Crime Prevention by Strengthening REGULATIONS on Drunk Driving
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to discuss the countermeasures against drunk driving regulations in terms of crime prevention because drunk driving is not a simple traffic crime but a potential murder. One methodology would be to raise the punishment for drunk driving and to improve the public's awareness and conduct regular traffic accident prevention education so that fundamental problems can be solved and have high efficiency and normative power. In Korea, the ‘Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes, etc.’ and ‘Road Traffic Act’ were amended in Korea following the case of 'Yoon Chang-ho', who died in a drunk driving accident in 2018. Drunk driving is a very dangerous behavior, as it can endanger your life as well as the lives of others. Even if an accident does not occur, such an act is a violation of the Road Traffic Act and therefore carries criminal responsibility. In terms of general crime prevention, the penalties for drunk driving are becoming stricter than in the past. In the improved system, even if the blood alcohol level is 0.03% or more and less than 0.08, im-prisonment for not more than one year or a fine of not more than 5 million won is imposed. In the case of two or more violations of the strengthened regulations, imprisonment for not less than 2 years and not more than 5 years, or a fine of not less than 10 million won and not more than 20 million won. What used to be a three-out was changed to a two-out for drunk driving. However on November 25, 2021, the Constitutional Court ruled that the provisions of the Road Traffic Act, which required uniform and aggravated punishments for drunk driving more than twice, were against the Constitution(Constitutional Court 2021.11.25, 2019Hunba 446, etc.). In addi-tion, if you injure a person while driving, you will be punished by imprisonment for not less than 1 year and not more than 15 years in prison, or a fine of not less than 10 million won to not more than 30 million won(Before the amendment, in case of death while driving under the influence of alcohol, he was sentenced to fixed-term impris-onment of more than one year). Drunk driving accidents can lead to criminal punishment, administrative sanc-tions, and even civil lawsuits. Keep in mind that drunk driving can be a potential killer on the road. Even if you didn't harm anyone, just drinking and driving can be a big hit in society. Method: Injuries and deaths due to drunk driving are on the rise. As a countermeasure against this, the stand-ards and level of punishment for drunk driving are being strengthened. First, let's look at the legal punishment for drunk driving through the laws related to drunk driving. Second, we examine the severity of the damage caused by drunk driving through statistics such as drunk driving accidents, injuries, and deaths in current Korean society. Third, as a comparative legal review, by examining foreign laws on drunk driving accidents, matters to be referred to in Korean laws and regulations are reviewed. Fourth, I would like to make a legislative proposal by reviewing the problems and improvement plans of the drunk driving legal system. Previous studies on drunk driving have mainly focused on strengthening the punishment for drunk driving. This study intends to review the general crime prevention aspect by not only strengthening punishment but also changing the public's perception through edu-cation. Results: Drunk driving affects not only drunk drivers, but also others and society. It is necessary to keep in mind that drunk driving is a potential homicide, and the prohibition of drunk driving should be strengthened. In addi-tion, if the general prevention effect can be successfully established and nudged against the offenses of drunk drivers, social costs can be reduced. Conclusion: For drunk driving, both the ‘external motivation’ such as punishment, as well as the ‘intrinsic moti-vation’ to act in compliance with the norm must be activated. To this end, it is necessary to raise awareness that drunk driving must be caught and punished. The certainty of punishment has a positive effect on crime deter-rence. Also, in the case of self-driving cars in the era of the 4th industrial revolution, there are no regulations for drunk drivers, so a review should be carried out.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to discuss the countermeasures against drunk driving regulations in terms of crime prevention because drunk driving is not a simple traffic crime but a potential murder. One methodology would be to raise the punishment for drunk driving and to improve the public's awareness and conduct regular traffic accident prevention education so that fundamental problems can be solved and have high efficiency and normative power. In Korea, the ‘Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes, etc.’ and ‘Road Traffic Act’ were amended in Korea following the case of 'Yoon Chang-ho', who died in a drunk driving accident in 2018. Drunk driving is a very dangerous behavior, as it can endanger your life as well as the lives of others. Even if an accident does not occur, such an act is a violation of the Road Traffic Act and therefore carries criminal responsibility. In terms of general crime prevention, the penalties for drunk driving are becoming stricter than in the past. In the improved system, even if the blood alcohol level is 0.03% or more and less than 0.08, im-prisonment for not more than one year or a fine of not more than 5 million won is imposed. In the case of two or more violations of the strengthened regulations, imprisonment for not less than 2 years and not more than 5 years, or a fine of not less than 10 million won and not more than 20 million won. What used to be a three-out was changed to a two-out for drunk driving. However on November 25, 2021, the Constitutional Court ruled that the provisions of the Road Traffic Act, which required uniform and aggravated punishments for drunk driving more than twice, were against the Constitution(Constitutional Court 2021.11.25, 2019Hunba 446, etc.). In addi-tion, if you injure a person while driving, you will be punished by imprisonment for not less than 1 year and not more than 15 years in prison, or a fine of not less than 10 million won to not more than 30 million won(Before the amendment, in case of death while driving under the influence of alcohol, he was sentenced to fixed-term impris-onment of more than one year). Drunk driving accidents can lead to criminal punishment, administrative sanc-tions, and even civil lawsuits. Keep in mind that drunk driving can be a potential killer on the road. Even if you didn't harm anyone, just drinking and driving can be a big hit in society. Method: Injuries and deaths due to drunk driving are on the rise. As a countermeasure against this, the stand-ards and level of punishment for drunk driving are being strengthened. First, let's look at the legal punishment for drunk driving through the laws related to drunk driving. Second, we examine the severity of the damage caused by drunk driving through statistics such as drunk driving accidents, injuries, and deaths in current Korean society. Third, as a comparative legal review, by examining foreign laws on drunk driving accidents, matters to be referred to in Korean laws and regulations are reviewed. Fourth, I would like to make a legislative proposal by reviewing the problems and improvement plans of the drunk driving legal system. Previous studies on drunk driving have mainly focused on strengthening the punishment for drunk driving. This study intends to review the general crime prevention aspect by not only strengthening punishment but also changing the public's perception through edu-cation. Results: Drunk driving affects not only drunk drivers, but also others and society. It is necessary to keep in mind that drunk driving is a potential homicide, and the prohibition of drunk driving should be strengthened. In addi-tion, if the general prevention effect can be successfully established and nudged against the offenses of drunk drivers, social costs can be reduced. Conclusion: For drunk driving, both the ‘external motivation’ such as punishment, as well as the ‘intrinsic moti-vation’ to act in compliance with the norm must be activated. To this end, it is necessary to raise awareness that drunk driving must be caught and punished. The certainty of punishment has a positive effect on crime deter-rence. Also, in the case of self-driving cars in the era of the 4th industrial revolution, there are no regulations for drunk drivers, so a review should be carried out.
참고문헌 (31)
- 박광현, "Legal Countermeasures against HATE Speech", Regulations, 6(2), pp.16~25 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- 이승주, "A Study on Role Conflict of Korean Security Police -Focusing on Working Period-", Regulations, 6(1), pp.43~54 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Kim Hak-bum, "A Study on CRIME Prevention and Policing in KOREA’s Urban Regeneration", Regulations, 3(2), pp.6~12 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
- Kim Hak-bum, "A Study on an Autonomous Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence for CRIME Prevention", Public Value, 4(1), pp.7~13 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- 김종구, "음주측정불응죄와 미국의 묵시적동의법의 비교 고찰 ― 위헌성 문제를 중심으로 ―", 미국헌법연구, 30(3), pp.53~82 (2019), 미국헌법학회
- 권보원, "음주운전 처벌법이 사회규범으로 작동하기 위한 조건: 통계와 행동경제학이 주는 교훈", 법경제학연구, 17(1), pp.55~136 (2020), 한국법경제학회[DOI]
- 박찬걸, "음주측정불응에 대한 합리적 대응방안", 형사정책연구, 22(3), pp.139~173 (2011), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 김종갑, "미국의 교통범죄처리제도 고찰 - 뉴욕주를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 62, pp.151~179 (2020), 부설법학연구소
- Kim SH, "A Study on the Effectiveness of the Cognitive-action Program for Drunk Drivers", Mental Health & Social Work, 11, pp.157~183 (2004)
- Becker GS, "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach", Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), pp.169~217 (1968)
- 정철우, "음주운전죄 형량의 영향요인 유형화 및 영향정도 분석을 통한 음주운전 억제에 관한 연구", 경찰학연구, 12(3), pp.259~276 (2012), 경찰대학[DOI]
- 윤영석, "음주운전죄에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 입법적 개선방안을 중심으로 -", 동아법학, (84), pp.147~176 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
- Oh Sei-youen, "A Study on Response System against Sexual Violence CRIME Via IOT-Based Smart Devices", Regulations, 5(1), pp.30~38 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- 김호기, "시동잠금장치 프로그램 시행과 관련된 논점 및 입법 방향 ― 스웨덴의 비전 제로 정책의 취지 도입 필요성 및 이러한 취지에 기초한 시동잠금장치 프로그램 도입이 갖는 의미의 검토 ―", 서울법학, 26(4), pp.187~222 (2019), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
- 박용수, "상습 음주운전자 가중처벌이 교통사고 억제효과에 미치는 영향", 한국경찰연구, 16(3), pp.133~150 (2017), 한국경찰연구학회[DOI]
- 이정덕, "지역사회 자율방범활동의 운영실태 및 활성화 제고방안", 한국경찰연구, 10(2), pp.177~198 (2011), 한국경찰연구학회
- 정세종, "자율방범단체의 활성화방안에 관한 연구", 한국경찰학회보, 13(3), pp.103~122 (2011), 한국경찰학회
- 황현락, "자율방범대법 제정을 위한 법정책적 고찰", 한양법학, (36), pp.435~460 (2011), 한양법학회
- 김두상, "자율주행자동차에 관한 형사법적 고찰 ― 자율주행자동차 상용화 촉진 및 지원에 관한 법률을 중심으로 ―", 서울법학, 28(1), pp.283~315 (2020), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
- 남재성, "Measures to Revitalize Resident Participation in the Self-Governing Police SYSTEM", Regulations, 6(3), pp.29~38 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- 박현선, "음주운전자의 알코올 치료프로그램 효과성에 관한 연구", 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 24(10), pp.215~223 (2019), 한국컴퓨터정보학회[DOI]
- Noh HC, "Legitimacy of Disposition of Ex Officio and Dismissal of a Police Officer Appointed by the City Council for Causing a Drunk Driving Traffic Accident", Journal of Labour Law, 69, pp.268~272 (2019)
- 김남현, "음주측정기의 측정오차에 관한 올바른 이해 -서울행정법원 2001구51776 자동차운전면허취소처분취소판결을 중심으로-", 경찰학연구, (3), pp.84~113 (2002), 경찰대학
- 김선광, "위드마크 공식에 의한 혈중알코올농도 추정의 몇 가지 문제점", 法學論文集, 44(1), pp.197~231 (2020), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 이윤제, "위드마크 공식의 법적 성질과 적용 범위", 경찰법연구, 6(1), pp.119~141 (2008), 한국경찰법학회[DOI]
- Kim SK, "Study on the Preventive Policy for Drunken Driving", Doctoral, pp.2020
- Lee SH, "Study on the Intervention Program for DUI Students", Master, pp.2015
- Ryu JI, "Study on Efficiency of Education", PR Program for Decrease in Drunken Driving, Yonsei University, 2008
- Beccaria C, "Dei Delitti e Delle Pene" (2009), Torrossa
