, it is not good for criminal policy to only rely on crackdowns and strong criminal punishment, but not only do we need to use preventive policies and prevention of second offence but we also need to adopt real time monitering system for drunk or dangerous driving while government and citizens also participate fully. Only then will we get the anticipated results.
Abstract
In this paper, we want to talk about the history of criminal policy on driving under the influence of alcohol(DIU), criticize the existing policy by comparing it with other criminal policies in other countries, and then show ways to improve this policy. If we conclude the above, it is like this. The history of criminal policy has been a strict sticking to expansion and reinforcement of criminal punishment and a periodic general crackdown. Namely the policy that we have been enforcing was only relying on the things that were mentioned above. On the other hand in other countries like America, England, Germany, Japan and so on, they have been running various preventive policies and prevention of second offence programs in addition to crack downs and punishment, and by this they have had quite a success in reducing harms and accidents. Accordingly we need to make an improvement by using more diverse policies, like prevention, crackdown, punishment, treatment, and rehabilitation, which not only the police but government and citizens can also participate in, by looking at the precedents of other countries. In it's final analysis, it is not good for criminal policy to only rely on crackdowns and strong criminal punishment, but not only do we need to use preventive policies and prevention of second offence but we also need to adopt real time monitering system for drunk or dangerous driving while government and citizens also participate fully. Only then will we get the anticipated results.
참고문헌 (31)
- 위험운전치사상죄의 형법전 편입문제, "강우예", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2010)
- 곽대경, "현대사회와 범죄" (2007)
- 김연하, "음주측정불응죄의 주체", 대법원판례해설, (74) (2008)
- 김형준, "음주측정불응죄의 몇가지 문제점", 중앙법학, (창간) (1999)
- 김혜정, "관련판례를 통해서 본 음주측정불응죄 처벌의 타당성 및 적정성 여부", 형사법연구, (25), pp.309~330 (2006), 한국형사법학회
- 문성도, "음주측정불응죄 규정의 진술거부권 침해 여부", 경찰대학 논문집, 16 (1996)
- 박기범, "음주운전 억제를 위한 실효적 정책 구상", 형사정책, 20(1), pp.83~110 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 박달현, "음주운전죄의 목적과 음주측정불응죄의 성립요건에 대한 재검토", 비교형사법연구, 2(2) (2000)
- 박달현, "형법상 보충성원칙에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1996
- 박상기, "형법총론" (2004)
- 박상식, "음주운전에 대한 형사법적 고찰", 경상대학교 법학연구, 13 (2005)
- 배종대, "형법총론" (2009)
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2011)
- 배종대, "신형사소송법" (2009)
- 백웅철, "음주측정불응죄의 성립요건", 재판과 판례, 12 (2004)
- 봉욱, "음주측정불응죄의 성립요건", 형사판례연구, (3) (1995)
- 손기식, "음주측정불응죄에 관한 약간의 고찰", 형사판례연구, (4) (1996)
- 신동운, "운전종료후의 음주측정불응죄와 영장주의", 형사재판의 제문제, 2 (1998)
- 정승환, "신형사소송법" (2008), 홍문사
- 심희기, "음주측정불응죄의 성립요건과 계속운전의 의사 : 음주측정불응죄에 관한 종전의 대법원판결과 최근의 헌법재판소 결정", 형사판례연구, (6) (1998)
- 유남석, "1995. 1. 5. 개정된 도로교통법상 음주측정불응죄의 성립요건", 대법원 판례해설, (28) (1997)
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2000)
- 이재상, "형사소송법" (1999)
- 전영실, "음주운전의 억제요인에 대한 연구", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.257~277 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 음주운전 억제방안 연구, "전영실", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2010)
- 최석윤, "상징형법에 대한 비판적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.6~164 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 황현락, "음주운전 관련 법제의 문제점과 개선방안 고찰", 한양법학, (35), pp.191~227 (2011), 한양법학회
- Claus Roxin, "Strafverfahrensrecht, 23 Aufl" (1993)
- Sen, A, "Do Stricter Penalties Deter Drinking and Driving? An Empirical Investigation of Canadian Impaired Driving Laws", Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(1) (2001)
- Werner Maihofer, "Rechtsstaat und Menschliche Wrüde", ~ (1968)
- Winfrid Hassemer, "Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts, 2 Aufl" (1990)