미국 가석방제도에 기초한 현행제도의 실효성 확보에 관한 연구
A Study on the effectiveness of the current system based on the U.S. parole system
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study discusses the Study on the effectiveness of the current system based on the U.S. parole system. Parole not only make convicted prisoner's return to the human society earlier by reducing a period of unnecessary punishment execution but also plays a role of promoting convicted prisoners voluntary desire to return to the human society. therefore it is suggested that parole will be effectively and eagerly enforced. But parole puts on passive enforce in korea. parole can be regarded as not a reduced term of imprisonment but a new type of execution of punishment converted from institutional treatment into community treatment that is to say as one stage of correctional treatment. The tendency of criminal policy‘s stress nowadays is toward community treatment of a convicted prisoner than institutional treatment. It is implemented in the form of administrative decision by the parole reviewing committee and the parolees are released under the supervision of mandatory probation. This article studied the aspects of the theory as well as the reality of the current parole which has been administered. and then the result of this study is that the current parole system in korea has been carried out in a very passive fashion. generally the final goal of the correction treatment is rehabilitation. The most critical problem is about the eligibility requirement. Only the offenders who have served most of their term would be eligible for parole, regardless of their degree of rehabilitation or corrections. Conduct electronic surveillance system in the United States to take advantage of the various programs should be developed. The law of the future will be able to take advantage of practical materials. A life sentence in the U.S. system of enforcement of the prohibition era parole system can be seen as reflecting the change. In addition, the nature of parole, post-management system having efficient operation of probation shall establish measures. You should try to prevent future recidivism will. In the long run the most important point is to realize that parole is not a favor given by the authorities, not a reduced term of imprisonment but rather a new type of correction treatment for rehabilitation converted from institutional treatment into community treatment.
Abstract
This study discusses the Study on the effectiveness of the current system based on the U.S. parole system. Parole not only make convicted prisoner's return to the human society earlier by reducing a period of unnecessary punishment execution but also plays a role of promoting convicted prisoners voluntary desire to return to the human society. therefore it is suggested that parole will be effectively and eagerly enforced. But parole puts on passive enforce in korea. parole can be regarded as not a reduced term of imprisonment but a new type of execution of punishment converted from institutional treatment into community treatment that is to say as one stage of correctional treatment. The tendency of criminal policy‘s stress nowadays is toward community treatment of a convicted prisoner than institutional treatment. It is implemented in the form of administrative decision by the parole reviewing committee and the parolees are released under the supervision of mandatory probation. This article studied the aspects of the theory as well as the reality of the current parole which has been administered. and then the result of this study is that the current parole system in korea has been carried out in a very passive fashion. generally the final goal of the correction treatment is rehabilitation. The most critical problem is about the eligibility requirement. Only the offenders who have served most of their term would be eligible for parole, regardless of their degree of rehabilitation or corrections. Conduct electronic surveillance system in the United States to take advantage of the various programs should be developed. The law of the future will be able to take advantage of practical materials. A life sentence in the U.S. system of enforcement of the prohibition era parole system can be seen as reflecting the change. In addition, the nature of parole, post-management system having efficient operation of probation shall establish measures. You should try to prevent future recidivism will. In the long run the most important point is to realize that parole is not a favor given by the authorities, not a reduced term of imprisonment but rather a new type of correction treatment for rehabilitation converted from institutional treatment into community treatment.
참고문헌 (44)
- 유기천, "개정형법학(총론강의)", pp.372~ (2011), 법문사
- 김일수, "형법총론", pp.790~ (2002), 박영사
- Howard Abadinsky, "Probation and parole : theory and practice", pp.205~ (1994)
- 정성근, "형법총론", pp.729~ (2012), 성균관출판부
- 허주욱, "교정보호학", pp.643~ (2010), 박영사
- Reckless, "The Crime Problem", pp.559~ (1967)
- 조준현, "가석방 절차와 가석방대상자에 대한 사회복귀 준비에 대한 비교제도론적 검토", 교정연구, 38, pp.31~55 (2008), 한국교정학회
- 노컷뉴스, "美 인종갈등, 교도소 폭동사태까지 불러", ~ (2014)
- 캘리포니아주 경비등급 운영 등 연구(Ⅱ. 교정제도 개황), "법무부 교정본부", ~ (2010)
- Todd Clear, "American Corrections", pp.386~
- 이수정, "여성폭력 범죄자 인권보호 담론의 재고", 여성정책 환경변화와 미래정책 패러다임(미래여성정책포럼 연속 토론회), pp.71~ (2012), 한국여성정책연구원
- sbs 뉴스, "미국 성범죄자 감시제도 허점…신분조작 너무 쉬워", ~ (2014)
- Sentencing Guidelines and Parole Reform, , New Zeleand Law Commission, 17~ (2006)
- "폐지제정(시행 2010.6.14.)", 법무부예규 제935호, ~ (2010)
- "가석방업무지침 제9조(가석방심사 유형)", ~
- "가석방 업무지침 제12조(제한사범)", ~
- "가석방 업무지침 제1조(목적)", ~
- "가석방 업무지침 제2조(적용범위)", ~
- "가석방 업무지침 제3조(대상자 선정)", ~
- "가석방업무지침 제 15조", ~
- "가석방업무지침 제 16조(보호사범)", ~
- "헌법재판소 2010. 12. 28. 자 2009헌마 70 결정", ~
- "형법 제72조", ~
- "형법 제76조", ~
- "타법개정(시행 2010.5.5)", 대통령령 제22151호, ~ (2010)
- "가석방자 관리규정 제14조(국외 이주 등 허가의 신고 및 통보)", ~
- "가석방자 관리규정 제16조(국외 여행자의 귀국신고)", ~
- "대법원 2010.9.30, 선고, 2010도 6403 판결", ~
- "형법 제62조", ~
- "보호관찰 등에 관한 법률 시행령 제19조", ~
- "헌법재판소 2010. 2. 25. 자 2008헌가23 결정(형법 제41조 등 위헌제청)", ~
- "법무부 통계연보", ~ (2013)
- 가석방 운용실태와 개선방안, "박성래", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2004)
- "2012년 경찰백서"
- "제75조 (가석방심사사항 조사)", ~
- 이형섭, "위치추적 전자감독제도 시행 5년의현황과 과제", 보호관찰, 13(1), pp.55~165 (2013), 한국보호관찰학회
