가석방의 사법처분화 방안 연구
A Study on Parole as a Judicial Measure
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Unlike other execution actions, parole is a critical decision that changes the sentence regarding the criminal character of imprisonment depriving physical liberties from the inmate. As it changes the contents of penalty which was already sentenced, inter alia, the essential part of the executive measure, it should be held by the judge. Regarding the fact that suspended sentence and probation, substantially similar to parole, are decided by the judge, it is against the equity that parole is sentenced by administrative organization. This controversy, however, is neither prudentially being examined in Korea and nor reflected in actual legislation, albeit it had been once suggested in a while. This is because this legal reform requires extensive changes in administrative and judicial frameworks. In this regards, this research aims to secure the minimum standard of procedural safeguards and to provide judicial remedies for the inmate. This research specially focuses on concurrent parole procedures such as securing the right of access to information, the right to request for parole, the right of consent to parole and the right for statement of opinion. Furthermore, this paper explores into the necessity of notification system of parole decision process and result. In case of the judicial remedies, in particular, this paper analyzes the introduction of plausible procedure based on whether the parole was under the authority of the court or not. Main academic concern of this paper is to seek legal countermeasures against the existing parole system and derive judicial way where the inmate participate in parole system procedures. The author hopes that this analysis can contribute to the volition of the inmate and to the progress of rehabilitation, the ultimate goal of the imprisonment.
Abstract
Unlike other execution actions, parole is a critical decision that changes the sentence regarding the criminal character of imprisonment depriving physical liberties from the inmate. As it changes the contents of penalty which was already sentenced, inter alia, the essential part of the executive measure, it should be held by the judge. Regarding the fact that suspended sentence and probation, substantially similar to parole, are decided by the judge, it is against the equity that parole is sentenced by administrative organization. This controversy, however, is neither prudentially being examined in Korea and nor reflected in actual legislation, albeit it had been once suggested in a while. This is because this legal reform requires extensive changes in administrative and judicial frameworks. In this regards, this research aims to secure the minimum standard of procedural safeguards and to provide judicial remedies for the inmate. This research specially focuses on concurrent parole procedures such as securing the right of access to information, the right to request for parole, the right of consent to parole and the right for statement of opinion. Furthermore, this paper explores into the necessity of notification system of parole decision process and result. In case of the judicial remedies, in particular, this paper analyzes the introduction of plausible procedure based on whether the parole was under the authority of the court or not. Main academic concern of this paper is to seek legal countermeasures against the existing parole system and derive judicial way where the inmate participate in parole system procedures. The author hopes that this analysis can contribute to the volition of the inmate and to the progress of rehabilitation, the ultimate goal of the imprisonment.
참고문헌 (50)
- 강영철, "가석방제도의 개선방안", 矯正硏究, 21, pp.117~155 (2003), 한국교정학회
- 강영철, "自由刑과 行刑制度의 發展方向", 矯正硏究, 19, pp.117~162 (2003), 한국교정학회
- 권오걸, "형법총론, 제2판" (2007), 형설출판사
- 자유형제도의 개선방안, "김성돈", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1994)
- 김용희, "형법총론, 개정2판" (2007), 형설출판사
- 김일수, "한국형법(Ⅱ)" (1993), 박영사
- 김일수, "새로 쓴 형법총론, 제11판" (2006), 박영사
- 김차훈, "한국의 가석방제도에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2002
- 박상기, "형법총론, 제8판" (2009), 박영사
- 박성래, "가석방의 운영실태와 개선방안" (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박효원, "교정환경의 변화와 가석방제도의 개선방안", 석사, pp.2004
- 배종대, "형법총론, 제9전정판" (2008), 홍문사
- 배종대, "형사정책, 제7전정판" (2008), 홍문사
- 배종대, "행형학" (2002), 홍문사
- 성낙현, "형법총론" (2010), 동방문화사
- 우리나라 양형 현황에 관한 기초보고, "손철우", 양형위원회, 2~ (2007)
- 신명섭, "가석방제도에 관한 고찰", 석사, pp.2003
- 행형법개정시안, "신양균", 전북대학교, ~ (2005)
- 신은영, "현행 가석방제도에서 사법적 기능의 보완방안", 석사, pp.2010
- 2010 연간보고서, "양형위원회", 양형위원회, ~ (2010)
- 오영근, "형법총론, 제2판" (2009), 박영사
- 바람직한 양형기준제와 양형위원회 운영의 방식에 관한 연구, "오영근", 대검찰청, ~ (2010)
- 원형식, "형법총론, 제2판" (2009), 청목출판사
- 이보영, "가석방제도의 실태와 활성화 방안", 교정연구, (5) (1995), 한국교정학회
- 형사법개정연구(Ⅳ) 자유형제도의 정비방안, "이승현", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2009)
- 이영란, "형법학" (2008), 형설출판사
- 이재상, "형법총론, 제6판" (2008)
- 임웅, "형법총론, 개정판 제2보정" (2008), 법문사
- 원형식, "형법총론, 제2판" (2009), 청목출판사
- 독일 행형법에 관한 연구, "장규원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1996)
- 장규원, "일본에서의 가석방 신청권에 대한 논의", 형사정책연구, 9(1) (1998), 한국형사정책연구원
- 장중식, "가석방제도 개선방안에 관한 연구", 矯正硏究, 37, pp.83~108 (2007), 한국교정학회
- 가석방의 실태와 효율적 운용방안에 관한 연구, "장영민", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1991)
- 정성근, "형법총론, 제4판" (2008), 삼지원
- 정승환, "형벌집행에 대한 법관의 통제와 형집행법원의 필요성", 형사법연구, (22), pp.374~406 (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 정영일, "형법총론, 개정판" (2007), 박영사
- 鄭鎭連, "가석방제도와 관련된 제 문제의 검토", 矯正硏究, 20, pp.147~185 (2003), 한국교정학회
- 정진연, "형법총론, 제2판" (2010), 숭실대학교 출판부
- 한영수, "현행 가석방심사체계의 문제점", 형사정책, 15(1), pp.3~180 (2003), 한국형사정책학회
- Howard Abadinsky, "Probation and Parole: theory and practice, 7th edition" (2000), Prentice Hall
- Dean J. Champion, "Probation, Parole and Community Corrections, 2nd edition" (1996), Prentice Hall
- Joan Petersilia, "When Prisoners Come home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Frank Schmalleger, "Criminal Justice Today: An Introduction Text for the 21st Century, 9th edition" (2007), Pearson Prentice Hall
- 大塚仁, "刑法槪說, 第3版 增補版" (2005), 有斐閣
- 福田 平, "刑法總論, 全訂 第4版" (2004), 有斐閣
- 榎本正也, "假釋放と適正手續の保障-聯邦最高裁判所のGreenholtz事件判決", 更生保護と犯罪豫防, (65) (1982), ,
- 榎本正也, "米國におけるパロ―ル假釋放をめぐる若干の考察", 更生保護と犯罪豫防, (49) (1978), ,
- 河野和子, "米國におけるプロベーション及びパロ―ル取消手續におけるデュープロセスの保障", 更生保護と犯罪豫防, (40) (1976), ,
- 藤本哲也, "刑事政策槪論, 全訂 第6版" (2008), 靑林書院
- 瀨川晃, "犯罪者の社会內処遇" (1991), 成文堂